• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

构建并验证一个预测模型以评估 III-IV 期肺鳞癌一线化疗的疗效和预后。

Development and validation of a prognostic index for efficacy evaluation and prognosis of first-line chemotherapy in stage III-IV lung squamous cell carcinoma.

机构信息

School of Medical Informatics, China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, China.

Department of Medical Oncology, The First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, 110001, Liaoning, China.

出版信息

Eur Radiol. 2019 May;29(5):2388-2398. doi: 10.1007/s00330-018-5912-2. Epub 2019 Jan 14.

DOI:10.1007/s00330-018-5912-2
PMID:30643941
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6443600/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To establish a pre-therapy prognostic index model (PIM) of the first-line chemotherapy aiming to achieve accurate prediction of time to progression (TTP) and overall survival among the patients diagnosed with locally advanced (stage III) or distant metastasis (stage IV) lung squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC).

METHODS

Ninety-six LSCC patients treated with first-line chemotherapy were retrospectively enrolled to build the model. Fourteen epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutant LSCC patients treated with first-line EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy were enrolled for validation dataset. From CT images, 56,000 phenotype features were initially computed. PIM was constructed by integrating a CT phenotype signature selected by the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator and the significant blood-based biomarkers selected by multivariate Cox regression. PIM was then compared with other four prognostic models constructed by the CT phenotype signature, clinical factors, post-therapy tumor response, and Glasgow Prognostic Score.

RESULTS

The signature includes eight optimal features extracted from co-occurrence, run length, and Gabor features. By using PIM, chemotherapy efficacy of patients categorized in the low-risk, intermediate-risk, and high-risk progression subgroups (median TTP = 7.2 months, 3.4 months, and 1.8 months, respectively) was significantly different (p < 0.0001, log-rank test). Chemotherapy efficacy of the low-risk progression subgroup was comparable with EGFR-TKI therapy (p = 0.835, log-rank test). Prognostic prediction of chemotherapy efficacy by PIM was significantly higher than other models (p < 0.05, z test).

CONCLUSION

The study demonstrated that the PIM yielded significantly higher performance to identify individual stage III-IV LSCC patients who can potentially benefit most from first-line chemotherapy, and predict the risk of failure from chemotherapy for individual patients.

KEY POINTS

• TTP and OS of first-line chemotherapy in individual stage III-IV LSCC patients could be predicted by pre-therapy blood-based biomarkers and image-based signatures. • Risk status of pre-therapy indicators affected the efficacy of first-line chemotherapy in stage III-IV LSCC patients. • Those stage III-IV LSCC patients who were able to achieve similar efficacy to EGFR-TKI therapy through chemotherapy were identified.

摘要

目的

建立一线化疗的治疗前预后指数模型(PIM),旨在准确预测局部晚期(III 期)或远处转移(IV 期)肺鳞状细胞癌(LSCC)患者的疾病进展时间(TTP)和总生存期。

方法

回顾性纳入 96 例接受一线化疗的 LSCC 患者建立模型。纳入 14 例接受一线表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)突变 LSCC 患者接受一线 EGFR 酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(TKI)治疗的患者作为验证数据集。从 CT 图像中,最初计算了 56,000 个表型特征。通过整合由最小绝对收缩和选择算子选择的 CT 表型特征和由多元 Cox 回归选择的显著血液生物标志物来构建 PIM。然后,将 PIM 与通过 CT 表型特征、临床因素、治疗后肿瘤反应和格拉斯哥预后评分构建的其他四个预后模型进行比较。

结果

该特征包括从共现、运行长度和 Gabor 特征中提取的八个最佳特征。使用 PIM,在低风险、中风险和高风险进展亚组中,患者的化疗疗效(中位 TTP=7.2 个月、3.4 个月和 1.8 个月)有显著差异(p<0.0001,对数秩检验)。低风险进展亚组的化疗疗效与 EGFR-TKI 治疗相当(p=0.835,对数秩检验)。PIM 对化疗疗效的预后预测明显优于其他模型(p<0.05,z 检验)。

结论

该研究表明,PIM 可显著提高识别最有可能从一线化疗中获益的个体 III-IV 期 LSCC 患者的性能,并预测个体患者化疗失败的风险。

关键点

  1. TTP 和 OS 可通过个体 III-IV 期 LSCC 患者的一线化疗前血生物标志物和图像特征来预测。

  2. 治疗前指标的风险状况影响 III-IV 期 LSCC 患者一线化疗的疗效。

  3. 确定了能够通过化疗达到与 EGFR-TKI 治疗相似疗效的 III-IV 期 LSCC 患者。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee4c/6443600/bad36789c954/330_2018_5912_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee4c/6443600/4662db071334/330_2018_5912_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee4c/6443600/bb05c4f2f3a5/330_2018_5912_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee4c/6443600/2864ff19836f/330_2018_5912_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee4c/6443600/0907ec5b2861/330_2018_5912_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee4c/6443600/bad36789c954/330_2018_5912_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee4c/6443600/4662db071334/330_2018_5912_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee4c/6443600/bb05c4f2f3a5/330_2018_5912_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee4c/6443600/2864ff19836f/330_2018_5912_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee4c/6443600/0907ec5b2861/330_2018_5912_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee4c/6443600/bad36789c954/330_2018_5912_Fig5_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Development and validation of a prognostic index for efficacy evaluation and prognosis of first-line chemotherapy in stage III-IV lung squamous cell carcinoma.构建并验证一个预测模型以评估 III-IV 期肺鳞癌一线化疗的疗效和预后。
Eur Radiol. 2019 May;29(5):2388-2398. doi: 10.1007/s00330-018-5912-2. Epub 2019 Jan 14.
2
Development and Validation of a Machine Learning Model to Explore Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Response in Patients With Stage IV EGFR Variant-Positive Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.开发和验证一种机器学习模型,以探索 IV 期 EGFR 突变阳性非小细胞肺癌患者对酪氨酸激酶抑制剂的反应。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Dec 1;3(12):e2030442. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.30442.
3
Characteristics and overall survival of EGFR mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer treated with EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors: a retrospective analysis for 1660 Japanese patients.表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)酪氨酸激酶抑制剂治疗EGFR突变阳性非小细胞肺癌的特征及总生存期:对1660例日本患者的回顾性分析
Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2016 May;46(5):462-7. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyw014. Epub 2016 Mar 13.
4
Comparison of the efficacies of first-generation epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors for brain metastasis in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer harboring EGFR mutations.比较第一代表皮生长因子受体酪氨酸激酶抑制剂治疗携带 EGFR 突变的晚期非小细胞肺癌脑转移患者的疗效。
BMC Cancer. 2018 Oct 22;18(1):1012. doi: 10.1186/s12885-018-4911-7.
5
Overall survival of super-elderly (85 years or older) advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients with active epidermal growth factor receptor mutations receiving first-line gefitinib therapy: a single-institute retrospective study.一线吉非替尼治疗有活性表皮生长因子受体突变的超老年(85 岁或以上)晚期非小细胞肺癌患者的总生存期:一项单中心回顾性研究。
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2021 Jan;147(1):287-293. doi: 10.1007/s00432-020-03344-1. Epub 2020 Aug 6.
6
The salvage therapy in lung adenocarcinoma initially harbored susceptible EGFR mutation and acquired resistance occurred to the first-line gefitinib and second-line cytotoxic chemotherapy.肺腺癌初始携带有敏感 EGFR 突变,一线吉非替尼和二线细胞毒化疗获得性耐药。
BMC Pharmacol Toxicol. 2017 May 10;18(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s40360-017-0130-0.
7
First-line treatment of advanced epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation positive non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer.晚期表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)突变阳性非鳞状非小细胞肺癌的一线治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 May 25(5):CD010383. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010383.pub2.
8
Liver metastasis predicts poorer prognosis in stage IV lung adenocarcinoma patients receiving first-line gefitinib.肝转移预示着接受一线吉非替尼治疗的IV期肺腺癌患者预后较差。
Lung Cancer. 2015 May;88(2):187-94. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2015.02.012. Epub 2015 Feb 23.
9
The association between clinical prognostic factors and epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) efficacy in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer patients: a retrospective assessment of 94 cases with EGFR mutations.晚期非小细胞肺癌患者临床预后因素与表皮生长因子受体酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(EGFR-TKI)疗效的相关性:94例EGFR突变患者的回顾性评估
Oncotarget. 2017 Jan 10;8(2):3412-3421. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.13787.
10
Adverse Prognostic CT Findings for Patients With Advanced Lung Adenocarcinoma Receiving First-Line Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Therapy.一线表皮生长因子受体酪氨酸激酶抑制剂治疗的晚期肺腺癌患者的不良预后 CT 表现。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2018 Jan;210(1):43-51. doi: 10.2214/AJR.17.18167. Epub 2017 Nov 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Multi-classifier-based identification of COVID-19 from chest computed tomography using generalizable and interpretable radiomics features.基于多分类器的 COVID-19 胸部 CT 影像识别:利用可推广且可解释的放射组学特征。
Eur J Radiol. 2021 Mar;136:109552. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2021.109552. Epub 2021 Jan 15.
2
COVID-19 pneumonia: Diagnostic and prognostic role of CT based on a retrospective analysis of 214 consecutive patients from Paris, France.COVID-19 肺炎:基于法国巴黎 214 例连续患者的回顾性分析的 CT 诊断和预后作用。
Eur J Radiol. 2020 Oct;131:109209. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2020.109209. Epub 2020 Aug 8.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Radiomics of high-grade serous ovarian cancer: association between quantitative CT features, residual tumour and disease progression within 12 months.高级别浆液性卵巢癌的放射组学:定量 CT 特征与 12 个月内残余肿瘤和疾病进展之间的关系。
Eur Radiol. 2018 Nov;28(11):4849-4859. doi: 10.1007/s00330-018-5389-z. Epub 2018 May 8.
2
Primary central nervous system lymphoma and atypical glioblastoma: Differentiation using radiomics approach.原发性中枢神经系统淋巴瘤和非典型性脑胶质瘤:基于放射组学方法的鉴别诊断。
Eur Radiol. 2018 Sep;28(9):3832-3839. doi: 10.1007/s00330-018-5368-4. Epub 2018 Apr 6.
3
Rapid Contour-based Segmentation for F-FDG PET Imaging of Lung Tumors by Using ITK-SNAP: Comparison to Expert-based Segmentation.
Deep learning: definition and perspectives for thoracic imaging.
深度学习:胸部影像学的定义和展望。
Eur Radiol. 2020 Apr;30(4):2021-2030. doi: 10.1007/s00330-019-06564-3. Epub 2019 Dec 6.
基于快速轮廓的肺肿瘤 F-FDG PET 成像分割:与专家分割的比较
Radiology. 2018 Jul;288(1):277-284. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2018171756. Epub 2018 Apr 3.
4
A New Approach to Predict Progression-free Survival in Stage IV EGFR-mutant NSCLC Patients with EGFR-TKI Therapy.一种新方法预测 EGFR-TKI 治疗中 IV 期 EGFR 突变型 NSCLC 患者的无进展生存期。
Clin Cancer Res. 2018 Aug 1;24(15):3583-3592. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-17-2507. Epub 2018 Mar 21.
5
Assessing the prognostic value of carcinoembryonic antigen levels in stage I and II colon cancer.评估癌胚抗原水平在 I 期和 II 期结肠癌中的预后价值。
Eur J Cancer. 2018 May;94:1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2018.01.112. Epub 2018 Mar 20.
6
Optimising preoperative risk stratification tools for prostate cancer using mpMRI.利用 mpMRI 优化前列腺癌的术前风险分层工具。
Eur Radiol. 2018 Mar;28(3):1016-1026. doi: 10.1007/s00330-017-5031-5. Epub 2017 Oct 6.
7
Nomogram for individualised prediction of liver failure risk after hepatectomy in patients with resectable hepatocellular carcinoma: the evidence from ultrasound data.基于超声数据的可切除肝细胞癌患者肝切除术后肝功能衰竭风险个体化预测列线图
Eur Radiol. 2018 Feb;28(2):877-885. doi: 10.1007/s00330-017-4900-2. Epub 2017 Aug 4.
8
Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Radiogenomics Map Identifies Relationships between Molecular and Imaging Phenotypes with Prognostic Implications.非小细胞肺癌放射基因组图谱确定分子与影像表型之间的关系及其预后意义。
Radiology. 2018 Jan;286(1):307-315. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2017161845. Epub 2017 Jul 20.
9
Somatic Mutations Drive Distinct Imaging Phenotypes in Lung Cancer.体细胞突变驱动肺癌中不同的影像学表型。
Cancer Res. 2017 Jul 15;77(14):3922-3930. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-17-0122. Epub 2017 May 31.
10
Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer, Version 5.2017, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology.非小细胞肺癌临床实践指南(2017 年第 5 版),NCCN 肿瘤学临床实践指南
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2017 Apr;15(4):504-535. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2017.0050.