• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

具有非正态能力和猜测参数的修正平行分析

Revised Parallel Analysis With Nonnormal Ability and a Guessing Parameter.

作者信息

DeMars Christine E

机构信息

James Madison University, Harrisonburg, VA, USA.

出版信息

Educ Psychol Meas. 2019 Feb;79(1):151-169. doi: 10.1177/0013164418767009. Epub 2018 Apr 1.

DOI:10.1177/0013164418767009
PMID:30636786
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6318748/
Abstract

Previous work showing that revised parallel analysis can be effective with dichotomous items has used a two-parameter model and normally distributed abilities. In this study, both two- and three-parameter models were used with normally distributed and skewed ability distributions. Relatively minor skew and kurtosis in the underlying ability distribution had almost no effect on Type I error for unidimensional data and reduced power for two-dimensional data slightly with smaller sample sizes of 400. Using a two-parameter model on three-parameter data produced dramatically increased rejection rates for the unidimensional data. Using the correct three-parameter model reduced the unidimensional rejection rates but yielded lower power than the two-parameter data in some conditions.

摘要

先前的研究表明,修正平行分析对于二分项目是有效的,这些研究使用的是双参数模型和正态分布的能力。在本研究中,双参数模型和三参数模型都被用于正态分布和偏态能力分布。潜在能力分布中相对较小的偏度和峰度对一维数据的I型错误几乎没有影响,而对于二维数据,在样本量为400的较小样本情况下,会略微降低检验效能。在三参数数据上使用双参数模型会使一维数据的拒绝率大幅增加。使用正确的三参数模型会降低一维数据的拒绝率,但在某些情况下,其检验效能低于双参数数据。

相似文献

1
Revised Parallel Analysis With Nonnormal Ability and a Guessing Parameter.具有非正态能力和猜测参数的修正平行分析
Educ Psychol Meas. 2019 Feb;79(1):151-169. doi: 10.1177/0013164418767009. Epub 2018 Apr 1.
2
Growth Mixture Modeling With Nonnormal Distributions: Implications for Data Transformation.具有非正态分布的生长混合模型:对数据转换的影响
Educ Psychol Meas. 2021 Aug;81(4):698-727. doi: 10.1177/0013164420976773. Epub 2020 Dec 8.
3
Parameter Recovery in Multidimensional Item Response Theory Models Under Complexity and Nonnormality.复杂与非正态条件下多维项目反应理论模型中的参数恢复
Appl Psychol Meas. 2017 Oct;41(7):530-544. doi: 10.1177/0146621617707507. Epub 2017 May 11.
4
Examining Nonnormal Latent Variable Distributions for Non-Ignorable Missing Data.针对不可忽视的缺失数据检验非正态潜在变量分布
Appl Psychol Meas. 2021 May;45(3):159-177. doi: 10.1177/0146621621990753. Epub 2021 Feb 4.
5
Investigating the Impact of Item Parameter Drift for Item Response Theory Models with Mixture Distributions.研究项目参数漂移对具有混合分布的项目反应理论模型的影响。
Front Psychol. 2016 Feb 24;7:255. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00255. eCollection 2016.
6
Detection Rates of the M Test for Nonzero Lower Asymptotes Under Normal and Nonnormal Ability Distributions in the Applications of IRT.在IRT应用中,正态和非正态能力分布下非零下限渐近线的M检验检出率
Appl Psychol Meas. 2019 Jan;43(1):84-88. doi: 10.1177/0146621618768291. Epub 2018 Apr 18.
7
[The estimation of premorbid intelligence levels in French speakers].[法语使用者病前智力水平的评估]
Encephale. 2005 Jan-Feb;31(1 Pt 1):31-43. doi: 10.1016/s0013-7006(05)82370-x.
8
Consequences of Ignoring Guessing Effects on Measurement Invariance Analysis.忽略猜测效应在测量不变性分析中的后果。
Appl Psychol Meas. 2021 Jun;45(4):283-296. doi: 10.1177/01466216211013915. Epub 2021 May 17.
9
Identification of the 1PL model with guessing parameter: parametric and semi-parametric results.具有猜测参数的1PL模型的识别:参数和半参数结果。
Psychometrika. 2013 Apr;78(2):341-79. doi: 10.1007/s11336-013-9322-8. Epub 2013 Feb 1.
10
Examining the Robustness of the Graded Response and 2-Parameter Logistic Models to Violations of Construct Normality.检验分级反应模型和双参数逻辑模型对建构正态性违背的稳健性。
Educ Psychol Meas. 2022 Oct;82(5):967-988. doi: 10.1177/00131644211063453. Epub 2022 Jan 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Item Parameter Recovery: Sensitivity to Prior Distribution.项目参数恢复:对先验分布的敏感性。
Educ Psychol Meas. 2024 Aug;84(4):691-715. doi: 10.1177/00131644231203688. Epub 2023 Oct 30.
2
Assessing Dimensionality of IRT Models Using Traditional and Revised Parallel Analyses.使用传统和修订后的平行分析评估IRT模型的维度
Educ Psychol Meas. 2023 Jun;83(3):609-629. doi: 10.1177/00131644221111838. Epub 2022 Jul 21.
3
The Effect of Latent and Error Non-Normality on Measures of Fit in Structural Equation Modeling.潜在和误差非正态性对结构方程模型拟合度测量的影响
Educ Psychol Meas. 2022 Oct;82(5):911-937. doi: 10.1177/00131644211046201. Epub 2021 Sep 20.
4
Searching for G: A New Evaluation of SPM-LS Dimensionality.寻找G:对SPM-LS维度的新评估。
J Intell. 2019 Jun 28;7(3):14. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence7030014.

本文引用的文献

1
Proportion of Indicator Common Variance Due to a Factor as an Effect Size Statistic in Revised Parallel Analysis.在修订的平行分析中,作为效应量统计量的由一个因素导致的指标共同方差比例。
Educ Psychol Meas. 2019 Feb;79(1):85-107. doi: 10.1177/0013164418754611. Epub 2018 Feb 7.
2
Accuracy of Revised and Traditional Parallel Analyses for Assessing Dimensionality with Binary Data.用于评估二元数据维度的修订版和传统平行分析的准确性。
Educ Psychol Meas. 2016 Feb;76(1):5-21. doi: 10.1177/0013164415581898. Epub 2015 Apr 21.
3
Type I and Type II Error Rates and Overall Accuracy of the Revised Parallel Analysis Method for Determining the Number of Factors.用于确定因子数量的修订平行分析方法的I型和II型错误率及总体准确性。
Educ Psychol Meas. 2015 Jun;75(3):428-457. doi: 10.1177/0013164414546566. Epub 2014 Aug 14.
4
An Empirical Study of Various Indices for Determining Unidimensionality.确定单维度性的各种指标的实证研究。
Multivariate Behav Res. 1984 Jan 1;19(1):49-78. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr1901_3.
5
The Assessment of Dimensionality for Use in Item Response Theory.用于项目反应理论的维度评估
Multivariate Behav Res. 1991 Oct 1;26(4):765-92. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr2604_9.
6
An empirical evaluation of alternative methods of estimation for confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data.对有序数据验证性因子分析的替代估计方法的实证评估。
Psychol Methods. 2004 Dec;9(4):466-91. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.9.4.466.
7
A RATIONALE AND TEST FOR THE NUMBER OF FACTORS IN FACTOR ANALYSIS.因子分析中因子数量的基本原理与检验
Psychometrika. 1965 Jun;30:179-85. doi: 10.1007/BF02289447.