• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

估算孤儿药与非孤儿药药物研发的临床成本。

Estimating the clinical cost of drug development for orphan versus non-orphan drugs.

机构信息

Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.

Department of Economics, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.

出版信息

Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2019 Jan 10;14(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s13023-018-0990-4.

DOI:10.1186/s13023-018-0990-4
PMID:30630499
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6327525/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

High orphan drug prices have gained the attention of payers and policy makers. These prices may reflect the need to recoup the cost of drug development from a small patient pool. However, estimates of the cost of orphan drug development are sparse.

METHODS

Using publicly available data, we estimated the differences in trial characteristics and clinical development costs with 100 orphan and 100 non-orphan drugs.

RESULTS

We found that the out-of-pocket clinical costs per approved orphan drug to be $166 million and $291 million (2013 USD) per non-orphan drug. The capitalized clinical costs per approved orphan drug and non-orphan drug were estimated to be $291 million and $412 million respectively. When focusing on new molecular entities only, we found that the capitalized clinical cost per approved orphan drug was half that of a non-orphan drug.

CONCLUSIONS

More discussion is needed to better align on which cost components should be included in research and development costs for pharmaceuticals.

摘要

背景

高孤儿药价格引起了支付者和政策制定者的关注。这些价格可能反映了从一个小患者群体中收回药物开发成本的需要。然而,孤儿药开发成本的估计数据很少。

方法

我们使用公开数据,估计了 100 种孤儿药和 100 种非孤儿药在临床试验特征和临床开发成本方面的差异。

结果

我们发现,每批准一种孤儿药的自费临床成本为 1.66 亿美元,每批准一种非孤儿药的临床成本为 2.91 亿美元(2013 年美元)。每批准一种孤儿药和非孤儿药的资本化临床成本估计分别为 2.91 亿美元和 4.12 亿美元。当仅关注新分子实体时,我们发现,每批准一种孤儿药的资本化临床成本是非孤儿药的一半。

结论

需要进行更多的讨论,以更好地协调应将哪些成本因素纳入药品研发成本。

相似文献

1
Estimating the clinical cost of drug development for orphan versus non-orphan drugs.估算孤儿药与非孤儿药药物研发的临床成本。
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2019 Jan 10;14(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s13023-018-0990-4.
2
Pharmaceutical expenditure on drugs for rare diseases in Canada: a historical (2007-13) and prospective (2014-18) MIDAS sales data analysis.加拿大罕见病药物的药品支出:一项基于MIDAS销售数据的历史(2007 - 2013年)及前瞻性(2014 - 2018年)分析
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2016 May 21;11(1):68. doi: 10.1186/s13023-016-0450-y.
3
Determinants of orphan drugs prices in France: a regression analysis.法国孤儿药价格的决定因素:一项回归分析。
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2017 Apr 21;12(1):75. doi: 10.1186/s13023-016-0561-5.
4
The actual status of drug prices and adjustment factors for drug price calculation: an analysis of ultra-orphan drug development in Japan.药品价格的实际状况及药品价格计算的调整因素:日本超罕用药开发分析。
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2022 Nov 8;17(1):408. doi: 10.1186/s13023-022-02526-z.
5
Estimating the budget impact of orphan medicines in Europe: 2010 - 2020.估算欧洲孤儿药的预算影响:2010-2020 年。
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2011 Sep 27;6:62. doi: 10.1186/1750-1172-6-62.
6
Pricing and reimbursement of orphan drugs: the need for more transparency.孤儿药的定价和报销:需要提高透明度。
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2011 Jun 17;6:42. doi: 10.1186/1750-1172-6-42.
7
Affordability Challenges to Value-Based Pricing: Mass Diseases, Orphan Diseases, and Cures.基于价值定价的可负担性挑战:大规模疾病、罕见病与治愈方法
Value Health. 2018 Mar;21(3):252-257. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2017.12.018.
8
[Drugs for rare diseases: the blessing of being orphans.].[罕见病药物:因“孤儿身份”而得的福祉。]
Recenti Prog Med. 2019 May;110(5):221-229. doi: 10.1701/3163.31444.
9
New drugs carry hefty price tags. Makers of leading-edge orphan products asked to cut prices, take smaller profits.新药价格高昂。前沿孤儿药产品的制造商被要求降价,获取更少的利润。
Mod Healthc. 2013 Oct 7;43(40):14.
10
A review of international coverage and pricing strategies for personalized medicine and orphan drugs.国际范围内个体化药物和孤儿药的覆盖范围和定价策略综述
Health Policy. 2017 Dec;121(12):1240-1248. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2017.09.005. Epub 2017 Sep 29.

引用本文的文献

1
A Framework for Considering the Role of the Public Sector in R&D of Health Technology.一个关于公共部门在卫生技术研发中作用的考量框架。
Pharmaceut Med. 2025 Aug 8. doi: 10.1007/s40290-025-00576-9.
2
Research and development investments for biologics independently developed by US biotechnology startups, 2017-2023.2017 - 2023年美国生物技术初创公司自主研发生物制品的研发投资情况
Health Aff Sch. 2025 Jul 25;3(7):qxaf139. doi: 10.1093/haschl/qxaf139. eCollection 2025 Jul.
3
Cost and Duration of Clinical Trials in Drug Development by Japanese Pharmaceutical Companies.

本文引用的文献

1
Research and Development Spending to Bring a Single Cancer Drug to Market and Revenues After Approval.研发一种抗癌药物上市的支出及获批后的收入。
JAMA Intern Med. 2017 Nov 1;177(11):1569-1575. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.3601.
2
Innovation in the pharmaceutical industry: New estimates of R&D costs.制药行业的创新:研发成本的新估计
J Health Econ. 2016 May;47:20-33. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2016.01.012. Epub 2016 Feb 12.
3
A comparison of interventional clinical trials in rare versus non-rare diseases: an analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov.
日本制药公司药物研发临床试验的成本与持续时间。
Pharmaceut Med. 2025 Apr 11. doi: 10.1007/s40290-025-00558-x.
4
Reforming the innovation system to deliver affordable medicines: a conceptual framework of pharmaceutical innovation as a complex adaptive system (forest) and theory of change.改革创新体系以提供可负担药品:作为复杂适应系统(森林)的药物创新概念框架及变革理论。
J Pharm Policy Pract. 2025 Jan 16;18(1):2436899. doi: 10.1080/20523211.2024.2436899. eCollection 2025.
5
Use of Clinical Trial Characteristics to Estimate Costs of New Drug Development.利用临床试验特征估算新药研发成本。
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Jan 2;8(1):e2453275. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.53275.
6
Costs of Drug Development and Research and Development Intensity in the US, 2000-2018.2000-2018 年美国药品研发成本和研发强度
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Jun 3;7(6):e2415445. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.15445.
7
Special FDA designations for drug development: orphan, fast track, accelerated approval, priority review, and breakthrough therapy.药物研发的特殊 FDA 认定:孤儿药、快速通道、加速批准、优先审评和突破性疗法。
Eur J Health Econ. 2024 Aug;25(6):979-997. doi: 10.1007/s10198-023-01639-x. Epub 2023 Nov 14.
8
The long-term impact and value of curative therapy for HIV: a modelling analysis.长效治疗对 HIV 的长期影响和价值:建模分析。
J Int AIDS Soc. 2023 Sep;26(9):e26170. doi: 10.1002/jia2.26170.
9
Financing repurposed drugs for rare diseases: a case study of Unravel Biosciences.为罕见病重新利用药物提供资金:以 Unravel Biosciences 为例。
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2023 Sep 12;18(1):287. doi: 10.1186/s13023-023-02753-y.
10
The Application of Evidence-Based Medicine in Individualized Medicine.循证医学在个体化医疗中的应用。
Biomedicines. 2023 Jun 23;11(7):1793. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines11071793.
罕见病与非罕见病介入性临床试验的比较:对美国国立医学图书馆临床试验数据库的分析
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2014 Nov 26;9:170. doi: 10.1186/s13023-014-0170-0.
4
The pricing of breakthrough drugs: theory and policy implications.突破性药物的定价:理论与政策影响
PLoS One. 2014 Nov 25;9(11):e113894. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0113894. eCollection 2014.
5
The evolving drug development landscape: from blockbusters to niche busters in the orphan drug space.不断演变的药物研发格局:从畅销药到孤儿药领域的小众突破药。
Drug Dev Res. 2014 Jun;75(4):231-4. doi: 10.1002/ddr.21176. Epub 2014 May 14.
6
Clinical development success rates for investigational drugs.研究性药物的临床开发成功率。
Nat Biotechnol. 2014 Jan;32(1):40-51. doi: 10.1038/nbt.2786.
7
Pricing for orphan drugs: will the market bear what society cannot?罕见病药物定价:市场能否承受社会所不能承受之重?
JAMA. 2013 Oct 2;310(13):1343-4. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.278129.
8
Characteristics of clinical trials registered in ClinicalTrials.gov, 2007-2010.2007-2010 年 ClinicalTrials.gov 注册临床试验的特征。
JAMA. 2012 May 2;307(17):1838-47. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.3424.
9
Orphan drug development: an economically viable strategy for biopharma R&D.孤儿药开发:生物制药研发的经济可行策略。
Drug Discov Today. 2012 Jul;17(13-14):660-4. doi: 10.1016/j.drudis.2012.02.005. Epub 2012 Feb 17.
10
Pricing and reimbursement of orphan drugs: the need for more transparency.孤儿药的定价和报销:需要提高透明度。
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2011 Jun 17;6:42. doi: 10.1186/1750-1172-6-42.