Division of Chronic Disease and Injury Prevention, Los Angeles County Department of Public Health, Los Angeles, California.
Spark Policy Institute, 2717 Welton St, Denver, CO 80205. Email:
Prev Chronic Dis. 2019 Jan 17;16:E06. doi: 10.5888/pcd16.180278.
To describe the potential reach of restaurant-based strategies that seek to improve the healthfulness of menu options, it is important to understand the local restaurant environment, including the extent to which restaurants subject to policy mandates are located in communities disproportionately affected by diet-related diseases.
This cross-sectional study examined the restaurant environment in Los Angeles County, a large jurisdiction with diverse geographic and socioeconomic characteristics, specifically 1) the number and characteristics of restaurants; 2) the association between neighborhood sociodemographics and restaurant density; and 3) the association between neighborhood sociodemographics and restaurant characteristics, including chain status (large chain, small chain, independent restaurant). Data sources were 1) industry data on restaurant location and characteristics (N = 24,292 restaurants) and 2) US Census data on neighborhood sociodemographics (N = 247 neighborhoods). We conducted descriptive and bivariate analyses at the restaurant and neighborhood level.
Countywide, only 26.5% of all restaurants were part of a large chain (a chain with ≥20 locations). We found positive associations between restaurant density and neighborhood proportions of non-Hispanic white residents and residents with more than a high school education. We found limited support to suggest a greater density of large chains in neighborhoods with lower socioeconomic status.
Results highlight the potentially limited reach of strategies targeting chain restaurants and point to the importance of including small chain restaurants and independent restaurants in public health efforts to improve the healthfulness of restaurants. Understanding where restaurants are in relation to priority populations is a critical step to planning strategies that address diet-related disparities.
为了描述旨在改善菜单选项健康度的餐厅策略的潜在覆盖范围,了解当地的餐厅环境非常重要,包括受到政策要求约束的餐厅在多大程度上位于受饮食相关疾病影响较大的社区。
本横断面研究考察了洛杉矶县的餐厅环境,该县地域和社会经济特征多样,具体包括:1)餐厅数量和特征;2)社区社会人口统计学特征与餐厅密度之间的关系;3)社区社会人口统计学特征与餐厅特征之间的关系,包括连锁状态(大型连锁、小型连锁、独立餐厅)。数据来源为:1)餐厅位置和特征的行业数据(N=24292 家餐厅);2)社区社会人口统计学特征的美国人口普查数据(N=247 个街区)。我们在餐厅和社区层面进行了描述性和双变量分析。
全县范围内,只有 26.5%的餐厅属于大型连锁餐厅(拥有≥20 家分店的连锁餐厅)。我们发现餐厅密度与非西班牙裔白人居民比例和受过高中以上教育居民比例较高的社区之间存在正相关关系。我们发现,支持在社会经济地位较低的社区中存在更多大型连锁餐厅密度的证据有限。
研究结果强调了针对连锁餐厅的策略潜在覆盖范围有限,并指出在改善餐厅健康度的公共卫生工作中,包括小型连锁餐厅和独立餐厅的重要性。了解餐厅与重点人群的关系是规划解决饮食相关差异策略的关键步骤。