Suppr超能文献

局部复发性恶性胶质瘤的多模态治疗:再次手术和/或再放疗后进行化疗。

Multimodal treatment for local recurrent malignant gliomas: Resurgery and/or reirradiation followed by chemotherapy.

作者信息

Prelaj Arsela, Rebuzzi Sara Elena, Grassi Massimiliano, Giròn Berrìos Julio Rodrigo, Pecorari Silvia, Fusto Carmela, Ferrara Carla, Salvati Maurizio, Stati Valeria, Tomao Silverio, Bianco Vincenzo

机构信息

Department of Medical Oncology Unit A, Policlinico Umberto I, 'Sapienza' University of Rome, I-00161 Rome, Italy.

Department of Medical Oncology, Ospedale Policlinico San Martino IST, I-16132 Genoa, Italy.

出版信息

Mol Clin Oncol. 2019 Jan;10(1):49-57. doi: 10.3892/mco.2018.1745. Epub 2018 Oct 16.

Abstract

The therapeutic management of recurrent malignant gliomas (MGs) is not determined. Therefore, the efficacy of a multimodal approach and a combination systemic therapy was investigated. A retrospective analysis of 26 MGs patients at first relapse treated with multimodal therapy (chemotherapy plus surgery and/or reirradiation) or chemotherapy alone was performed. Second-line chemotherapy consisted of fotemustine (FTM) in combination with bevacizumab (BEV) (cFTM/BEV) or followed by third-line BEV (sFTM/BEV). Subgroup analyses were performed. Multimodal therapy provided a higher overall response rate (ORR) (73 vs. 47%), disease control rate (DCR) (82 vs. 67%), median progression-free survival (mPFS) (11 vs. 7 months; P=0.08) and median overall survival (mOS) (13 vs. 8 months; P=0.04) compared with chemotherapy. Concomitant FTM/BEV resulted in higher ORR (84 vs. 36%), DCR (92 vs. 57%), mPFS (10 vs. 5 months; P=0.22) and mOS (11 vs. 5.2 months; P=0.15) compared with sFTM/BEV. Methylated patients did not experience additional survival benefits with multimodality treatment but had higher mPFS (10 vs 7.1 months; P=0.33) and mOS (11 vs. 8 months; P=0.33) with cFTM/BEV. Unmethylated patients experienced the greatest survival benefit with the multimodal approach (mPFS: 10 vs. 5 months; mOS 11 vs 6 months; both P=0.02) and cFTM/BEV (mPFS: 5 vs. 2 months; mOS 6 vs. 3.2 months; both P=0.01). In conclusion, in recurrent MGs, multimodal therapy and cFTM/BEV provide survival and response benefits. Methylated patients benefit from a cFTM/BEV but not from a multimodal approach. Notably, unmethylated patients had the highest survival benefit with the two strategies.

摘要

复发性恶性胶质瘤(MGs)的治疗方案尚未确定。因此,研究了多模式方法和联合全身治疗的疗效。对26例首次复发的MGs患者进行了回顾性分析,这些患者接受了多模式治疗(化疗加手术和/或再放疗)或单纯化疗。二线化疗包括福莫司汀(FTM)联合贝伐单抗(BEV)(cFTM/BEV)或后续的三线BEV(sFTM/BEV)。进行了亚组分析。与化疗相比,多模式治疗提供了更高的总缓解率(ORR)(73%对47%)、疾病控制率(DCR)(82%对67%)、中位无进展生存期(mPFS)(11个月对7个月;P=0.08)和中位总生存期(mOS)(13个月对8个月;P=0.04)。与sFTM/BEV相比,同时使用FTM/BEV导致更高的ORR(84%对36%)、DCR(92%对57%)、mPFS(10个月对5个月;P=0.22)和mOS(11个月对5.2个月;P=0.15)。甲基化患者在多模式治疗中未获得额外的生存益处,但在cFTM/BEV治疗中有更高的mPFS(10个月对7.1个月;P=0.33)和mOS(11个月对8个月;P=0.33)。未甲基化患者通过多模式方法(mPFS:10个月对5个月;mOS 11个月对6个月;P均=0.02)和cFTM/BEV(mPFS:5个月对2个月;mOS 6个月对3.2个月;P均=0.01)获得了最大的生存益处。总之,在复发性MGs中,多模式治疗和cFTM/BEV提供了生存和缓解益处。甲基化患者从cFTM/BEV中获益,但未从多模式方法中获益。值得注意的是,未甲基化患者通过这两种策略获得了最高的生存益处。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d03a/6313879/e7a9c681ef3c/mco-10-01-0049-g00.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验