Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin; the Center for Outcomes Research and the Division of Neonatology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, and the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Feb;133(2):261-268. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003080.
To evaluate the effect of obstetric delivery volume, high-risk condition volume, and their combined effect on maternal outcomes.
This retrospective cohort study examined more than 10 million deliveries in three states from 1995 to 2009 using linked birth-hospital discharge records. Surgical high-risk patients had one of three prenatally identifiable conditions; the high-risk medical cohort had 1 or more of 14 complicating diagnoses. Hospitals were divided into quartiles of total obstetric delivery volume and tertiles of high-risk patient volume. The primary outcome was a composite outcome of severe maternal morbidity identified by International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification, codes. Data were controlled for nonindependence using clustering by hospital and results were adjusted for patient and hospital level factors.
We identified 142,194 high-risk surgical deliveries and 1,322,276 high-risk medical deliveries for evaluation. Among surgical high-risk patients, higher hospital total obstetric delivery volume was associated with 22% decreased risk for maternal morbidity (4th quartile adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 0.78; 95% CI 0.64-0.94); likewise for medical high-risk patients, higher total delivery volume was associated with a 28% decreased risk (4th quartile AOR 0.72; 95% CI 0.59-0.86). Conversely, as the volume of medical high-risk patients at hospitals increased, the AOR for severe morbidity increased (AOR=1.27, 95% CI 1.10-1.48). There was a significant interaction effect of both types of volume on maternal complications for both surgical (likelihood ratio [LR] χ=18.2, P=.006) and medical high-risk patients (LR χ=99.4, P<.001).
Patients with high-risk medical and surgical conditions had decreasing adverse maternal outcomes as total obstetric delivery volume increased. There were increased odds of adverse maternal outcomes in centers with high volumes of high-risk patients. These two types of volume had significant combined effect on maternal risk. Both types of volume should be considered in assessing hospital obstetric performance.
评估产科分娩量、高危病例量及其综合效应对产妇结局的影响。
本回顾性队列研究使用链接的分娩-医院出院记录,对 1995 年至 2009 年三个州的 1000 多万例分娩进行了研究。手术高危患者具有三种产前可识别的情况之一;高危医疗队列具有 14 种合并诊断中的 1 种或多种。医院按产科分娩总量分为四等分,高危患者量分为三分位。主要结局是国际疾病分类,第 9 版临床修正版代码确定的严重产妇发病率的复合结局。使用医院聚类控制数据的非独立性,结果根据患者和医院水平因素进行调整。
我们确定了 142194 例手术高危分娩和 1322276 例高危医疗分娩进行评估。在手术高危患者中,医院产科总分娩量较高与产妇发病率降低 22%相关(第四四分位数调整后的比值比[OR]0.78;95%可信区间 0.64-0.94);对于高危医疗患者也是如此,总分娩量较高与发病率降低 28%相关(第四四分位数 OR 0.72;95%可信区间 0.59-0.86)。相反,随着医院高危医疗患者数量的增加,严重发病的 OR 增加(OR=1.27,95%可信区间 1.10-1.48)。两种类型的体积对手术(似然比[LR] χ=18.2,P=.006)和高危医疗患者(LR χ=99.4,P<.001)的产妇并发症都有显著的交互效应。
高危手术和高危医疗患者的产科分娩量增加,产妇不良结局的发生率降低。在高危患者数量较高的中心,产妇不良结局的发生几率增加。这两种类型的体积对产妇风险有显著的综合影响。在评估医院产科表现时,应同时考虑这两种类型的体积。