• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Comparison of PRAS II, RapID ANA, and API 20A systems for identification of anaerobic bacteria.用于鉴定厌氧菌的PRAS II、RapID ANA和API 20A系统的比较
J Clin Microbiol. 1985 Jan;21(1):122-6. doi: 10.1128/jcm.21.1.122-126.1985.
2
Clinical evaluation of the RapID-ANA II panel for identification of anaerobic bacteria.用于鉴定厌氧菌的RapID-ANA II鉴定板的临床评估
J Clin Microbiol. 1991 Mar;29(3):457-62. doi: 10.1128/jcm.29.3.457-462.1991.
3
Comparison of the PRAS II, AN-Ident, and RapID-ANA systems for identification of anaerobic bacteria.PRAS II、AN-Ident和RapID-ANA系统用于鉴定厌氧细菌的比较。
J Clin Microbiol. 1985 Jul;22(1):32-5. doi: 10.1128/jcm.22.1.32-35.1985.
4
Evaluation of the RapID ANA system as a four-hour method for anaerobe identification.评估RapID ANA系统作为一种四小时厌氧细菌鉴定方法的效果。
Pathology. 1988 Jul;20(3):256-9. doi: 10.3109/00313028809059503.
5
Accuracy and reproducibility of the 4-hour ATB 32A method for anaerobe identification.用于厌氧菌鉴定的4小时ATB 32A方法的准确性和可重复性。
J Clin Microbiol. 1989 Nov;27(11):2509-13. doi: 10.1128/jcm.27.11.2509-2513.1989.
6
Comparison of three methods for anaerobe identification.三种厌氧菌鉴定方法的比较。
J Clin Microbiol. 1983 Sep;18(3):614-21. doi: 10.1128/jcm.18.3.614-621.1983.
7
Comparative evaluation of three identification systems for anaerobes.三种厌氧菌鉴定系统的比较评估
J Clin Microbiol. 1985 Jul;22(1):52-5. doi: 10.1128/jcm.22.1.52-55.1985.
8
Evaluation of the new RapID-ANA II system for the identification of clinical anaerobic isolates.新型RapID-ANA II系统用于临床厌氧菌分离株鉴定的评估
J Clin Microbiol. 1991 May;29(5):874-8. doi: 10.1128/jcm.29.5.874-878.1991.
9
Evaluation of the RapID-ANA system for identification of anaerobic bacteria of veterinary origin.用于鉴定兽医源厌氧菌的RapID-ANA系统评估
J Clin Microbiol. 1985 Dec;22(6):980-3. doi: 10.1128/jcm.22.6.980-983.1985.
10
Comparison of BBL Crystal ANR ID Kit and API rapid ID 32 A for identification of anaerobic bacteria.用于鉴定厌氧菌的BBL Crystal ANR ID试剂盒与API快速鉴定32A的比较
Zentralbl Bakteriol. 1996 Jul;284(2-3):329-47. doi: 10.1016/s0934-8840(96)80109-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Antimicrobial resistance of bacterial pathogens isolated from the infections of post maxillofacial surgery.口腔颌面部手术后感染分离的细菌病原体的耐药性。
J Med Life. 2022 Aug;15(8):944-950. doi: 10.25122/jml-2021-0149.
2
Anaerobic bacteria in wastewater treatment plant.污水处理厂中的厌氧菌。
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2018 Jul;91(5):571-579. doi: 10.1007/s00420-018-1307-6. Epub 2018 Mar 28.
3
Multicenter evaluation of the Vitek 2 anaerobe and Corynebacterium identification card.Vitek 2厌氧菌及棒状杆菌鉴定卡的多中心评估
J Clin Microbiol. 2008 Aug;46(8):2646-51. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00450-08. Epub 2008 Jun 18.
4
Thyroid abscess due to a mixed anaerobic infection with Fusobacterium mortiferum.由死亡梭杆菌混合厌氧菌感染引起的甲状腺脓肿。
J Clin Microbiol. 2005 Dec;43(12):6202-4. doi: 10.1128/JCM.43.12.6202-6204.2005.
5
16S ribosomal DNA sequence-based analysis of clinically significant gram-positive anaerobic cocci.基于16S核糖体DNA序列的具有临床意义的革兰氏阳性厌氧球菌分析。
J Clin Microbiol. 2003 Apr;41(4):1363-9. doi: 10.1128/JCM.41.4.1363-1369.2003.
6
Gram-positive anaerobic cocci.革兰氏阳性厌氧球菌
Clin Microbiol Rev. 1998 Jan;11(1):81-120. doi: 10.1128/CMR.11.1.81.
7
Comparison of two systems for identification of anaerobic bacteria.两种厌氧细菌鉴定系统的比较
Eur J Clin Microbiol. 1985 Jun;4(3):282-5. doi: 10.1007/BF02013653.
8
Accuracy and reproducibility of a four-hour method for anaerobe identification.一种用于厌氧菌鉴定的四小时方法的准确性和可重复性。
J Clin Microbiol. 1985 Jun;21(6):894-8. doi: 10.1128/jcm.21.6.894-898.1985.
9
Evaluation of the RapID-ANA system for identification of anaerobic bacteria of veterinary origin.用于鉴定兽医源厌氧菌的RapID-ANA系统评估
J Clin Microbiol. 1985 Dec;22(6):980-3. doi: 10.1128/jcm.22.6.980-983.1985.
10
Clinical evaluation of the Vitek ANI card for identification of anaerobic bacteria.用于鉴定厌氧菌的Vitek ANI卡的临床评估
J Clin Microbiol. 1988 Feb;26(2):225-30. doi: 10.1128/jcm.26.2.225-230.1988.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluation of a prereduced anaerobically sterilized medium (PRAS II) system for identification anaerobic microorganisms.用于鉴定厌氧微生物的预还原厌氧灭菌培养基(PRAS II)系统的评估。
J Clin Microbiol. 1982 Sep;16(3):570-2. doi: 10.1128/jcm.16.3.570-572.1982.
2
Comparison of three methods for anaerobe identification.三种厌氧菌鉴定方法的比较。
J Clin Microbiol. 1983 Sep;18(3):614-21. doi: 10.1128/jcm.18.3.614-621.1983.
3
Micromethod system for identification of anaerobic bacteria.用于鉴定厌氧菌的微量方法系统。
Appl Microbiol. 1973 May;25(5):713-7. doi: 10.1128/am.25.5.713-717.1973.
4
Comparison of three procedures for biochemical testing of anaerobic bacteria.三种厌氧菌生化检测方法的比较
J Clin Microbiol. 1975 Jan;1(1):15-24. doi: 10.1128/jcm.1.1.15-24.1975.
5
Comparison of API and Minitek to Center for Disease Control methods for the biochemical characterization of anaerobes.将API和Minitek方法与美国疾病控制中心用于厌氧菌生化特性鉴定的方法进行比较。
J Clin Microbiol. 1976 Sep;4(3):227-31. doi: 10.1128/jcm.4.3.227-231.1976.
6
API and Minitek systems in identification of clinical isolates of anaerobic gram-negative bacilli and Clostridium species.API和Minitek系统在鉴定革兰氏阴性厌氧杆菌和梭菌属临床分离株中的应用。
J Clin Microbiol. 1979 Jul;10(1):14-8. doi: 10.1128/jcm.10.1.14-18.1979.

用于鉴定厌氧菌的PRAS II、RapID ANA和API 20A系统的比较

Comparison of PRAS II, RapID ANA, and API 20A systems for identification of anaerobic bacteria.

作者信息

Karachewski N O, Busch E L, Wells C L

出版信息

J Clin Microbiol. 1985 Jan;21(1):122-6. doi: 10.1128/jcm.21.1.122-126.1985.

DOI:10.1128/jcm.21.1.122-126.1985
PMID:3881468
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC271588/
Abstract

This study evaluated the PRAS II, RapID ANA, and API 20A systems for the identification of anaerobic bacteria. A total of 80 isolates (68 fresh clinical isolates and 12 stock cultures) were examined and included 25 Bacteriodes spp., 7 Fusobacterium spp., 12 Clostridium spp., 2 Veillonella spp., 16 gram-positive cocci, and 18 gram-positive nonsporeforming bacilli. All isolates were initially identified by the procedures outlined in Holdeman et al. (ed.), Anaerobe Laboratory Manual, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Va., 1977; identifications from the PRAS II, RapID ANA, and API 20A systems were compared with these initial identifications. If no supplemental tests were required, the RapID ANA and API 20A systems had incubation times of 4 and 24 h, respectively; the PRAS II system generally required 2 to 5 days of incubation, depending on the growth rate of the isolate. PRAS II identified 74% correct to species level, 14% correct to genus only, and 6% incorrect; 6% could not be identified. PRAS II data were reevaluated according to a revised data base that was provided after completion of the study; PRAS II (revised) identified 82% correct to species, 12% correct to genus only, and 6% incorrect. RapID ANA identified 62% correct to the species level, 28% correct to genus only, and 10% incorrect. API 20A identified 71% correct to the species level, 10% correct to genus only, and 3% incorrect; 16% could not identified. The API 20A is a more established system for identification of anaerobic bacteria; PRAS II and RapID ANA appear to be promising new methods for the identification of anaerobic bacteria.

摘要

本研究评估了PRAS II、RapID ANA和API 20A系统用于鉴定厌氧菌的性能。共检测了80株分离菌(68株新鲜临床分离株和12株保藏培养物),包括25株拟杆菌属、7株梭杆菌属、12株梭菌属、2株韦荣球菌属、16株革兰氏阳性球菌和18株革兰氏阳性无芽孢杆菌。所有分离菌最初均按照Holdeman等人(编著)的《厌氧菌实验室手册》(弗吉尼亚理工学院和州立大学,弗吉尼亚州布莱克斯堡,1977年)中所述程序进行鉴定;将PRAS II、RapID ANA和API 20A系统的鉴定结果与这些初始鉴定结果进行比较。如果无需进行补充试验,RapID ANA和API 20A系统的孵育时间分别为4小时和24小时;PRAS II系统通常需要2至5天的孵育时间,具体取决于分离菌的生长速度。PRAS II在种水平鉴定正确的比例为74%,仅在属水平鉴定正确的比例为14%,鉴定错误的比例为6%;6%无法鉴定。根据研究完成后提供的修订数据库对PRAS II数据进行了重新评估;PRAS II(修订版)在种水平鉴定正确的比例为82%,仅在属水平鉴定正确的比例为12%,鉴定错误的比例为6%。RapID ANA在种水平鉴定正确的比例为62%,仅在属水平鉴定正确的比例为28%,鉴定错误的比例为10%。API 20A在种水平鉴定正确的比例为71%,仅在属水平鉴定正确的比例为10%,鉴定错误的比例为3%;16%无法鉴定。API 20A是一种更为成熟的厌氧菌鉴定系统;PRAS II和RapID ANA似乎是有前景的厌氧菌鉴定新方法。