Banerjee Aniruddha, Khurana Mona, Sachidanandam Ramya, Sen Parveen
Elite School of Optometry, Unit of Medical Research Foundation, Chennai, India.
Srimathi Sundari Subramanian Department of Visual Psychophysics, Sankara Nethralaya, Chennai, India.
Doc Ophthalmol. 2019 Feb;138(1):21-33. doi: 10.1007/s10633-018-09668-1. Epub 2019 Jan 12.
A prospective, cross-sectional, case-control study was conducted to investigate the role of broadband and monochromatic photopic negative response (PhNR) of the full-field flash electroretinogram (ERG) in the evaluation of ganglion cell damage in primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) subjects.
Subjects with POAG and age-matched normal subjects were recruited from the outpatient department of a tertiary eye care center in South India. A total of 25 patients with POAG and 50 age-matched normal subjects were recruited. ERG was recorded using broadband (3.5 cd.s/m white stimulus on 10 cd/m white background) and monochromatic (3.5 cd.s/m red stimulus on 10 cd/m blue background and 1 cd.s/m blue stimulus on 10 cd/m yellow background) stimuli.
The reduction in PhNR amplitude in POAG compared to normal individuals was higher in red-on-blue PhNR [26.37 µV; p < 0.001, confidence interval (CI) 19.34 to 33.4] as compared to broadband stimuli (16.41 µV; p < 0.001, CI 8.68 to 24.13), and blue on yellow (21.96 µV; p < 0.001, CI 10.12 to 33.8). Red-on-blue PhNR amplitudes correlated better with mean deviation (MD; r = - 0.66, p < 0.05), pattern standard deviation (PSD; r = - 0.4, p = 0.04), visual field index (VFI; r = - 0.58, p < 0.05), and retinal nerve fiber layer thickness (r = - 0.67, p < 0.05) in comparison with broadband and monochromatic blue-on-yellow PhNR. Receiver operating characteristic curve revealed largest area under the curve (0.89) in red-on-blue PhNR compared to broadband (0.76) and blue on yellow (0.74). The sensitivity and specificity was also higher in red-on-blue PhNR (72% and 80%, respectively) as compared to the other stimuli (sensitivity and specificity of broadband 0.68 and 0.7, blue on yellow 0.64 and 0.7, respectively).
Correlation of PhNR with Humphrey visual field parameters and retinal nerve fiber layer thickness showed that red-on-blue PhNR can be a useful additional tool for clinical assessment of retinal ganglion cell dysfunction in glaucoma patients. Red-on-blue PhNR was more sensitive as compared to white-on-white and blue-on-yellow PhNR in identifying ganglion cell dysfunction and correlates well with other structural and functional tests for glaucoma such as MD, PSD, VFI, and RNFL thickness.
进行一项前瞻性、横断面、病例对照研究,以探讨全视野闪光视网膜电图(ERG)的宽带和单色明视负反应(PhNR)在原发性开角型青光眼(POAG)患者神经节细胞损伤评估中的作用。
从印度南部一家三级眼科护理中心的门诊部招募POAG患者和年龄匹配的正常受试者。共招募了25例POAG患者和50名年龄匹配的正常受试者。使用宽带(在10 cd/m白色背景上3.5 cd.s/m白色刺激)和单色(在10 cd/m蓝色背景上3.5 cd.s/m红色刺激以及在10 cd/m黄色背景上1 cd.s/m蓝色刺激)刺激记录ERG。
与正常个体相比,POAG患者中,红色对蓝色PhNR的PhNR振幅降低幅度(26.37 μV;p < 0.001,置信区间[CI] 19.34至33.4)高于宽带刺激(16.41 μV;p < 0.001,CI 8.68至24.13)以及黄色对蓝色刺激(21.96 μV;p < 0.001,CI 10.12至33.8)。与宽带和单色黄色对蓝色PhNR相比,红色对蓝色PhNR振幅与平均偏差(MD;r = - 0.66,p < 0.05)、模式标准差(PSD;r = - 0.4,p = 0.04)、视野指数(VFI;r = - 0.58,p < 0.05)以及视网膜神经纤维层厚度(r = - 0.67,p < 0.05)的相关性更好。受试者工作特征曲线显示,红色对蓝色PhNR的曲线下面积最大(0.89),高于宽带刺激(0.76)和黄色对蓝色刺激(0.74)。红色对蓝色PhNR的敏感性和特异性也高于其他刺激(宽带刺激的敏感性和特异性分别为0.68和0.7,黄色对蓝色刺激的敏感性和特异性分别为0.64和0.7)。
PhNR与Humphrey视野参数和视网膜神经纤维层厚度的相关性表明,红色对蓝色PhNR可作为青光眼患者视网膜神经节细胞功能障碍临床评估的有用辅助工具。与白色对白色和黄色对蓝色PhNR相比,红色对蓝色PhNR在识别神经节细胞功能障碍方面更敏感,并且与青光眼的其他结构和功能检查(如MD、PSD、VFI和RNFL厚度)相关性良好。