Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, The Netherlands.
Department of Pediatrics, Pediatric Endocrinology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, The Netherlands.
J Sci Med Sport. 2019 Jul;22(7):790-796. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2018.12.016. Epub 2019 Jan 4.
Standing desks and stability balls are increasingly popular to increase muscle activity and thereby prevent potential adverse cardiometabolic effects of prolonged sitting. The present study examined the effects of (1) sitting on a stability ball ('active sitting') and (2) hourly 10-min standing interruptions during prolonged sitting on postprandial cardiometabolic biomarkers.
Experimental crossover study.
Twenty healthy-weight males (19.2±0.6years) participated randomly in three 5-h conditions: (1) sitting on an office chair (SIT), (2) sitting on a stability ball (SIT-ACTIVE) and (3) sitting with hourly 10-min standing interruptions (SIT-STAND). In each condition, participants consumed a standardized mixed meal at baseline. Hourly blood samples and pre/post saliva samples were collected and analyzed for levels of insulin, glucose and cortisol. Pre/post hemodynamic monitoring (middle finger; Nexfin-monitoring) was conducted; heart rate was measured continuously (Polar) and muscle activity (leg and lower-back, Portilab) was measured during periods of sitting (on an office chair and on a stability ball) and standing.
Muscle activity and heart rate during standing periods were significantly higher than during sitting (both SIT and SIT-ACTIVE). Generalized estimating equations revealed no significant difference in any of the biomarkers between the three experimental conditions. Systolic blood pressure was lower during SIT-STAND, while stroke volume was lower during SIT-ACTIVE than during SIT. Although significant, these differences were small, approximating the day-to-day variability in blood pressure and stroke volume.
We conclude that hourly standing interruptions during 5h prolonged sitting or continuously sitting on a stability ball do not significantly affect postprandial cardiometabolic biomarkers in healthy young men.
This trial is registered in the NTR trial register (NTRcode 5723).
站立式办公桌和健身球越来越受欢迎,因为它们可以增加肌肉活动,从而预防长时间坐着可能对新陈代谢和心血管系统产生的不良影响。本研究旨在检验(1)坐在健身球上(“主动坐”)和(2)长时间坐着时每小时进行 10 分钟站立休息,这两种方式对餐后心血管代谢生物标志物的影响。
交叉实验研究。
20 名健康体重的男性(19.2±0.6 岁)随机参与了三种 5 小时的实验条件:(1)坐在办公椅上(SIT),(2)坐在健身球上(SIT-ACTIVE),(3)每隔一小时休息 10 分钟站立(SIT-STAND)。在每种条件下,参与者在基线时都摄入了一份标准化的混合餐。每小时采集一次血液样本和唾液样本,并分析胰岛素、血糖和皮质醇水平。进行了预/后血流动力学监测(中指尖;Nexfin 监测);心率连续(Polar)测量,在坐(坐在办公椅和健身球上)和站时测量腿部和下背部的肌肉活动(Portilab)。
站立期间的肌肉活动和心率明显高于坐姿(包括 SIT 和 SIT-ACTIVE)。广义估计方程显示,三种实验条件下,任何生物标志物均无显著差异。SIT-STAND 时收缩压较低,而 SIT-ACTIVE 时每搏量低于 SIT。虽然差异显著,但这些差异很小,接近血压和每搏量的日常变化。
我们的结论是,在 5 小时长时间坐着期间,每小时进行站立休息或连续坐在健身球上,不会显著影响健康年轻男性的餐后心血管代谢生物标志物。
本试验在 NTR 试验注册中心(NTRcode 5723)注册。