Division of Gastroenterology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
Division of Gastroenterology, Zeidler Ledcor Centre, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Dig Dis Sci. 2019 Jun;64(6):1668-1671. doi: 10.1007/s10620-018-5450-4. Epub 2019 Jan 10.
The risk of a new Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) after FMT is unknown if non-CDI antibiotics are required. It is uncertain if anti-CDI prophylaxis or probiotics would reduce risk. We therefore aimed to compare the risk of CDI with and without antibiotic exposure and the benefit of concomitant anti-CDI antibiotic or probiotic prophylaxis.
This is a multicenter retrospective study carried out at three large FMT referral centers of patients who underwent FMT for recurrent CDI. Patients were assessed for antibiotic use, as well as concomitant use of prophylactic anti-CDI antibiotics or probiotics. Time to CDI recurrence after FMT was evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method.
A total of 404 patients were included: 63% were females, with a mean age of 61.3 ± 18.8 years. Mean length of post-FMT follow-up was 18.1 ± 11.9 months (range 2.2-45.2). Among the entire cohort 8.1% (n = 33) experienced a CDI recurrence. Overall, 111 patients (27.4%) used a non-CDI antibiotic, of which 16.2% (n = 18) experienced a CDI recurrence. Patients who used non-CDI antibiotics were more likely to develop CDI (HR 8.44, 95% CI 4.21-16.93, p < 0.001). The risk of CDI recurrence was not different between patients who received anti-CDI antibiotic prophylaxis to those who did not (HR = 1.88, 95% CI 0.72-4.86, p = 0.2); however, probiotic prophylaxis was associated with a greater risk of CDI recurrence (HR = 2.65, 95% CI 1.02-6.86, p = 0.045).
Non-CDI antibiotic use was not uncommon after successful FMT and significantly increased the risk of a new episode of CDI. In this study, we found that the prophylactic use of anti-CDI antibiotics or probiotics was not protective.
如果需要使用非艰难梭菌感染(CDI)抗生素,那么在粪便微生物移植(FMT)后发生新的 CDI 的风险尚不清楚。使用抗 CDI 预防用药或益生菌是否会降低风险尚不确定。因此,我们旨在比较有无抗生素暴露时 CDI 的风险,以及同时使用抗 CDI 抗生素或益生菌预防用药的益处。
这是一项在三家大型 FMT 转诊中心进行的多中心回顾性研究,研究对象为接受 FMT 治疗复发性 CDI 的患者。评估患者的抗生素使用情况,以及同时使用预防性抗 CDI 抗生素或益生菌的情况。使用 Kaplan-Meier 方法评估 FMT 后 CDI 复发的时间。
共纳入 404 例患者:63%为女性,平均年龄为 61.3±18.8 岁。FMT 后中位随访时间为 18.1±11.9 个月(范围 2.2-45.2)。整个队列中有 8.1%(n=33)发生 CDI 复发。总体而言,111 例(27.4%)患者使用了非 CDI 抗生素,其中 16.2%(n=18)发生 CDI 复发。使用非 CDI 抗生素的患者更有可能发生 CDI(HR 8.44,95%CI 4.21-16.93,p<0.001)。与未接受抗 CDI 抗生素预防治疗的患者相比,接受抗 CDI 抗生素预防治疗的患者 CDI 复发的风险并无差异(HR=1.88,95%CI 0.72-4.86,p=0.2);然而,益生菌预防治疗与 CDI 复发的风险增加相关(HR=2.65,95%CI 1.02-6.86,p=0.045)。
在 FMT 成功后,非 CDI 抗生素的使用并不少见,且显著增加了新发作 CDI 的风险。在这项研究中,我们发现抗 CDI 抗生素或益生菌的预防性使用并不能起到保护作用。