• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

三款当代细胞清洗机应急程序的质量评估

Quality evaluation of the emergency program of three contemporary cell-washing machines.

作者信息

De Somer Filip, Bernolet Hendrik, Bouchez Stefaan, Bové Thierry

机构信息

1 Laboratory for Experimental Cardiac Surgery, Ghent University, Belgium.

2 Department of Cardiac Surgery, University Hospital Ghent, Belgium.

出版信息

Perfusion. 2019 May;34(4):318-322. doi: 10.1177/0267659118819927. Epub 2019 Jan 10.

DOI:10.1177/0267659118819927
PMID:30628532
Abstract

This study evaluates the efficiency of emergency programs used by three contemporary cell washers. Both time necessary to process a given amount of blood and quality of the processed blood are investigated. The Fresenius Kabi Smart, Haemonetics Elite and LivaNova Xtra were validated using bovine blood, with a starting hematocrit of 13% or 21%. For all devices, the pre-programmed emergency program was used. The total volume processed in the 13% hematocrit group was 358 ± 68 mL for Fresenius, 375 ± 308 mL for Haemonetics and 497 ± 87 mL for LivaNova. In the 21% hematocrit group, the volumes were 533 ± 60 mL, 713 ± 142 mL and 798 ± 96 mL, respectively, showing a statistical difference between the Fresenius and LivaNova (p = 0.02). In the 13% hematocrit group, the Fresenius processed 45 ± 15 mL blood/min, the Haemonetics 62 ± 8 mL blood/min and the LivaNova 66 ± 1.5 mL blood/min. The difference between the Fresenius and LivaNova was statistically significant (p = 0.04). In the 21% hematocrit group, the processing speed was 69 ± 4 mL blood/min, 62 ± 8 mL blood/min and 77 ± 5 mL blood/min for the Fresenius, LivaNova and Haemonetics, respectively (p = 0.25). No major differences in the elimination of potassium, albumin and total protein or in hemolytic index were observed. No major differences were observed between discontinuous and continuous systems with respect to processing speed and wash quality with a starting hematocrit of 21%. Minor differences in processing speed were observed with a starting hematocrit of 13%.

摘要

本研究评估了三种当代细胞洗涤器所使用的应急程序的效率。研究了处理给定血量所需的时间以及处理后血液的质量。使用起始血细胞比容为13%或21%的牛血对费森尤斯卡比智能型、海莫奈蒂克斯精英型和利瓦诺瓦Xtra型进行了验证。对于所有设备,均使用预编程的应急程序。在血细胞比容为13%的组中,费森尤斯处理的总量为358±68 mL,海莫奈蒂克斯为375±308 mL,利瓦诺瓦为497±87 mL。在血细胞比容为21%的组中,处理量分别为533±60 mL、713±142 mL和798±96 mL,费森尤斯和利瓦诺瓦之间存在统计学差异(p = 0.02)。在血细胞比容为13%的组中,费森尤斯每分钟处理45±15 mL血液,海莫奈蒂克斯为62±8 mL血液/分钟,利瓦诺瓦为66±1.5 mL血液/分钟。费森尤斯和利瓦诺瓦之间的差异具有统计学意义(p = 0.04)。在血细胞比容为21%的组中,费森尤斯、利瓦诺瓦和海莫奈蒂克斯的处理速度分别为69±4 mL血液/分钟、62±8 mL血液/分钟和77±5 mL血液/分钟(p = 0.25)。在钾、白蛋白和总蛋白的清除或溶血指数方面未观察到重大差异。对于起始血细胞比容为21%的情况,在处理速度和洗涤质量方面,连续系统和非连续系统之间未观察到重大差异。对于起始血细胞比容为13%的情况,观察到了处理速度上的微小差异。

相似文献

1
Quality evaluation of the emergency program of three contemporary cell-washing machines.三款当代细胞清洗机应急程序的质量评估
Perfusion. 2019 May;34(4):318-322. doi: 10.1177/0267659118819927. Epub 2019 Jan 10.
2
The impact of bowl size, program setup, and blood hematocrit on the performance of a discontinuous autotransfusion system.碗的大小、程序设置和血液血细胞比容对间断性自体输血系统性能的影响。
Transfusion. 2017 Mar;57(3):589-598. doi: 10.1111/trf.13954. Epub 2017 Feb 24.
3
Evaluation of the minimum volume of salvage blood required for the successful use of two different autotransfusion devices.评估成功使用两种不同自体输血装置所需的最低回收血量。
Paediatr Anaesth. 2015 Mar;25(3):258-64. doi: 10.1111/pan.12535. Epub 2014 Sep 30.
4
Quick biochemical markers for assessment of quality control of intraoperative cell salvage: a prospective observational study.用于评估术中细胞回收质量控制的快速生化标志物:一项前瞻性观察研究。
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2014 May 14;9:86. doi: 10.1186/1749-8090-9-86.
5
Processing of small volumes in blood salvage devices.血液回收装置中小容量血液的处理
Transfusion. 2014 Oct;54(10 Pt 2):2775-81. doi: 10.1111/trf.12765. Epub 2014 Jun 23.
6
Partial bowls using the Haemonetics Cell Saver 5: does it produce a quality product?使用Haemonetics Cell Saver 5进行部分回输:它能生产出高质量的产品吗?
J Extra Corpor Technol. 2005 Jun;37(2):161-4.
7
In Vitro Evaluation of the Fresenius Kabi CATSmart Autotransfusion System.费森尤斯卡比CATSmart自体输血系统的体外评估
J Extra Corpor Technol. 2017 Jun;49(2):107-111.
8
Washing of banked blood by three different blood salvage devices.三种不同的血液回收装置对保存血的洗涤。
Transfusion. 2013 May;53(5):1001-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2012.03853.x. Epub 2012 Aug 15.
9
Comparison of three autotransfusion devices for utilization in the pediatric population.三种自动输血装置在儿科人群中的应用比较。
Perfusion. 2021 Jan;36(1):57-62. doi: 10.1177/0267659120921090. Epub 2020 May 30.
10
Fat removal during cell salvage: an optimized program for a discontinuous autotransfusion device.细胞回收过程中的脂肪去除:一种用于间断式自体输血装置的优化方案。
Transfusion. 2016 Jan;56(1):153-9. doi: 10.1111/trf.13286. Epub 2015 Aug 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative evaluation of two autotransfusion devices in a 72h survival swine model of surgically induced controlled splenic bleeding.两种自体输血装置在手术诱导的可控性脾出血72小时存活猪模型中的比较评估
PLoS One. 2025 May 5;20(5):e0322568. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0322568. eCollection 2025.
2
The effectiveness of cell salvage in extracorporeal circulation surgeries in relation to use of health resources after use: A systematic review and meta-analysis.体外循环手术中自体血回输在使用后与卫生资源利用相关的有效性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Heliyon. 2024 Apr 27;10(9):e30459. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e30459. eCollection 2024 May 15.
3
A novel autotransfusion device saving erythrocytes and platelets used in a 72 h survival swine model of surgically induced controlled blood loss.
一种新型的自体输血装置,可在手术诱导控制性失血的 72 小时存活猪模型中保存红细胞和血小板。
PLoS One. 2022 Mar 24;17(3):e0260855. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260855. eCollection 2022.