• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肺癌患者多样化群体中临终关怀利用情况及住院时间的健康差异

Health Disparities in Hospice Utilization and Length of Stay in a Diverse Population With Lung Cancer.

作者信息

Johnson Lee Ann, Blew Amy, Schreier Ann M

机构信息

1 Department of Nursing Science, College of Nursing, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, USA.

2 University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, UNC HealthCare, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.

出版信息

Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2019 Jun;36(6):513-518. doi: 10.1177/1049909118823721. Epub 2019 Jan 16.

DOI:10.1177/1049909118823721
PMID:30650989
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer deaths globally. Individuals are diagnosed at an advanced stage with limited life expectancy.

OBJECTIVES

To explore potential health disparities in hospice utilization and length of stay (LOS) in a diverse sample of patients with lung cancer.

METHODS

Demographic and clinical information as well as data for hospice utilization and LOS was extracted from electronic health records. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, χ tests, and an analysis of variance test.

RESULTS

Data from 242 patients were analyzed. In the sample, 33% (n = 80) were Black and 51% (n = 124) lived in a rural county. At the time of data collection, 67% of the sample was deceased and 36% (n = 86) chose to enroll in hospice. No disparities were found for race, age, gender, or rural/urban dwellers in hospice enrollment. No disparities were found for race, gender, or rural/urban dwellers for hospice LOS. Age was associated with hospice LOS ( P = .004). Those who were older were more likely to have a longer LOS.

CONCLUSION

Hospice utilization and LOS were low for all groups with lung cancer in a geographically and racially diverse region of the United States. Given the rates of mortality in lung cancer, discussions about the goals and benefits of hospice care may be beneficial and should be part of an ongoing dialogue throughout the disease trajectory.

摘要

背景

肺癌是全球癌症死亡的主要原因。患者确诊时已处于晚期,预期寿命有限。

目的

在不同的肺癌患者样本中,探讨临终关怀利用情况和住院时间(LOS)方面潜在的健康差异。

方法

从电子健康记录中提取人口统计学和临床信息以及临终关怀利用情况和住院时间的数据。使用描述性统计、χ检验和方差分析进行数据分析。

结果

对242例患者的数据进行了分析。在样本中,33%(n = 80)为黑人,51%(n = 124)居住在农村县。在数据收集时,67%的样本已死亡,36%(n = 86)选择加入临终关怀。在临终关怀登记方面,未发现种族、年龄、性别或农村/城市居民之间存在差异。在临终关怀住院时间方面,未发现种族、性别或农村/城市居民之间存在差异。年龄与临终关怀住院时间相关(P = 0.004)。年龄较大者住院时间更有可能更长。

结论

在美国一个地理和种族多样化的地区,所有肺癌患者群体的临终关怀利用情况和住院时间都较低。鉴于肺癌的死亡率,关于临终关怀的目标和益处的讨论可能是有益处的,并且应该成为整个疾病过程中持续对话的一部分。

相似文献

1
Health Disparities in Hospice Utilization and Length of Stay in a Diverse Population With Lung Cancer.肺癌患者多样化群体中临终关怀利用情况及住院时间的健康差异
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2019 Jun;36(6):513-518. doi: 10.1177/1049909118823721. Epub 2019 Jan 16.
2
Racial disparities in length of stay in hospice care by tumor stage in a large elderly cohort with non-small cell lung cancer.在一个大型老年非小细胞肺癌队列中,根据肿瘤分期,种族差异对临终关怀住院时间的影响。
Palliat Med. 2012 Jan;26(1):61-71. doi: 10.1177/0269216311407693. Epub 2011 May 23.
3
Barriers to Hospice Care in Trauma Patients: The Disparities in End-of-Life Care.创伤患者临终关怀的障碍:临终关怀中的差异
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2018 Aug;35(8):1081-1084. doi: 10.1177/1049909117753377. Epub 2018 Jan 23.
4
Disparities in end of life care for elderly lung cancer patients.老年肺癌患者临终关怀的差异。
J Community Health. 2014 Oct;39(5):1012-9. doi: 10.1007/s10900-014-9850-x.
5
Hospice utilization in patients with malignant gliomas.恶性脑胶质瘤患者的临终关怀利用。
Neuro Oncol. 2018 Mar 27;20(4):538-545. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/nox196.
6
Disparities in hospice care among older women dying with ovarian cancer.老年女性卵巢癌患者临终关怀的差异。
Gynecol Oncol. 2012 Apr;125(1):14-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2011.11.041. Epub 2011 Dec 1.
7
Sociodemographic Characteristics and Lengths of Stay Associated With Acute Palliative Care: A 10-Year National Perspective.
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2018 Dec;35(12):1512-1517. doi: 10.1177/1049909118786409. Epub 2018 Jul 9.
8
Underuse of hospice care by Medicaid-insured patients with stage IV lung cancer in New York and California.纽约和加利福尼亚州四期肺癌的医疗补助保险患者对临终关怀的使用不足。
J Clin Oncol. 2013 Jul 10;31(20):2569-79. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2012.45.9271. Epub 2013 Jun 3.
9
Race as a Predictor of Palliative Care Referral Time, Hospice Utilization, and Hospital Length of Stay: A Retrospective Noncomparative Analysis.种族作为姑息治疗转诊时间、临终关怀利用情况和住院时间的预测因素:一项回顾性非对比分析。
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2018 Jan;35(1):110-116. doi: 10.1177/1049909116686733. Epub 2017 Jan 5.
10
Decreasing variation in the use of hospice among older adults with breast, colorectal, lung, and prostate cancer.减少乳腺癌、结直肠癌、肺癌和前列腺癌老年患者临终关怀使用情况的差异。
Med Care. 2004 Feb;42(2):116-22. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000108765.86294.1b.

引用本文的文献

1
Naming racism as a root cause of inequities in palliative care research: a scoping review.将种族主义命名为姑息治疗研究中不平等现象的根本原因:范围综述。
BMC Palliat Care. 2024 Jun 10;23(1):143. doi: 10.1186/s12904-024-01465-9.
2
Disparities in Lung Cancer: A Targeted Literature Review Examining Lung Cancer Screening, Diagnosis, Treatment, and Survival Outcomes in the United States.肺癌的差异:一项针对美国肺癌筛查、诊断、治疗和生存结果的目标文献综述。
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2024 Jun;11(3):1489-1500. doi: 10.1007/s40615-023-01625-2. Epub 2023 May 19.
3
Family caregiving experiences with hospice lung cancer patients compared to other cancer types.
与其他癌症类型相比,临终关怀肺癌患者的家庭护理体验。
J Psychosoc Oncol. 2023;41(2):210-225. doi: 10.1080/07347332.2022.2101907. Epub 2022 Aug 5.
4
Factors influencing place of death and disenrollment among patients receiving specialist palliative care.影响接受专科姑息治疗患者死亡和退出医保地点的因素。
Acta Biomed. 2022 May 12;93(S2):e2022189. doi: 10.23750/abm.v93iS2.12637.
5
Incidence and associated factors of sudden unexpected death in advanced cancer patients: A multicenter prospective cohort study.晚期癌症患者中突然意外死亡的发生率及相关因素:一项多中心前瞻性队列研究。
Cancer Med. 2021 Jul;10(14):4939-4947. doi: 10.1002/cam4.4030. Epub 2021 Jun 10.