• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

将社会层面纳入环境项目的规划、管理和评估中。

Incorporating social dimensions in planning, managing and evaluating environmental projects.

机构信息

Office of Environment and Heritage New South Wales (OEH), W001, University of New England, Trevenna Road, Armidale, New South Wales (NSW), 2351, Australia.

School of Environmental and Rural Science, University of New England, Armidale, NSW, 2351, Australia.

出版信息

Environ Manage. 2019 Feb;63(2):215-232. doi: 10.1007/s00267-018-01131-w. Epub 2019 Jan 11.

DOI:10.1007/s00267-018-01131-w
PMID:30635681
Abstract

Most conservation research aims to inform management of environmental challenges, but scientific evidence is used inconsistently in environmental programmes and practice. We used semi-structured retrospective interviews to ask 12 environmental scientists and 14 practitioners (land managers, park rangers, project managers and planners from natural resource management agencies) about factors that facilitated and hindered the use of scientific input during 15 environmental projects. We used the common factors from interviews to develop a process model describing how scientific input informs programmes and practice. The model emphasised the social dimensions of environmental projects which are often overlooked when these projects are planned, managed and evaluated. It highlighted the pivotal role of relationships in achieving outcomes which include creating practical, useful products and tools, and robust, credible and trusted evidence. By clarifying the process of how scientific knowledge informs environmental programmes and practice, the model enabled us to provide guidance about how to undertake transdisciplinary work and suggest indicators to track progress. Although derived from environmental projects, the guidance is likely to apply to other fields, particularly where different disciplines work together.

摘要

大多数保护研究旨在为环境挑战的管理提供信息,但科学证据在环境计划和实践中并没有得到一致的应用。我们使用半结构化的回顾性访谈,询问了 12 名环境科学家和 14 名从业者(来自自然资源管理机构的土地管理者、公园管理员、项目经理和规划师),了解在 15 个环境项目中促进和阻碍科学投入使用的因素。我们使用访谈中的常见因素来开发一个过程模型,描述科学投入如何为方案和实践提供信息。该模型强调了环境项目的社会层面,而这些项目在规划、管理和评估时往往被忽视。它突出了关系在实现包括创造实用、有用的产品和工具以及可靠、可信和值得信赖的证据在内的成果方面的关键作用。通过阐明科学知识为环境方案和实践提供信息的过程,该模型使我们能够提供关于如何进行跨学科工作的指导,并提出跟踪进展的指标。虽然该指导是从环境项目中得出的,但它可能适用于其他领域,特别是在不同学科合作的情况下。

相似文献

1
Incorporating social dimensions in planning, managing and evaluating environmental projects.将社会层面纳入环境项目的规划、管理和评估中。
Environ Manage. 2019 Feb;63(2):215-232. doi: 10.1007/s00267-018-01131-w. Epub 2019 Jan 11.
2
Mainstreaming the social sciences in conservation.将社会科学纳入保护工作的主流。
Conserv Biol. 2017 Feb;31(1):56-66. doi: 10.1111/cobi.12788. Epub 2016 Jul 22.
3
The case for embedding researchers in conservation agencies.倡导研究人员融入保护机构。
Conserv Biol. 2019 Dec;33(6):1266-1274. doi: 10.1111/cobi.13324. Epub 2019 May 22.
4
Five principles for the practice of knowledge exchange in environmental management.环境管理中知识交流实践的五项原则。
J Environ Manage. 2014 Dec 15;146:337-345. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.07.021. Epub 2014 Sep 6.
5
Conservation planning as a transdisciplinary process.保护规划作为一个跨学科的过程。
Conserv Biol. 2010 Aug;24(4):957-65. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2010.01497.x. Epub 2010 Mar 24.
6
Using social-network research to improve outcomes in natural resource management.利用社交网络研究改善自然资源管理成果。
Conserv Biol. 2019 Feb;33(1):53-65. doi: 10.1111/cobi.13127. Epub 2018 Aug 29.
7
From science to action: Principles for undertaking environmental research that enables knowledge exchange and evidence-based decision-making.从科学到行动:开展环境研究以促进知识交流和循证决策的原则。
J Environ Manage. 2016 Dec 1;183(Pt 3):864-874. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.09.038. Epub 2016 Sep 21.
8
Conservation genetics: Linking science with practice.保护遗传学:将科学与实践联系起来。
Mol Ecol. 2019 Sep;28(17):3848-3856. doi: 10.1111/mec.15202. Epub 2019 Sep 2.
9
Chinese villages and their sustainable future: the European Union-China-Research Project "SUCCESS".中国乡村及其可持续未来:欧盟-中国研究项目“SUCCESS”
J Environ Manage. 2008 Apr;87(2):204-15. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.06.012. Epub 2007 Sep 20.
10
Identifying climate risk perceptions, information needs, and barriers to information exchange among public land managers.识别公共土地管理者的气候风险认知、信息需求以及信息交流障碍。
Sci Total Environ. 2018 Mar;616-617:245-254. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.11.015. Epub 2017 Nov 5.

本文引用的文献

1
A conceptual framework for understanding the perspectives on the causes of the science-practice gap in ecology and conservation.理解生态学和保护学中科学实践差距成因观点的概念框架。
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2018 May;93(2):1032-1055. doi: 10.1111/brv.12385. Epub 2017 Nov 20.
2
Equity trade-offs in conservation decision making.保护决策中的公平权衡。
Conserv Biol. 2018 Apr;32(2):294-303. doi: 10.1111/cobi.13008. Epub 2017 Oct 23.
3
A roadmap for knowledge exchange and mobilization research in conservation and natural resource management.
保护与自然资源管理中知识交流与传播研究路线图。
Conserv Biol. 2017 Aug;31(4):789-798. doi: 10.1111/cobi.12857. Epub 2017 Feb 9.
4
How do potential knowledge users evaluate new claims about a contested resource? Problems of power and politics in knowledge exchange and mobilization.潜在的知识使用者如何评估关于有争议资源的新主张?知识交流与传播中的权力和政治问题。
J Environ Manage. 2016 Dec 15;184(Pt 2):380-388. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.10.006. Epub 2016 Oct 10.
5
Organising evidence for environmental management decisions: a '4S' hierarchy.组织环境管理决策的证据:一个“4S”层次结构。
Trends Ecol Evol. 2014 Nov;29(11):607-13. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2014.09.004. Epub 2014 Oct 1.
6
A systematic review of barriers to and facilitators of the use of evidence by policymakers.政策制定者使用证据的障碍与促进因素的系统评价
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Jan 3;14:2. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-2.
7
Bridging the gap between science and decision making.弥合科学与决策之间的差距。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Aug 20;110 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):14055-61. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1213532110. Epub 2013 Aug 12.
8
Bridges, brokers and boundary spanners in collaborative networks: a systematic review.协作网络中的桥梁、中介和边界跨越者:系统综述。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2013 Apr 30;13:158. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-158.
9
Achieving conservation science that bridges the knowledge-action boundary.实现连接知识与行动边界的保护科学。
Conserv Biol. 2013 Aug;27(4):669-78. doi: 10.1111/cobi.12050. Epub 2013 Apr 10.
10
Galvanizers, guides, champions, and shields: the many ways that policymakers use public health researchers.镀锌工、引导者、拥护者和捍卫者:政策制定者利用公共卫生研究人员的多种方式。
Milbank Q. 2011 Dec;89(4):564-98. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2011.00643.x.