Zhou Mengni, Tian Cheng, Cao Rui, Wang Bin, Niu Yan, Hu Ting, Guo Hao, Xiang Jie
College of Information and Computer Science, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan, China.
Software College, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan, China.
Front Neuroinform. 2018 Dec 10;12:95. doi: 10.3389/fninf.2018.00095. eCollection 2018.
Epilepsy is a neurological disorder that affects approximately fifty million people according to the World Health Organization. While electroencephalography (EEG) plays important roles in monitoring the brain activity of patients with epilepsy and diagnosing epilepsy, an expert is needed to analyze all EEG recordings to detect epileptic activity. This method is obviously time-consuming and tedious, and a timely and accurate diagnosis of epilepsy is essential to initiate antiepileptic drug therapy and subsequently reduce the risk of future seizures and seizure-related complications. In this study, a convolutional neural network (CNN) based on raw EEG signals instead of manual feature extraction was used to distinguish ictal, preictal, and interictal segments for epileptic seizure detection. We compared the performances of time and frequency domain signals in the detection of epileptic signals based on the intracranial Freiburg and scalp CHB-MIT databases to explore the potential of these parameters. Three types of experiments involving two binary classification problems (interictal vs. preictal and interictal vs. ictal) and one three-class problem (interictal vs. preictal vs. ictal) were conducted to explore the feasibility of this method. Using frequency domain signals in the Freiburg database, average accuracies of 96.7, 95.4, and 92.3% were obtained for the three experiments, while the average accuracies for detection in the CHB-MIT database were 95.6, 97.5, and 93% in the three experiments. Using time domain signals in the Freiburg database, the average accuracies were 91.1, 83.8, and 85.1% in the three experiments, while the signal detection accuracies in the CHB-MIT database were only 59.5, 62.3, and 47.9% in the three experiments. Based on these results, the three cases are effectively detected using frequency domain signals. However, the effective identification of the three cases using time domain signals as input samples is achieved for only some patients. Overall, the classification accuracies of frequency domain signals are significantly increased compared to time domain signals. In addition, frequency domain signals have greater potential than time domain signals for CNN applications.
根据世界卫生组织的数据,癫痫是一种影响约五千万人的神经系统疾病。虽然脑电图(EEG)在监测癫痫患者的大脑活动和诊断癫痫方面发挥着重要作用,但需要专家分析所有EEG记录以检测癫痫活动。这种方法显然既耗时又繁琐,而及时准确地诊断癫痫对于启动抗癫痫药物治疗并随后降低未来癫痫发作及与发作相关并发症的风险至关重要。在本研究中,使用基于原始EEG信号而非手动特征提取的卷积神经网络(CNN)来区分癫痫发作期、发作前期和发作间期片段以进行癫痫发作检测。我们基于颅内弗赖堡和头皮CHB - MIT数据库比较了时域和频域信号在癫痫信号检测中的性能,以探索这些参数的潜力。进行了三种类型的实验,涉及两个二分类问题(发作间期与发作前期以及发作间期与发作期)和一个三分类问题(发作间期与发作前期与发作期),以探索该方法的可行性。在弗赖堡数据库中使用频域信号时,三个实验的平均准确率分别为96.7%、95.4%和92.3%,而在CHB - MIT数据库中三个实验的检测平均准确率分别为95.6%、97.5%和93%。在弗赖堡数据库中使用时域信号时,三个实验的平均准确率分别为91.1%、83.8%和85.1%,而在CHB - MIT数据库中三个实验的信号检测准确率仅为59.5%、62.3%和47.9%。基于这些结果,使用频域信号可有效检测这三种情况。然而,仅对部分患者实现了将时域信号作为输入样本有效识别这三种情况。总体而言,与时域信号相比,频域信号的分类准确率显著提高。此外,频域信号在CNN应用中比时域信号具有更大的潜力。