CHU Limoges, Hôpital Dupuytren, Service Cardiologie, INSERM 1094, Limoges, France.
UZ Brussel-CVHZ, Brussels, Belgium.
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019 Jan;12(1):84-92. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2018.11.005.
In this individual participant data meta-analysis on left ventricular global longitudinal strain (LVGLS), our objective was to: 1) describe its distribution; 2) identify the most predictive cutoff values; and 3) assess its impact on mortality in asymptomatic patients with significant aortic stenosis (AS) and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF).
The evidence supporting the prognostic role of LVGLS in asymptomatic patients with AS has been obtained from several relatively small studies.
A literature search was performed for studies published between 2005 and 2017 without language restriction according to the following criteria: "aortic stenosis" AND "longitudinal strain." The corresponding authors of selected studies were contacted and invited to share their data that we computerized in a specific database. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality.
Among the 10 studies included, 1,067 asymptomatic patients with significant AS and LVEF >50% were analyzed. The median of LVGLS was 16.2% (from 5.6% to 30.1%). There were 91 deaths reported during follow-up with median of 1.8 (0.9 to 2.8) years, resulting in a pooled crude mortality rate of 8.5%. The LVGLS performed well in the prediction of death (area under the curve: 0.68). The best cutoff value identified was LVGLS of 14.7% (sensitivity, 60%; specificity, 70%). Using random effects model, the risk of death for patients with LVGLS <14.7% is multiplied by >2.5 (hazard ratio: 2.62; 95% confidence interval: 1.66 to 4.13; p < 0.0001), without significant heterogeneity between studies (I = 18.3%; p = 0.275). The relationship between LVGLS and mortality remained significant in patients with LVEF ≥60% (p = 0.001).
This individual participant data meta-analysis demonstrates that in asymptomatic patients with significant AS and normal LVEF, impaired LVGLS is associated with reduced survival. These data emphasize the potential usefulness of LVGLS for risk stratification and management of these patients.
在这项针对左心室整体纵向应变(LVGLS)的个体参与者数据荟萃分析中,我们的目的是:1)描述其分布;2)确定最具预测价值的截断值;3)评估其对射血分数保留的无症状严重主动脉瓣狭窄(AS)患者的死亡率的影响。
支持无症状 AS 患者 LVGLS 预后作用的证据来自几项相对较小的研究。
根据以下标准,对 2005 年至 2017 年期间发表的文献进行了无语言限制的搜索:“主动脉瓣狭窄”和“纵向应变”。联系选定研究的相应作者,并邀请他们分享我们在特定数据库中计算机化的数据。主要终点是全因死亡率。
在纳入的 10 项研究中,分析了 1067 例无症状严重 AS 和射血分数>50%的患者。LVGLS 的中位数为 16.2%(5.6%至 30.1%)。在随访期间报告了 91 例死亡,中位随访时间为 1.8(0.9 至 2.8)年,总死亡率为 8.5%。LVGLS 能很好地预测死亡(曲线下面积:0.68)。确定的最佳截断值为 LVGLS 14.7%(敏感性,60%;特异性,70%)。使用随机效应模型,LVGLS<14.7%的患者死亡风险增加>2.5 倍(风险比:2.62;95%置信区间:1.66 至 4.13;p<0.0001),研究间无显著异质性(I=18.3%;p=0.275)。LVGLS 与死亡率之间的关系在射血分数≥60%的患者中仍然显著(p=0.001)。
这项个体参与者数据荟萃分析表明,在无症状严重 AS 和正常射血分数的患者中,LVGLS 受损与生存率降低相关。这些数据强调了 LVGLS 对这些患者的风险分层和管理的潜在有用性。