Pan Dong-Ni, Wang Yi, Li Xuebing
Key laboratory of Mental Health, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences.
Neuropsychology. 2019 Jan;33(1):111-122. doi: 10.1037/neu0000471.
Previous studies have employed self-report measures to investigate emotion regulation (ER) strategy biases in individuals with anxiety. We investigated the neural signatures underlying ER strategy biases.
Twenty individuals with high trait anxiety (HTA) and twenty individuals with low trait anxiety (LTA) completed both the Emotion Regulation Questionnaire and ER tasks. During the tasks, participants were required to passively view, reappraise, and suppress expression while viewing negative images. Event-related potential (ERP) indexes: P2 (an early positive component of the latency around 200ms) and late positive potential (LPP) were adopted to examine the reliability of ER strategy bias in early and later stages during ER procedure.
Results of the questionnaire indicated that trait anxiety level was positively correlated with habitual suppression use. ERP results revealed that, in LTA individuals, P2 amplitudes were reduced during both reappraisal and suppression strategy use. HTA individuals, however, showed no significant differences in P2 amplitudes between passive-view and regulation conditions. Furthermore, during the reappraisal block, a reduction of LPP was only observed in the LTA group, while HTA individuals showed a relatively more pronounced reduction in LPP during the application of the suppression strategy.
Individuals in the HTA group do not demonstrate the application of effectively strategies during the initial stages of ER process, perhaps due to the presence of an automatic negative bias. While during the later stages of ER, HTA individuals demonstrated successful use of suppression but were deficient in voluntarily applying reappraisal techniques. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).
以往研究采用自我报告测量方法来探究焦虑个体的情绪调节(ER)策略偏差。我们研究了ER策略偏差背后的神经特征。
20名高特质焦虑(HTA)个体和20名低特质焦虑(LTA)个体完成了情绪调节问卷和ER任务。在任务过程中,参与者在观看负面图像时被要求被动观看、重新评价和抑制表情。采用事件相关电位(ERP)指标:P2(潜伏期约200毫秒的早期正成分)和晚期正电位(LPP)来检验ER过程中早期和后期ER策略偏差的可靠性。
问卷结果表明,特质焦虑水平与习惯性抑制使用呈正相关。ERP结果显示,在LTA个体中,重新评价和抑制策略使用期间P2波幅均降低。然而,HTA个体在被动观看和调节条件下P2波幅无显著差异。此外,在重新评价阶段,仅在LTA组中观察到LPP降低,而HTA个体在应用抑制策略期间LPP降低相对更明显。
HTA组个体在ER过程的初始阶段未表现出有效策略的应用,可能是由于存在自动负性偏差。而在ER的后期阶段,HTA个体表现出成功使用抑制策略,但在自愿应用重新评价技术方面存在不足。(PsycINFO数据库记录(c)2019美国心理学会,保留所有权利)