• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Digital Exclusion Among Mental Health Service Users: Qualitative Investigation.心理健康服务使用者中的数字排斥:定性调查
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Jan 9;21(1):e11696. doi: 10.2196/11696.
2
Impact of Digital Inclusion Initiative to Facilitate Access to Mental Health Services: Service User Interview Study.数字包容倡议对促进心理健康服务获取的影响:服务使用者访谈研究。
JMIR Ment Health. 2024 Jul 26;11:e51315. doi: 10.2196/51315.
3
Do We Still Have a Digital Divide in Mental Health? A Five-Year Survey Follow-up.我们在心理健康方面是否仍存在数字鸿沟?一项为期五年的调查随访。
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Nov 22;18(11):e309. doi: 10.2196/jmir.6511.
4
A call for digital inclusion initiatives in mental health services: An integrative review.呼吁在心理健康服务中开展数字包容倡议:一项综合综述。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2023 Oct;30(5):911-941. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12931. Epub 2023 Apr 6.
5
Facilitators of and Barriers to the Use of a Digital Self-Management Service for Diagnostic Testing: Focus Group Study With Potential Users.促进和阻碍使用数字自我管理服务进行诊断检测的因素:对潜在用户的焦点小组研究。
JMIR Hum Factors. 2024 May 10;11:e45115. doi: 10.2196/45115.
6
Perspectives of Policy Makers and Service Users Concerning the Implementation of eHealth in Sweden: Interview Study.政策制定者和服务使用者对瑞典电子健康实施的看法:访谈研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Jan 28;24(1):e28870. doi: 10.2196/28870.
7
From Digital Inclusion to Digital Transformation in the Prevention of Drug-Related Deaths in Scotland: Qualitative Study.从数字包容到数字转型:苏格兰预防药物相关死亡的定性研究
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Sep 24;26:e52345. doi: 10.2196/52345.
8
Service Attributes and Acceptability of Digital and Nondigital Depression Management Methods Among Individuals With Depressive Symptoms: Survey Study.有抑郁症状个体对数字和非数字抑郁管理方法的服务属性及可接受性:调查研究
JMIR Form Res. 2024 Dec 19;8:e55450. doi: 10.2196/55450.
9
A qualitative exploration of service user views about using digital health interventions for self-management in severe mental health problems.服务用户对使用数字健康干预措施进行严重精神健康问题自我管理的看法的定性探索。
BMC Psychiatry. 2019 Jan 21;19(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s12888-018-1979-1.
10
Exploring Stakeholder Perspectives on the Barriers and Facilitators of Implementing Digital Technologies for Heart Disease Diagnosis: Qualitative Study.探索利益相关者对实施心脏病诊断数字技术的障碍和促进因素的看法:定性研究
JMIR Cardio. 2025 Mar 5;9:e66464. doi: 10.2196/66464.

引用本文的文献

1
Feasibility of Wearable Devices for Motivating Post-Stroke Patients.可穿戴设备对中风后患者的激励作用的可行性
Sensors (Basel). 2025 Aug 21;25(16):5204. doi: 10.3390/s25165204.
2
Telepsychiatry in Africa: overcoming barriers to access and care.非洲的远程精神病学:克服获取和护理方面的障碍。
Discov Ment Health. 2025 Apr 29;5(1):64. doi: 10.1007/s44192-025-00197-3.
3
Patterns of Internet Use in People Diagnosed With Severe Mental Illness: Qualitative Interview Study.重度精神疾病患者的互联网使用模式:定性访谈研究
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Mar 28;27:e55072. doi: 10.2196/55072.
4
Digital mental health service engagement changes during Covid-19 in children and young people across the UK: Presenting concerns, service activity, and access by gender, ethnicity, and deprivation.英国儿童和青少年在新冠疫情期间数字心理健康服务参与情况的变化:呈现的问题、服务活动以及按性别、种族和贫困程度划分的获取情况。
PLoS One. 2025 Feb 13;20(2):e0316468. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0316468. eCollection 2025.
5
Assessment attendance and treatment engagement with talking and internet-enabled therapies of people with and without a long-term physical health condition: analysis of Talking Therapies service data.对患有和未患有长期身体健康状况的人群进行谈话疗法和互联网辅助疗法的评估、参与情况及治疗效果:谈话疗法服务数据分析
BJPsych Open. 2025 Feb 11;11(2):e31. doi: 10.1192/bjo.2024.846.
6
Improving the Utility, Safety, and Ethical Use of a Passive Mood-Tracking App for People With Bipolar Disorder Using Coproduction: Qualitative Focus Group Study.通过合作生产提高双相情感障碍患者被动情绪追踪应用程序的实用性、安全性和伦理使用:定性焦点小组研究
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Feb 7;9:e65140. doi: 10.2196/65140.
7
Dimensions and Subcategories of Digital Maturity in General Practice: Qualitative Study.全科医疗中数字成熟度的维度与子类别:定性研究
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Dec 19;26:e57786. doi: 10.2196/57786.
8
Exploring the implementation of a novel, transdiagnostic, hybrid ecological momentary intervention for improving resilience in youth (EMIcompass): A process evaluation in the realist framework.探索一种新型的、跨诊断的、混合式生态瞬时干预措施以提高青少年恢复力(EMIcompass)的实施情况:基于现实主义框架的过程评估
Psychol Psychother. 2025 Mar;98(1):103-132. doi: 10.1111/papt.12565. Epub 2024 Dec 19.
9
Effectiveness and Experience of Implementing Digital Interventions to Promote Smoking Cessation Among Adults With Severe Mental Illness: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.实施数字干预措施促进重度精神疾病成年人戒烟的有效性和经验:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2025 May 22;27(6):951-961. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntae237.
10
Environmental Factors for Sustained Telehealth Use in Mental Health Services: A Mixed Methods Analysis.心理健康服务中持续使用远程医疗的环境因素:一项混合方法分析
Int J Telemed Appl. 2024 Sep 16;2024:8835933. doi: 10.1155/2024/8835933. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Social determinants of mental disorders and the Sustainable Development Goals: a systematic review of reviews.精神障碍的社会决定因素与可持续发展目标:一项综述的系统评价
Lancet Psychiatry. 2018 Apr;5(4):357-369. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(18)30060-9.
2
Switched on or switched off? A survey of mobile, computer and Internet use in a community mental health rehabilitation sample.开着还是关着?一项社区心理健康康复样本中移动、计算机和互联网使用情况的调查。
J Ment Health. 2019 Feb;28(1):4-10. doi: 10.1080/09638237.2017.1340623. Epub 2017 Jul 4.
3
Do We Still Have a Digital Divide in Mental Health? A Five-Year Survey Follow-up.我们在心理健康方面是否仍存在数字鸿沟?一项为期五年的调查随访。
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Nov 22;18(11):e309. doi: 10.2196/jmir.6511.
4
Over promised, over-sold and underperforming? - e-health in mental health.过度承诺、过度推销且表现不佳?——心理健康领域的电子健康
J Ment Health. 2016;25(1):1-4. doi: 10.3109/09638237.2015.1124406. Epub 2016 Jan 6.
5
Technological innovations in mental healthcare: harnessing the digital revolution.精神健康保健领域的技术创新:利用数字革命。
Br J Psychiatry. 2015 Apr;206(4):263-5. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.113.142612.
6
Income inequality and health: a causal review.收入不平等与健康:因果关系述评。
Soc Sci Med. 2015 Mar;128:316-26. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.12.031. Epub 2014 Dec 30.
7
Purposeful Sampling for Qualitative Data Collection and Analysis in Mixed Method Implementation Research.混合方法实施研究中定性数据收集与分析的目的抽样法
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2015 Sep;42(5):533-44. doi: 10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y.
8
Older people and digital disengagement: a fourth digital divide?老年人与数字脱节:第四道数字鸿沟?
Gerontology. 2013;59(6):564-70. doi: 10.1159/000353630. Epub 2013 Aug 20.
9
Can't surf, won't surf: the digital divide in mental health.无法冲浪,也不愿冲浪:心理健康领域的数字鸿沟。
J Ment Health. 2012 Aug;21(4):395-403. doi: 10.3109/09638237.2012.689437. Epub 2012 Jun 19.
10
Diffusion of Technology: Frequency of Use for Younger and Older Adults.技术传播:年轻人和老年人的使用频率
Ageing Int. 2011 Mar;36(1):123-145. doi: 10.1007/s12126-010-9077-9.

心理健康服务使用者中的数字排斥:定性调查

Digital Exclusion Among Mental Health Service Users: Qualitative Investigation.

作者信息

Greer Ben, Robotham Dan, Simblett Sara, Curtis Hannah, Griffiths Helena, Wykes Til

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.

National Institute for Health Research Maudsley Biomedical Research Centre, South London and Maudsley National Health Service Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.

出版信息

J Med Internet Res. 2019 Jan 9;21(1):e11696. doi: 10.2196/11696.

DOI:10.2196/11696
PMID:30626564
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6329420/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Access to internet-enabled technology and Web-based services has grown exponentially in recent decades. This growth potentially excludes some communities and individuals with mental health difficulties, who face a heightened risk of digital exclusion. However, it is unclear what factors may contribute to digital exclusion in this population.

OBJECTIVE

To explore in detail the problems of digital exclusion in mental health service users and potential facilitators to overcome them.

METHODS

We conducted semistructured interviews with 20 mental health service users who were deemed digitally excluded. We recruited the participants from a large secondary mental health provider in South London, United Kingdom. We employed thematic analysis to identify themes and subthemes relating to historical and extant reasons for digital exclusion and methods of overcoming it.

RESULTS

There were three major themes that appeared to maintain digital exclusion: a perceived lack of knowledge, being unable to access the necessary technology and services owing to personal circumstances, and the barriers presented by mental health difficulties. Specific facilitators for overcoming digital exclusion included intrinsic motivation and a personalized learning format that reflects the individual's unique needs and preferences.

CONCLUSIONS

Multiple factors contribute to digital exclusion among mental health service users, including material deprivation and mental health difficulties. This means that efforts to overcome digital exclusion must address the multiple deprivations individuals may face in the offline world in addition to their individual mental health needs. Additional facilitators include fostering an intrinsic motivation to overcome digital exclusion and providing a personalized learning format tailored to the individual's knowledge gaps and preferred learning style.

摘要

背景

近几十年来,使用互联网技术和基于网络的服务的机会呈指数级增长。这种增长可能会将一些有心理健康问题的社区和个人排除在外,他们面临着更高的数字排斥风险。然而,尚不清楚哪些因素可能导致这一人群的数字排斥。

目的

详细探讨心理健康服务使用者中的数字排斥问题以及克服这些问题的潜在促进因素。

方法

我们对20名被认为存在数字排斥的心理健康服务使用者进行了半结构化访谈。我们从英国伦敦南部的一家大型二级心理健康服务机构招募了参与者。我们采用主题分析法来确定与数字排斥的历史和现存原因以及克服数字排斥的方法相关的主题和子主题。

结果

出现了三个似乎维持数字排斥的主要主题:感知到的知识匮乏、由于个人情况无法获得必要的技术和服务以及心理健康问题带来的障碍。克服数字排斥的具体促进因素包括内在动机和反映个人独特需求和偏好的个性化学习形式。

结论

多种因素导致心理健康服务使用者中的数字排斥,包括物质匮乏和心理健康问题。这意味着克服数字排斥的努力除了要满足个人的心理健康需求外,还必须解决个人在现实世界中可能面临的多种匮乏。其他促进因素包括培养克服数字排斥的内在动机,以及根据个人的知识差距和偏好的学习方式提供个性化的学习形式。