Treesukosol Yada, Spector Alan C
Department of Psychology and Program in Neuroscience, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL 32306, USA.
Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2012 Jul 15;303(2):R218-35. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.00089.2012. Epub 2012 May 23.
Evidence in the literature supports the hypothesis that the T1R2+3 heterodimer binds to compounds that humans describe as sweet. Here, we assessed the necessity of the T1R2 and T1R3 subunits in the maintenance of normal taste sensitivity to carbohydrate stimuli. We trained and tested water-restricted T1R2 knockout (KO), T1R3 KO and their wild-type (WT) same-sex littermate controls in a two-response operant procedure to sample a fluid and differentially respond on the basis of whether the stimulus was water or a tastant. Correct responses were reinforced with water and incorrect responses were punished with a time-out. Testing was conducted with a modified descending method of limits procedure across daily 25-min sessions. Both KO groups displayed severely impaired performance and markedly decreased sensitivity when required to discriminate water from sucrose, glucose, or maltose. In contrast, when Polycose was tested, KO mice had normal EC(50) values for their psychometric functions, with some slight, but significant, impairment in performance. Sensitivity to NaCl did not differ between these mice and their WT controls. Our findings support the view that the T1R2+3 heterodimer is the principal receptor that mediates taste detection of natural sweeteners, but not of all carbohydrate stimuli. The combined presence of T1R2 and T1R3 appears unnecessary for the maintenance of relatively normal sensitivity to Polycose, at least in this task. Some detectability of sugars at high concentrations might be mediated by the putative polysaccharide taste receptor, the remaining T1R subunit forming either a homodimer or heteromer with another protein(s), or nontaste orosensory cues.
文献中的证据支持这样一种假说,即T1R2+3异源二聚体与人类描述为甜的化合物结合。在此,我们评估了T1R2和T1R3亚基在维持对碳水化合物刺激的正常味觉敏感性中的必要性。我们在一种双反应操作性程序中对限水的T1R2基因敲除(KO)小鼠、T1R3基因敲除小鼠及其野生型(WT)同性同窝对照进行训练和测试,以使其摄取一种液体,并根据刺激物是水还是味觉剂做出不同反应。正确反应给予水强化,错误反应给予超时惩罚。测试采用改良的极限法递减程序,每天进行25分钟的实验。当需要区分水与蔗糖、葡萄糖或麦芽糖时,两个基因敲除组均表现出严重受损的行为表现和明显降低的敏感性。相比之下,当测试聚葡萄糖时,基因敲除小鼠心理测量函数的半数有效浓度(EC50)值正常,行为表现有一些轻微但显著的受损。这些小鼠对氯化钠的敏感性与其野生型对照没有差异。我们的研究结果支持这样一种观点,即T1R2+3异源二聚体是介导天然甜味剂味觉检测的主要受体,但并非所有碳水化合物刺激的主要受体。至少在这项任务中,T1R2和T1R3的共同存在对于维持对聚葡萄糖相对正常的敏感性似乎并非必要。高浓度糖的一些可检测性可能由假定的多糖味觉受体介导,剩余的T1R亚基与另一种蛋白质形成同二聚体或异聚体,或者由非味觉口感觉线索介导。