• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者在相似通气下进行手臂和腿部运动时出现类似的动态过度充气。

Similar dynamic hyperinflation during arm and leg exercise at similar ventilation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

机构信息

Department of Pulmonary Diseases, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2011 Jun;43(6):996-1001. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e318205e2be.

DOI:10.1249/MSS.0b013e318205e2be
PMID:21085035
Abstract

PURPOSE

Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) report more dyspnea during arm than during leg exercise. One of the major causes of dyspnea is dynamic hyperinflation (DH), which is caused by airflow limitation as well as increase in ventilation. The aims of our study were to compare DH at equal ventilation (isoventilation) during arm and legwork and to investigate the effects of breathing pattern on DH.

METHODS

Thirteen clinically stable patients with mild to very severe COPD (forced expiratory volume in 1 s = 59% ± 21%) participated in this study. Arm and leg constant work rate (CWR) ergometry were performed in random order with ventilation equal to that at 50% of peak armload. The corresponding leg load of that level of ventilation was determined from the incremental leg test. Respiratory physiology was measured breath-by-breath. Change in inspiratory capacity, measured at rest and at 2-min intervals, was used to reflect DH.

RESULTS

At steady-state isoventilation (37 ± 2 and 36 ± 2 L · min for arm and leg CWR tests, respectively, P > 0.05), armload was 29 ± 5 W and leg load was 52 ± 6 W (P < 0.001). The level of DH, 0.32 ± 0.09 and 0.27 ± 0.08 L during arm and leg exercises, respectively, was not significantly different. However, breathing frequency was greater during arm than during leg exercise (24 ± 1 vs 21 ± 1 breaths per minute, P < 0.01), and the opposite was true for tidal volume (1.56 ± 0.15 vs 1.69 ± 0.14 L, P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

At similar ventilation, we found a similar degree of DH during arm and leg CWR tests in patients with mild to very severe COPD. Although differences in breathing pattern were observed between arm and leg exercises, these did not affect the level of DH.

摘要

目的

患有慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)的患者在进行手臂运动时比进行腿部运动时报告更多的呼吸困难。呼吸困难的主要原因之一是动态过度充气(DH),这是由气流受限以及通气增加引起的。我们研究的目的是比较手臂和腿部工作时相同通气量(等通气)下的 DH,并研究呼吸模式对 DH 的影响。

方法

13 名临床稳定的轻度至重度 COPD 患者(第 1 秒用力呼气量=59%±21%)参与了这项研究。手臂和腿部等速恒功率(CWR)运动以随机顺序进行,通气量等于 50%的峰值手臂负荷。相应的腿部通气量水平的腿部负荷是从递增腿部测试中确定的。呼吸生理学通过呼吸测量。通过测量休息时和 2 分钟间隔时吸气容量的变化来反映 DH。

结果

在稳定的等通气状态下(手臂和腿部 CWR 测试分别为 37±2 和 36±2 L·min,P>0.05),手臂负荷为 29±5 W,腿部负荷为 52±6 W(P<0.001)。手臂和腿部运动时的 DH 水平分别为 0.32±0.09 和 0.27±0.08 L,无显著差异。然而,手臂运动时呼吸频率高于腿部运动(24±1 比 21±1 次/分钟,P<0.01),而潮气量则相反(1.56±0.15 比 1.69±0.14 L,P<0.01)。

结论

在相同的通气量下,我们发现轻度至重度 COPD 患者在手臂和腿部 CWR 测试中出现了相似程度的 DH。尽管手臂和腿部运动之间观察到呼吸模式的差异,但这些差异并未影响 DH 水平。

相似文献

1
Similar dynamic hyperinflation during arm and leg exercise at similar ventilation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者在相似通气下进行手臂和腿部运动时出现类似的动态过度充气。
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2011 Jun;43(6):996-1001. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e318205e2be.
2
[Effect of dynamic hyperinflation on exertional dyspnea, exercise performance and quality of life in COPD].[动态肺过度充气对慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者运动性呼吸困难、运动能力及生活质量的影响]
Tuberk Toraks. 2008;56(3):296-303.
3
Physiological responses to high intensity, constant-load arm exercise in COPD.慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者对高强度、恒定负荷手臂运动的生理反应
Respir Med. 2008 Mar;102(3):348-53. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2007.10.020. Epub 2007 Dec 11.
4
[The effect of controlled and uncontrolled dynamic lower extremity training in the rehabilitation of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease].[控制性与非控制性动态下肢训练对慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者康复的影响]
Orv Hetil. 2005 Oct 30;146(44):2249-55.
5
Modulation of operational lung volumes with the use of salbutamol in COPD patients accomplishing upper limbs exercise tests.在慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者完成上肢运动试验时使用沙丁胺醇对有效肺容积的调节作用。
Respir Med. 2009 Feb;103(2):251-7. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2008.08.018. Epub 2008 Oct 19.
6
Peak physiologic responses to arm and leg ergometry in male and female patients with airflow obstruction.气流阻塞的男性和女性患者对上肢和下肢测力计的最大生理反应。
Chest. 2003 Aug;124(2):511-8.
7
Exercise performance and dynamic hyperinflation in lymphangioleiomyomatosis.淋巴管平滑肌瘤病患者的运动表现和动态过度充气。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2012 Aug 15;186(4):341-8. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201203-0372OC. Epub 2012 Jun 14.
8
Sex differences in exertional dyspnea in patients with mild COPD: physiological mechanisms.慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者运动性呼吸困难的性别差异:生理机制。
Respir Physiol Neurobiol. 2011 Aug 15;177(3):218-27. doi: 10.1016/j.resp.2011.04.011. Epub 2011 Apr 16.
9
Lactic acid levels in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease accomplishing unsupported arm exercises.慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者进行无支撑手臂运动时的乳酸水平。
Chron Respir Dis. 2010;7(2):75-82. doi: 10.1177/1479972310361833. Epub 2010 Mar 26.
10
[Evaluation of dynamic hyperinflation parameters and exercise capacity at maximal exercise in patients with COPD].[慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者最大运动时动态肺过度充气参数及运动能力的评估]
Tuberk Toraks. 2005;53(4):340-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Mechanical-ventilatory responses to peak and ventilation-matched upper- versus lower-body exercise in normal subjects.正常受试者对上、下身运动时峰通气与通气匹配的机械通气反应。
Exp Physiol. 2019 Jun;104(6):920-931. doi: 10.1113/EP087648. Epub 2019 Apr 15.
2
Ventilatory demand and dynamic hyperinflation induced during ADL-based tests in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease patients.在慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的基于日常活动的测试中引起的通气需求和动态过度充气。
Braz J Phys Ther. 2016 Jun 16;20(5):441-450. doi: 10.1590/bjpt-rbf.2014.0170.
3
Dynamic hyperinflation correlates with exertional oxygen desaturation in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
动态过度充气与慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的运动性氧饱和度下降相关。
Lung. 2013 Apr;191(2):177-82. doi: 10.1007/s00408-012-9443-3. Epub 2013 Jan 3.