• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

梳状预后评分系统在接受再放疗的印度复发性胶质瘤患者中的验证。

Validation of Combs prognostic scoring system in Indian recurrent glioma patients treated with re-radiation.

作者信息

Dutta Debnarayan, Jose Meenu, Kalavagunta Sruthi, Sasidharan Ajay, Nair Haridas, Edappattu Annex H

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences, Kochi, Kerala, India.

Department of Medical Physics, Amrita Institute of Medical Science, Kochi, Kerala, India.

出版信息

Radiat Oncol J. 2024 Mar;42(1):32-42. doi: 10.3857/roj.2023.00542. Epub 2024 Jan 23.

DOI:10.3857/roj.2023.00542
PMID:38549382
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10982055/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Retrospective audit of recurrent glioma patients treated by different fractionation schedules and to validate the modified Combs prognostic score in Indian patient cohort.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between Jan 2009 and June 2022, 66 recurrent gliomas patients treated with standard adjuvant treatment-radiation (RT) ± temozolomide (chemotherapy)-and re-treated with RT (±chemotherapy) were categorized as per modified Combs prognostic criteria and outcomes were compared.

RESULTS

Sixty-six patients with recurrent gliomas who received reirradiation (re-RT) were audited-53% males; 61% Karnofsky performance status (KPS) ≥80 at time of re-RT; median age 41.5 years (range, 6 to 70 years); 67% <50 years; primary histology low-grade glioma in 33% ; grade III 27%, grade IV 40%; initial median dose of 60 Gy equivalent dose in 2 Gy fractions EQD2; maximum safe resection at recurrence 41%; mean and median follow-up 78 ± 51 months and 66 months. Mean time interval between RT was 46.4 ± 39 months. Mean planning target volume (PTV) volume in conventional RT (Conv-RT), hypofractionated RT (Hypo-RT), and ultra-hypofractionated RT (UF-RT) was 226.1 ± 140.7 mL, 162.8 ± 123.3 mL, and 143.3 ± 145.8 mL. Mean dose for Conv-RT, Hypo-RT, and UF-RT was 50 Gy (range, 40 to 60), 31 Gy (range, 20 to 40), and 20 Gy (range, 10 to 30). Mean overall survival (OS) in Conv-RT, Hypo-RT, and UF-RT cohort was 18.8 months (range, 2.4 to 76.8); 6.6 months (range, 2 to 17.4), and 13.9 months (range, 3 to 131.9). Median OS as per Combs criteria were 16.6 months (Group a), 24.6 months (Group b), 4.6 months (Group c), and 3 months (Group d). Significant survival benefit was with good KPS score (KPS >80 vs. <80; 20.46 vs. 5.25 months; p < 0.001), patients receiving salvage chemotherapy (20.46 vs. 6.96 months; p = 0.001), and patients received re-RT biological equivalent dose BED3 >80 Gy (16.62 vs. 5.48 months; p = 0.03). Median OS in our patient cohort and Combs cohort in Group a was 16.6 and 19.5 months; Group b was 24.6 and 11.3 months; Group c was 4.7 and 8.1 months, and Group d was 2 and 5.5 months, respectively. Six months survival in our patient cohort and Combs cohort in Groups a, b, c, d were 100%, 92%, 34%, 17% and 94%, 79%, 70%, 41%, respectively. Twelve months survival in our patient cohort and Combs cohort in Groups a, b, c, d were 88%, 74%, 22%, 0% and 88%, 47%, 22%, 7%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Modified Combs prognostic factors predicts OS and is applicable in Indian subcontinent patient population.

摘要

目的

对采用不同分割方案治疗的复发性胶质瘤患者进行回顾性审计,并在印度患者队列中验证改良的Combs预后评分。

材料与方法

2009年1月至2022年6月期间,66例接受标准辅助治疗(放疗±替莫唑胺化疗)且复发后再次接受放疗(±化疗)的复发性胶质瘤患者,根据改良的Combs预后标准进行分类,并比较其预后。

结果

对66例接受再程放疗(re-RT)的复发性胶质瘤患者进行了审计,其中男性占53%;再程放疗时61%的患者卡氏功能状态(KPS)≥80;中位年龄41.5岁(范围6至70岁);67%的患者年龄<50岁;33%的患者原发性组织学类型为低级别胶质瘤,27%为III级,40%为IV级;初始中位剂量为60 Gy等效剂量(2 Gy分割);复发时最大安全切除率为41%;平均和中位随访时间分别为78±51个月和66个月。放疗之间的平均时间间隔为46.4±39个月。常规放疗(Conv-RT)、大分割放疗(Hypo-RT)和超分割放疗(UF-RT)中的平均计划靶体积(PTV)分别为226.1±140.7 mL、162.8±123.3 mL和143.3±145.8 mL。Conv-RT、Hypo-RT和UF-RT的平均剂量分别为50 Gy(范围40至60)、31 Gy(范围20至40)和20 Gy(范围10至30)。Conv-RT、Hypo-RT和UF-RT队列中的平均总生存期(OS)分别为18.8个月(范围2.4至76.8)、6.6个月(范围2至17.4)和13.9个月(范围3至131.9)。根据Combs标准,中位总生存期在a组为16.6个月,b组为24.6个月,c组为4.6个月,d组为3个月。良好的KPS评分(KPS>80 vs.<80;20.46 vs.5.25个月;p<0.001)、接受挽救性化疗的患者(20.46 vs.6.96个月;p = 0.001)以及接受再程放疗生物等效剂量BED3>80 Gy的患者(16.62 vs.5.48个月;p = 0.03)具有显著的生存获益。我们患者队列和Combs队列中a组的中位总生存期分别为16.6个月和19.5个月;b组分别为24.6个月和11.3个月;c组分别为4.7个月和8.1个月;d组分别为2个月和5.5个月。我们患者队列和Combs队列中a、b、c、d组的6个月生存率分别为100%、92%、34%、17%和94%、79%、70%、41%。我们患者队列和Combs队列中a、b、c、d组的12个月生存率分别为88%、74%、22%、0%和88%、47%、22%、7%。

结论

改良的Combs预后因素可预测总生存期,适用于印度次大陆的患者群体。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d9b/10982055/30d9f3c6c35b/roj-2023-00542f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d9b/10982055/bc8c89f136b8/roj-2023-00542f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d9b/10982055/d679802ae6b2/roj-2023-00542f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d9b/10982055/30d9f3c6c35b/roj-2023-00542f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d9b/10982055/bc8c89f136b8/roj-2023-00542f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d9b/10982055/d679802ae6b2/roj-2023-00542f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d9b/10982055/30d9f3c6c35b/roj-2023-00542f3.jpg

相似文献

1
Validation of Combs prognostic scoring system in Indian recurrent glioma patients treated with re-radiation.梳状预后评分系统在接受再放疗的印度复发性胶质瘤患者中的验证。
Radiat Oncol J. 2024 Mar;42(1):32-42. doi: 10.3857/roj.2023.00542. Epub 2024 Jan 23.
2
Validation of an established prognostic score after re-irradiation of recurrent glioma.复发性胶质瘤再照射后一种既定预后评分的验证
Acta Oncol. 2017 Mar;56(3):422-426. doi: 10.1080/0284186X.2016.1276621. Epub 2017 Jan 11.
3
Re-irradiation of recurrent gliomas: pooled analysis and validation of an established prognostic score-report of the Radiation Oncology Group (ROG) of the German Cancer Consortium (DKTK).复发性脑胶质瘤再放疗:德国癌症研究联合会(DKTK)放射肿瘤学组(ROG)的一项既定预后评分的汇总分析和验证报告。
Cancer Med. 2018 May;7(5):1742-1749. doi: 10.1002/cam4.1425. Epub 2018 Mar 23.
4
High-dose salvage re-irradiation for recurrent/progressive adult diffuse glioma: healing or hurting?大剂量挽救性再放疗治疗复发性/进展性成人弥漫性神经胶质瘤:有益还是有害?
Clin Transl Oncol. 2021 Jul;23(7):1358-1367. doi: 10.1007/s12094-020-02526-0. Epub 2021 Feb 2.
5
Modification and optimization of an established prognostic score after re-irradiation of recurrent glioma.复发性胶质瘤再照射后既定预后评分的修改与优化。
PLoS One. 2017 Jul 5;12(7):e0180457. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0180457. eCollection 2017.
6
Re-irradiation for malignant glioma: Toward patient selection and defining treatment parameters for salvage.恶性胶质瘤的再照射:迈向挽救性治疗的患者选择及治疗参数界定
Adv Radiat Oncol. 2018 Jul 10;3(4):582-590. doi: 10.1016/j.adro.2018.06.005. eCollection 2018 Oct-Dec.
7
Survival following reirradiation using intensity-modulated radiation therapy with temozolomide in selected patients with recurrent high grade gliomas.在选定的复发性高级别胶质瘤患者中,使用调强放疗联合替莫唑胺进行再放疗后的生存情况。
Ann Transl Med. 2015 Nov;3(20):304. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2305-5839.2015.11.29.
8
Phase I study of hypofractionated intensity modulated radiation therapy with concurrent and adjuvant temozolomide in patients with glioblastoma multiforme.多形性胶质母细胞瘤患者接受分割强度调制放射治疗联合同步和辅助替莫唑胺的 I 期研究。
Radiat Oncol. 2013 Feb 20;8:38. doi: 10.1186/1748-717X-8-38.
9
Re-Irradiation for Recurrent Gliomas: Treatment Outcomes and Prognostic Factors.复发性胶质瘤的再照射:治疗结果与预后因素
Yonsei Med J. 2016 Jul;57(4):824-30. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2016.57.4.824.
10
Re-irradiation for recurrent high-grade glioma: an analysis of prognostic factors for survival and predictors of radiation necrosis.复发性高级别胶质瘤的再放疗:生存预后因素分析及放射性坏死预测因素。
J Neurooncol. 2023 Jul;163(3):541-551. doi: 10.1007/s11060-023-04340-4. Epub 2023 May 31.

本文引用的文献

1
Glioma patient-reported outcomes: patients and clinicians.胶质瘤患者报告的结局:患者与临床医生
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2023 Oct;13(e1):e205-e212. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2020-002699. Epub 2021 Mar 2.
2
Extent of re-excision, sequence/timing of salvage re-irradiation, and disease-free interval impact upon clinical outcomes in recurrent/progressive ependymoma.复发性/进展性室管膜瘤中再次切除范围、挽救性再放疗的顺序/时间以及无疾病间期对临床结果的影响。
J Neurooncol. 2020 Apr;147(2):405-415. doi: 10.1007/s11060-020-03434-7. Epub 2020 Feb 18.
3
Progress and Prospects of Recurrent Glioma: A Recent Scientometric Analysis of the Web of Science in 2019.
复发性神经胶质瘤的研究进展与展望:2019 年 Web of Science 的科学计量分析
World Neurosurg. 2020 Feb;134:e387-e399. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.10.078. Epub 2019 Oct 19.
4
Hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy combined with chemotherapy or not in the management of recurrent malignant gliomas: A systematic review and meta-analysis.低分割立体定向放射治疗联合或不联合化疗治疗复发性恶性胶质瘤的系统评价和荟萃分析
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2019 Aug;183:105401. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2019.105401. Epub 2019 Jun 25.
5
Proton therapy for brain tumours in the area of evidence-based medicine.质子治疗脑瘤的循证医学。
Br J Radiol. 2020 Mar;93(1107):20190237. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20190237. Epub 2019 May 20.
6
Multimodal treatment for local recurrent malignant gliomas: Resurgery and/or reirradiation followed by chemotherapy.局部复发性恶性胶质瘤的多模态治疗:再次手术和/或再放疗后进行化疗。
Mol Clin Oncol. 2019 Jan;10(1):49-57. doi: 10.3892/mco.2018.1745. Epub 2018 Oct 16.
7
Re-irradiation for recurrent glioma: outcome evaluation, toxicity and prognostic factors assessment. A multicenter study of the Radiation Oncology Italian Association (AIRO).复发性脑胶质瘤的再放疗:结果评估、毒性和预后因素评估。意大利放射肿瘤学协会(AIRO)的一项多中心研究。
J Neurooncol. 2019 Mar;142(1):59-67. doi: 10.1007/s11060-018-03059-x. Epub 2018 Dec 4.
8
Re-irradiation for malignant glioma: Toward patient selection and defining treatment parameters for salvage.恶性胶质瘤的再照射:迈向挽救性治疗的患者选择及治疗参数界定
Adv Radiat Oncol. 2018 Jul 10;3(4):582-590. doi: 10.1016/j.adro.2018.06.005. eCollection 2018 Oct-Dec.
9
Re-irradiation of recurrent gliomas: pooled analysis and validation of an established prognostic score-report of the Radiation Oncology Group (ROG) of the German Cancer Consortium (DKTK).复发性脑胶质瘤再放疗:德国癌症研究联合会(DKTK)放射肿瘤学组(ROG)的一项既定预后评分的汇总分析和验证报告。
Cancer Med. 2018 May;7(5):1742-1749. doi: 10.1002/cam4.1425. Epub 2018 Mar 23.
10
Reirradiation for recurrent primary central nervous system tumors: Eight-year audit from a tertiary cancer care center in South India.复发性原发性中枢神经系统肿瘤的再照射:来自印度南部一家三级癌症护理中心的八年审计。
Indian J Cancer. 2017 Apr-Jun;54(2):409-414. doi: 10.4103/ijc.IJC_216_17.