• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

人类遗传谱系推断与法医家族搜索中的假阳性。

Human-Genetic Ancestry Inference and False Positives in Forensic Familial Searching.

机构信息

Department of Biology, Stanford University, CA 94305.

Department of Biology, Stanford University, CA 94305

出版信息

G3 (Bethesda). 2020 Aug 5;10(8):2893-2902. doi: 10.1534/g3.120.401473.

DOI:10.1534/g3.120.401473
PMID:32586848
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7407470/
Abstract

In forensic familial search methods, a query DNA profile is tested against a database to determine if the query profile represents a close relative of a database entrant. One challenge for familial search is that the calculations may require specification of allele frequencies for the unknown population from which the query profile has originated. The choice of allele frequencies affects the rate at which non-relatives are erroneously classified as relatives, and allele-frequency misspecification can substantially inflate false positive rates compared to use of allele frequencies drawn from the same population as the query profile. Here, we use ancestry inference on the query profile to circumvent the high false positive rates that result from highly misspecified allele frequencies. In particular, we perform ancestry inference on the query profile and make use of allele frequencies based on its inferred genetic ancestry. In a test for sibling matches on profiles that represent unrelated individuals, we demonstrate that false positive rates for familial search with use of ancestry inference to specify the allele frequencies are similar to those seen when allele frequencies align with the population of origin of a profile. Because ancestry inference is possible to perform on query profiles, the extreme allele-frequency misspecifications that produce the highest false positive rates can be avoided. We discuss the implications of the results in the context of concerns about the forensic use of familial searching.

摘要

在法医亲缘关系搜索方法中,查询 DNA 图谱与数据库进行测试,以确定查询图谱是否代表数据库录入者的近亲。亲缘关系搜索的一个挑战是,计算可能需要指定查询图谱来源的未知人群的等位基因频率。等位基因频率的选择会影响将非亲属错误分类为亲属的速度,与使用与查询图谱来自同一人群的等位基因频率相比,等位基因频率的错误指定会大大增加假阳性率。在这里,我们使用查询图谱的祖先推断来避免由于高度错误指定的等位基因频率而导致的高假阳性率。具体来说,我们对查询图谱进行祖先推断,并利用基于其推断的遗传祖先的等位基因频率。在针对代表无关个体的图谱进行兄弟姐妹匹配测试中,我们证明使用基于祖先推断来指定等位基因频率的亲缘关系搜索的假阳性率与与图谱来源人群的等位基因频率一致时看到的假阳性率相似。由于可以对查询图谱进行祖先推断,因此可以避免产生最高假阳性率的极端等位基因频率错误指定。我们在讨论结果时考虑了对法医使用亲缘关系搜索的担忧。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d973/7407470/4f87a6af7393/2893f6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d973/7407470/cc3c86bee360/2893f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d973/7407470/341bd1dc2684/2893f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d973/7407470/e3168fccc224/2893f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d973/7407470/0f18a0802a37/2893f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d973/7407470/66826342cca9/2893f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d973/7407470/4f87a6af7393/2893f6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d973/7407470/cc3c86bee360/2893f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d973/7407470/341bd1dc2684/2893f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d973/7407470/e3168fccc224/2893f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d973/7407470/0f18a0802a37/2893f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d973/7407470/66826342cca9/2893f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d973/7407470/4f87a6af7393/2893f6.jpg

相似文献

1
Human-Genetic Ancestry Inference and False Positives in Forensic Familial Searching.人类遗传谱系推断与法医家族搜索中的假阳性。
G3 (Bethesda). 2020 Aug 5;10(8):2893-2902. doi: 10.1534/g3.120.401473.
2
Familial identification: population structure and relationship distinguishability.家族鉴定:群体结构与个体关系辨识度。
PLoS Genet. 2012 Feb;8(2):e1002469. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002469. Epub 2012 Feb 9.
3
Use of sibling pairs to determine the familial searching efficiency of forensic databases.利用同胞对来确定法医数据库的家族搜索效率。
Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2008 Sep;2(4):340-2. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2008.04.008. Epub 2008 Jun 12.
4
Statistical Detection of Relatives Typed with Disjoint Forensic and Biomedical Loci.基于不相关法医和生物医学位点的亲属关联的统计检测。
Cell. 2018 Oct 18;175(3):848-858.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2018.09.008. Epub 2018 Oct 11.
5
FrogAncestryCalc: A standalone batch likelihood computation tool for ancestry inference panels catalogued in FROG-kb.蛙祖计算器:一个独立的批处理似然计算工具,用于推断 Frog-kb 中编目的祖先推断面板。
Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2020 May;46:102237. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2020.102237. Epub 2020 Jan 22.
6
A proof-of-principle study: The potential application of MiniHap biomarkers in ancestry inference based on the QNome nanopore sequencing.一项原理验证研究:基于QNome纳米孔测序的MiniHap生物标志物在血统推断中的潜在应用。
Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2024 Jan;68:102947. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2023.102947. Epub 2023 Oct 17.
7
Familial searching: a specialist forensic DNA profiling service utilising the National DNA Database to identify unknown offenders via their relatives--the UK experience.家系搜索:一种利用国家 DNA 数据库通过亲属识别未知犯罪者的法医 DNA 分析专业服务——英国的经验。
Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2014 Jan;8(1):1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2013.07.004. Epub 2013 Sep 7.
8
Massively parallel sequencing of 165 ancestry-informative SNPs and forensic biogeographical ancestry inference in three southern Chinese Sinitic/Tai-Kadai populations.对 165 个具有族群遗传信息的 SNP 进行大规模平行测序,并对中国南方三个汉藏语系/台语族群进行法医学生物地理族群推断。
Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2021 May;52:102475. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2021.102475. Epub 2021 Feb 2.
9
The successful use of familial searching in six Hungarian high profile cases by applying a new module in Familias 3.通过在Familias 3中应用一个新模块,家族搜索在匈牙利的六个备受瞩目的案件中成功应用。
Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2016 Sep;24:24-32. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2016.05.012. Epub 2016 May 19.
10
Kinship index variations among populations and thresholds for familial searching.群体间的亲缘指数变化和家系搜索的阈值。
PLoS One. 2012;7(5):e37474. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0037474. Epub 2012 May 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Decreased accuracy of forensic DNA mixture analysis for groups with lower genetic diversity.遗传多样性较低群体的法医DNA混合分析准确性降低。
iScience. 2024 Sep 28;27(11):111067. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2024.111067. eCollection 2024 Nov 15.
2
A Dirichlet model of alignment cost in mixed-membership unsupervised clustering.混合成员无监督聚类中对齐成本的狄利克雷模型。
J Comput Graph Stat. 2023;32(3):1145-1159. doi: 10.1080/10618600.2022.2127739. Epub 2022 Nov 14.
3
Review: Computational analysis of human skeletal remains in ancient DNA and forensic genetics.

本文引用的文献

1
Pedigrees and Perpetrators: Uses of DNA and Genealogy in Forensic Investigations.谱系与犯罪者:DNA和族谱学在法医调查中的应用
Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet. 2020 Aug 31;21:535-564. doi: 10.1146/annurev-genom-111819-084213. Epub 2020 Apr 14.
2
The effect of FBI CODIS Core STR Loci expansion on familial DNA database searching.FBI CODIS 核心 STR 基因座扩展对家族 DNA 数据库搜索的影响。
Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2019 Nov;43:102129. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2019.07.008. Epub 2019 Jul 27.
3
Familial DNA searching- an emerging forensic investigative tool.
综述:古代DNA和法医遗传学中人类骨骼遗骸的计算分析
iScience. 2023 Oct 4;26(11):108066. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2023.108066. eCollection 2023 Nov 17.
4
Recent advances in forensic biology and forensic DNA typing: INTERPOL review 2019-2022.法医生物学和法医DNA分型的最新进展:国际刑警组织2019 - 2022年综述
Forensic Sci Int Synerg. 2022 Dec 27;6:100311. doi: 10.1016/j.fsisyn.2022.100311. eCollection 2023.
5
Joint DNA-based disaster victim identification.基于 DNA 的联合灾难遇难者身份鉴定。
Sci Rep. 2021 Jul 1;11(1):13661. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-93071-5.
6
Interpretation of DNA data within the context of UK forensic science - investigation.在英国法医学背景下对 DNA 数据的解读——调查。
Emerg Top Life Sci. 2021 Sep 24;5(3):395-404. doi: 10.1042/ETLS20210165.
家族DNA搜索——一种新兴的法医调查工具。
Sci Justice. 2019 Jan;59(1):20-28. doi: 10.1016/j.scijus.2018.07.006. Epub 2018 Aug 1.
4
Linkage disequilibrium matches forensic genetic records to disjoint genomic marker sets.连锁不平衡将法医遗传记录与不相交的基因组标记集匹配。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 May 30;114(22):5671-5676. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1619944114. Epub 2017 May 15.
5
Individual Identifiability Predicts Population Identifiability in Forensic Microsatellite Markers.个体可识别性预测法医微卫星标记中的群体可识别性。
Curr Biol. 2016 Apr 4;26(7):935-42. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2016.01.065. Epub 2016 Mar 17.
6
Forensic genetic analysis of bio-geographical ancestry.生物地理血统的法医遗传学分析。
Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2015 Sep;18:49-65. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2015.05.012. Epub 2015 May 19.
7
Selection and implementation of expanded CODIS core loci in the United States.美国扩展联合DNA索引系统(CODIS)核心基因座的选择与实施
Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2015 Jul;17:33-34. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2015.03.006. Epub 2015 Mar 12.
8
The influence of relatives on the efficiency and error rate of familial searching.亲属对家系搜索效率和错误率的影响。
PLoS One. 2013 Aug 14;8(8):e70495. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0070495. eCollection 2013.
9
Forensic familial searching: scientific and social implications.法医学中的家系调查:科学和社会影响。
Nat Rev Genet. 2013 Jul;14(7):445. doi: 10.1038/nrg3519.
10
Familial identification: population structure and relationship distinguishability.家族鉴定:群体结构与个体关系辨识度。
PLoS Genet. 2012 Feb;8(2):e1002469. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002469. Epub 2012 Feb 9.