Department of Biological Sciences, University of Southern California , Los Angeles, California.
Department of Oral Anatomy and Development, Osaka University Graduate School of Dentistry , Osaka , Japan.
Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2019 May 1;316(5):R448-R462. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.00255.2018. Epub 2019 Jan 9.
Simple sugars are thought to elicit a unitary sensation, principally via the "sweet" taste receptor type 1 taste receptor (T1R)2+T1R3, yet we previously found that rats with experience consuming two metabolically distinct sugars, glucose and fructose, subsequently licked more for glucose than fructose, even when postingestive influences were abated. The results pointed to the existence of an orosensory receptor that binds one sugar but not the other and whose signal is channeled into neural circuits that motivate ingestion. Here we sought to determine the chemosensory nature of this signal. First, we assessed whether T1R2 and/or T1R3 are necessary to acquire this behavioral discrimination, replicating our rat study in T1R2+T1R3 double-knockout (KO) mice and their wild-type counterparts as well as in two common mouse strains that vary in their sensitivity to sweeteners [C57BL/6 (B6) and 129X1/SvJ (129)]. These studies showed that extensive exposure to multiple concentrations of glucose and fructose in daily one-bottle 30-min sessions enhanced lick responses for glucose over fructose in brief-access tests. This was true even for KO mice that lacked the canonical "sweet" taste receptor. Surgical disconnection of olfactory inputs to the forebrain (bulbotomy) in B6 mice severely disrupted the ability to express this experience-dependent sugar discrimination. Importantly, these bulbotomized B6 mice exhibited severely blunted responsiveness to both sugars relative to water in brief-access lick tests, despite the fact that they have intact T1R2+T1R3 receptors. The results highlight the importance of other sources of chemosensory and postingestive inputs in shaping and maintaining "hardwired" responses to sugar.
简单糖被认为通过“甜”味受体类型 1 味觉受体(T1R)2+T1R3 产生单一感觉,但我们之前发现,经历过两种代谢上不同的糖(葡萄糖和果糖)的大鼠随后对葡萄糖的舔舐多于果糖,即使消除了餐后影响。结果表明存在一种口味觉受体,它结合一种糖而不结合另一种糖,其信号被引导到促进摄入的神经回路中。在这里,我们试图确定这种信号的化学感觉性质。首先,我们评估了 T1R2 和/或 T1R3 是否是获得这种行为辨别所必需的,在 T1R2+T1R3 双敲除(KO)小鼠及其野生型对照以及两种对甜味剂敏感性不同的常见小鼠品系(C57BL/6(B6)和 129X1/SvJ(129))中复制了我们的大鼠研究。这些研究表明,在每日 30 分钟的单瓶实验中,大量暴露于多种浓度的葡萄糖和果糖可增强对葡萄糖的舔舐反应,而不是果糖。这对缺乏典型“甜”味受体的 KO 小鼠也是如此。B6 小鼠的嗅球前脑的手术切断(嗅球切除术)严重破坏了表达这种经验依赖性糖辨别能力。重要的是,与水相比,这些嗅球切除术的 B6 小鼠在短暂访问舔舐测试中对两种糖的反应明显减弱,尽管它们有完整的 T1R2+T1R3 受体。结果强调了其他化学感觉和餐后输入源在塑造和维持对糖的“硬连线”反应中的重要性。