Suppr超能文献

70 岁以上个体献血的安全性及其对五个发达国家血液供应的贡献:BEST 协作组研究。

Safety of blood donation by individuals over age 70 and their contribution to the blood supply in five developed countries: a BEST Collaborative group study.

机构信息

Canadian Blood Services, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.

Héma-Québec, Québec City, Québec, Canada.

出版信息

Transfusion. 2019 Apr;59(4):1267-1272. doi: 10.1111/trf.15132. Epub 2019 Jan 4.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Some countries impose an upper age limit on whole blood and double RBC donation while others do not. We evaluated the safety of blood donation in older individuals (≥71 years), and their contribution to the blood supply of five countries.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Twelve blood center members of the Biomedical Excellence for Safer Transfusion (BEST) Collaborative from four countries with no upper age limit for whole blood and double RBC donation (Canada, New Zealand, England, and the United States) or an upper age limit of 80 (Australia) provided 2016 data on donors and donations, deferral rates, and vasovagal reactions by donor age and sex. Donors under age 24 were included in the number of total donors and donations, but not in deferral and reaction rate comparisons.

RESULTS

Older donors accounted for 1.0% (New Zealand) to 4.3% (United States) of donors, and 1.5% (New Zealand) to 5.6% (United States) of donations; most were between ages 71 and 76. The deferral rate was higher in older compared to 24- to 70-year-old males, but very similar between older and younger females. In contrast, vasovagal reaction rates were either lower (male donors) or similar (female donor for reactions with loss of consciousness) in older compared to 24- to 70-year-old donors.

CONCLUSIONS

Exclusion solely based on older age appears to be unwarranted based on safety concerns such as donor reactions. Healthy older individuals can continue to safely donate and make a significant contribution to the blood supply past arbitrary age limits.

摘要

背景

一些国家对全血和双份红细胞献血规定了年龄上限,而另一些国家则没有。我们评估了年龄较大(≥71 岁)个体献血的安全性,以及他们对五个国家血液供应的贡献。

研究设计和方法

来自四个国家的 12 名血液中心成员(加拿大、新西兰、英国和美国)或有全血和双份红细胞献血年龄上限(80 岁)的两个国家(澳大利亚)的生物医学卓越安全输血(BEST)合作组织成员提供了 2016 年关于献血者和献血量、延期率以及按献血者年龄和性别分类的血管迷走神经反应的数据。24 岁以下的献血者包括在总献血者和献血量中,但不包括延期率和反应率的比较。

结果

年龄较大的献血者占献血者的 1.0%(新西兰)至 4.3%(美国),占献血量的 1.5%(新西兰)至 5.6%(美国);大多数年龄在 71 至 76 岁之间。与 24 至 70 岁男性相比,年龄较大的献血者延期率较高,但与年轻女性相比非常相似。相比之下,血管迷走神经反应率在年龄较大的献血者中要么较低(男性献血者),要么与 24 至 70 岁的献血者相似(女性献血者发生意识丧失的反应)。

结论

仅基于年龄较大而排除献血者似乎没有充分的理由,因为安全问题(如献血者反应)。健康的老年人可以继续安全地献血,并为超过任意年龄限制的血液供应做出重大贡献。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验