• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

威尔士低血糖药物处方费用与代谢控制的关系:基于初级保健数据的全国分析。

Prescribing costs of hypoglycaemic agents and associations with metabolic control in Wales; a national analysis of primary care data.

机构信息

Diabetes Research Group, Cardiff University School of Medicine, Cardiff, UK.

All Wales Therapeutics and Toxicology Centre, The Routledge Academic Centre, University Hospital Llandough, Cardiff, UK.

出版信息

Diabet Med. 2022 Sep;39(9):e14908. doi: 10.1111/dme.14908. Epub 2022 Jul 19.

DOI:10.1111/dme.14908
PMID:35766972
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9545615/
Abstract

AIMS

There has been a dramatic increase in hypoglycaemic agent expenditure. We assessed the variability in prescribing costs at the practice level and the relationship between expenditure and the proportion of patients achieving target glycaemic control.

METHODS

We utilized national prescribing data from 406 general practices in Wales. This was compared against glycaemic control (percentage of patients achieving a HbA1c level < 59 mmol/mol in the preceding 12 months). Analyses were adjusted for the number of patients with diabetes in each general practice and the Welsh Index of Multiple Deprivation.

RESULTS

There was considerable heterogeneity in hypoglycaemic agent spend per patient with diabetes, Median = £289 (IQR 247-343) range £31.1-£1713. Higher total expenditure was not associated with improved glycaemic control B  = -0.01 (95%CI -0.01, 0.002) p = 0.13. High-spend practices spent more on SGLT2 inhibitors (16 vs. 9% p < 0.001) and GLP-1 agonists (13 vs. 11% p < 0.001) and less on insulin (34 vs. 42% p < 0.001), biguanides (9 vs. 11% p = 0.001) and sulphonylureas (2 vs. 3% p < 0.001) than low spend practices. There were no differences in the pattern of drug prescribing between high spend practices with better glycaemic control (mean 68% of patients HbA1c <59 mmol/mol) and those with less good metabolic control (mean 58% of patients HbA1c <59 mmol/mol).

CONCLUSIONS

Spend on hypoglycaemic agents is highly variable between practices and increased expenditure per patient is not associated with better glycaemic control. Whilst newer, more expensive agents have additional benefits, in individuals where these advantages are more marginal widespread use of these agents has important cost implications.

摘要

目的

降糖药物的支出大幅增加。我们评估了实践层面上的处方费用变化,并评估了支出与实现目标血糖控制的患者比例之间的关系。

方法

我们利用威尔士 406 家普通诊所的全国处方数据。将这些数据与血糖控制(过去 12 个月内 HbA1c 水平<59mmol/mol 的患者比例)进行比较。分析调整了每个普通诊所的糖尿病患者人数和威尔士多重剥夺指数。

结果

糖尿病患者的降糖药物人均支出存在很大差异,中位数为 289 英镑(IQR 247-343),范围为 31.1-1713 英镑。总支出较高与血糖控制的改善无关 B = -0.01(95%CI -0.01, 0.002)p = 0.13。高支出实践在 SGLT2 抑制剂(16%比 9%,p<0.001)和 GLP-1 激动剂(13%比 11%,p<0.001)上的花费更多,而在胰岛素(34%比 42%,p<0.001)、二甲双胍(9%比 11%,p=0.001)和磺脲类药物(2%比 3%,p<0.001)上的花费更少。在血糖控制较好(平均 68%的患者 HbA1c<59mmol/mol)和控制较差(平均 58%的患者 HbA1c<59mmol/mol)的高支出实践中,药物处方模式没有差异。

结论

实践之间的降糖药物支出差异很大,每位患者的支出增加与血糖控制改善无关。虽然新型、更昂贵的药物有额外的好处,但在这些优势更为边缘的个体中,这些药物的广泛使用会带来重要的成本影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f6a4/9545615/5edb7f1f58fd/DME-39-0-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f6a4/9545615/619f6bf3b06d/DME-39-0-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f6a4/9545615/01e54f1f691f/DME-39-0-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f6a4/9545615/a3f6628fb14c/DME-39-0-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f6a4/9545615/4ecb224b9d61/DME-39-0-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f6a4/9545615/5edb7f1f58fd/DME-39-0-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f6a4/9545615/619f6bf3b06d/DME-39-0-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f6a4/9545615/01e54f1f691f/DME-39-0-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f6a4/9545615/a3f6628fb14c/DME-39-0-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f6a4/9545615/4ecb224b9d61/DME-39-0-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f6a4/9545615/5edb7f1f58fd/DME-39-0-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Prescribing costs of hypoglycaemic agents and associations with metabolic control in Wales; a national analysis of primary care data.威尔士低血糖药物处方费用与代谢控制的关系:基于初级保健数据的全国分析。
Diabet Med. 2022 Sep;39(9):e14908. doi: 10.1111/dme.14908. Epub 2022 Jul 19.
2
Sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors, the latest residents on the block: Impact on glycaemic control at a general practice level in England.钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白2抑制剂,该领域的最新成员:对英格兰全科医疗水平血糖控制的影响
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2018 Jul;20(7):1659-1669. doi: 10.1111/dom.13281. Epub 2018 Apr 17.
3
Improving type 2 diabetes mellitus glycaemic outcomes is possible without spending more on medication: Lessons from the UK National Diabetes Audit.改善 2 型糖尿病患者的血糖控制结果无需在药物治疗上花费更多:来自英国国家糖尿病审计的经验教训。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2018 Jan;20(1):185-194. doi: 10.1111/dom.13067. Epub 2017 Sep 8.
4
Efficacy and safety of liraglutide for overweight adult patients with type 1 diabetes and insufficient glycaemic control (Lira-1): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.利拉鲁肽治疗血糖控制不佳的超重 1 型糖尿病成年患者的疗效和安全性(Lira-1):一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验。
Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2016 Mar;4(3):221-232. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(15)00436-2. Epub 2015 Dec 3.
5
Newer agents for blood glucose control in type 2 diabetes: systematic review and economic evaluation.新型 2 型糖尿病血糖控制药物:系统评价和经济评估。
Health Technol Assess. 2010 Jul;14(36):1-248. doi: 10.3310/hta14360.
6
Route to improving Type 1 diabetes mellitus glycaemic outcomes: real-world evidence taken from the National Diabetes Audit.改善 1 型糖尿病患者血糖控制效果的途径:来自国家糖尿病审计的真实世界证据。
Diabet Med. 2018 Jan;35(1):63-71. doi: 10.1111/dme.13541.
7
Repaglinide : a pharmacoeconomic review of its use in type 2 diabetes mellitus.瑞格列奈:对其在2型糖尿病治疗中应用的药物经济学综述
Pharmacoeconomics. 2004;22(6):389-411. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200422060-00005.
8
Disparities in glycaemic control, monitoring, and treatment of type 2 diabetes in England: A retrospective cohort analysis.英格兰 2 型糖尿病患者血糖控制、监测和治疗的差异:一项回顾性队列分析。
PLoS Med. 2019 Oct 7;16(10):e1002942. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002942. eCollection 2019 Oct.
9
Long-term sustainability of glycaemic achievements with second-line antidiabetic therapies in patients with type 2 diabetes: A real-world study.2型糖尿病患者二线抗糖尿病治疗血糖控制效果的长期可持续性:一项真实世界研究。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2018 Jul;20(7):1722-1731. doi: 10.1111/dom.13288. Epub 2018 Apr 15.
10
Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion versus multiple daily injections in children and young people at diagnosis of type 1 diabetes: the SCIPI RCT.1 型糖尿病诊断时采用连续皮下胰岛素输注与多次皮下注射胰岛素治疗儿童和青少年:SCIPI RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2018 Aug;22(42):1-112. doi: 10.3310/hta22420.

本文引用的文献

1
First-line treatment for type 2 diabetes: is it too early to abandon metformin?2型糖尿病的一线治疗:现在放弃二甲双胍是否为时过早?
Lancet. 2020 Nov 28;396(10264):1705-1707. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32523-X.
2
2019 Update to: Management of Hyperglycemia in Type 2 Diabetes, 2018. A Consensus Report by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD).2019 年更新版:《2018 年美国糖尿病协会(ADA)与欧洲糖尿病研究协会(EASD)关于 2 型糖尿病患者高血糖管理的共识报告》。
Diabetes Care. 2020 Feb;43(2):487-493. doi: 10.2337/dci19-0066. Epub 2019 Dec 19.
3
The costs of drug prescriptions for diabetes in the NHS.
英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)中糖尿病药物处方的费用。
Lancet. 2019 Jan 19;393(10168):226-227. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)33190-8.
4
Estimated Versus Observed Expenditure Associated with Medicines Recommended by the All Wales Medicines Strategy Group.与全威尔士药品战略小组推荐药品相关的预计支出与实际支出对比
Pharmacoecon Open. 2019 Sep;3(3):343-350. doi: 10.1007/s41669-019-0116-5.
5
Management of Hyperglycemia in Type 2 Diabetes, 2018. A Consensus Report by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD).2018 年美国糖尿病协会(ADA)和欧洲糖尿病研究协会(EASD)共识报告:2 型糖尿病患者高血糖管理。
Diabetes Care. 2018 Dec;41(12):2669-2701. doi: 10.2337/dci18-0033. Epub 2018 Oct 4.
6
Time trends and geographical variation in prescribing of drugs for diabetes in England from 1998 to 2017.1998 年至 2017 年英格兰糖尿病药物处方的时间趋势和地域差异。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2018 Sep;20(9):2159-2168. doi: 10.1111/dom.13346. Epub 2018 Jun 5.
7
Global aetiology and epidemiology of type 2 diabetes mellitus and its complications.2 型糖尿病及其并发症的全球病因学和流行病学。
Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2018 Feb;14(2):88-98. doi: 10.1038/nrendo.2017.151. Epub 2017 Dec 8.
8
The role of the Quality and Outcomes Framework in the care of long-term conditions: a systematic review.质量和结果框架在长期疾病护理中的作用:系统评价。
Br J Gen Pract. 2017 Nov;67(664):e775-e784. doi: 10.3399/bjgp17X693077. Epub 2017 Sep 25.
9
Pharmacogenetics in type 2 diabetes: influence on response to oral hypoglycemic agents.2型糖尿病的药物遗传学:对口服降糖药反应的影响
Pharmgenomics Pers Med. 2016 Apr 6;9:17-29. doi: 10.2147/PGPM.S84854. eCollection 2016.
10
Trends in incidence, prevalence and prescribing in type 2 diabetes mellitus between 2000 and 2013 in primary care: a retrospective cohort study.2000年至2013年基层医疗中2型糖尿病的发病率、患病率及处方趋势:一项回顾性队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2016 Jan 13;6(1):e010210. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010210.