a Laboratory of Respiratory Pathophysiology (LAFIR), Maria Aparecida Pedrossian Universitary Hospital (HUMAP), Campo Grande, MS 79040-630, Brazil.
b Anhanguera Faculty, Avenida Cavalhada 4890, Porto Alegre, RS 91740-001, Brazil.
Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2019 Aug;44(8):879-885. doi: 10.1139/apnm-2018-0662. Epub 2019 Jan 16.
Step tests are a stressful and feasible cost-effective modality to evaluate aerobic performance. However, the eccentric in addition to concentric muscle contractions of the legs on stepping emerge as a potential speeding factor for cardioventilatory and metabolic adjustments towards a steady-state, since eccentric contractions would prompt an earlier and stronger mechanoreceptor activation, as well as higher heart rate/cardiac output adjustments to the same metabolic demand. Moreover, shorter tests are ideal for exercise-limited subjects. Nine subjects with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease were invited to participate in comprehensive lung function tests and constant work tests performed on different days at a 90% gas exchange threshold for 6 min, in single-step tests or cycle ergometry. After careful monoexponential regression modelling, statistically relevant faster phase II time constants for oxygen uptake (45 ± 18 s vs 53 ± 17 s, = 0.017) and minute ventilation (61 ± 13 s vs 74 ± 17 s, = 0.027) were observed in the 6-min step tests compared with cycle ergometry, respectively. Despite an absence of heart rate time constant difference (43 ± 20 s vs 69 ± 46 s, = 0.167), there was a significantly faster rate constant toward a steady state for heart rate ( = 0.02). In addition, 4-min compared with 6-min analysis presented similar results ( > 0.05), providing an appropriate steady-state. We conclude that step tests might elicit faster time constants compared with cycle ergometry, at the same average metabolic level, and 4-min analysis has similar mean errors compared with 6-min analysis within an acceptable range. New studies, comprising mechanisms and detailed physiological backgrounds, are necessary.
台阶试验是一种有压力且经济有效的评估有氧能力的方法。然而,与腿部的向心收缩相比,腿部的离心和向心收缩在踏台阶时会成为影响心肺和代谢调整至稳定状态的潜在加速因素,因为离心收缩会更早、更强地激活机械感受器,并使心率/心输出量更快地适应相同的代谢需求。此外,较短的测试对于运动受限的患者更为理想。邀请了 9 名慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者参加综合肺功能测试和恒功测试,在不同的日子里,以 90%的换气阈进行 6 分钟的测试,分别采用单步测试和踏车测试。经过仔细的单指数回归模型分析,在 6 分钟的台阶测试中,与踏车测试相比,氧摄取(45 ± 18 s 比 53 ± 17 s, = 0.017)和分钟通气量(61 ± 13 s 比 74 ± 17 s, = 0.027)的第二时相时间常数更快,分别观察到统计学上显著更快。尽管心率时间常数差异(43 ± 20 s 比 69 ± 46 s, = 0.167)不存在,但心率达到稳定状态的速率常数更快( = 0.02)。此外,4 分钟与 6 分钟的分析结果相似( > 0.05),提供了适当的稳定状态。我们得出结论,在相同的平均代谢水平下,台阶测试可能比踏车测试更快地产生时间常数,而 4 分钟的分析与 6 分钟的分析相比,在可接受的范围内具有相似的平均误差。需要进行新的研究,包括机制和详细的生理学背景。