Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, United States of America.
Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, United States of America.
Int J Psychophysiol. 2021 May;163:11-21. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2019.01.004. Epub 2019 Jan 17.
The stop-signal task (SST) is used to study action-stopping in the laboratory. In SSTs, the P3 event-related potential following stop-signals is considered to be a neural index of motor inhibition. However, a similar P3 deflection is often observed following infrequent events in non-inhibition tasks. Moreover, within SSTs, stop-signals are indeed infrequent events, presenting a systematic confound that hampers the interpretation of the stop-signal P3 (and other candidate neural indices of motor inhibition). Therefore, we performed two studies to test whether the stop-signal P3 is uniquely related to motor inhibition or reflects infrequency detection. In Study 1, participants completed the SST and a visually identical change-detection task requiring the detection of a task-relevant, frequent signal (but not motor inhibition). We observed a P3 associated with motor inhibition in the SST, but no such positivity in the change-detection task. In Study 2, we modified the change-detection task. Some task-relevant events were now infrequent, matching the frequency of stop-signals in the SST. These events indeed evoked a P3, though of smaller amplitude than the P3 in the SST. Independent component analysis suggested that stop-signal P3 and infrequency-P3 ERPs were non-independent and shared a common neural generator. Further analyses suggested that this common neural process likely reflects motor inhibition in both tasks: infrequent events in the change-detection task lead to a non-instructed, incidental slowing of motor responding, the degree of which was strongly correlated with P3 amplitude. These results have wide-reaching implications for the interpretation of neural signals in both stop-signal and infrequency/oddball-tasks.
停止信号任务(SST)用于在实验室中研究动作停止。在 SST 中,停止信号后的 P3 事件相关电位被认为是运动抑制的神经指标。然而,在非抑制任务中,很少出现事件时也经常观察到类似的 P3 偏转。此外,在 SST 中,停止信号确实是罕见事件,这构成了系统混淆,阻碍了对停止信号 P3(和其他候选运动抑制的神经指标)的解释。因此,我们进行了两项研究,以测试停止信号 P3 是否与运动抑制特有相关,还是反映了频率检测。在研究 1 中,参与者完成了 SST 和一个视觉上完全相同的变化检测任务,该任务需要检测与任务相关的频繁信号(但不需要运动抑制)。我们在 SST 中观察到与运动抑制相关的 P3,但在变化检测任务中没有观察到这种正性。在研究 2 中,我们修改了变化检测任务。现在,一些与任务相关的事件变得罕见,与 SST 中的停止信号频率相匹配。这些事件确实引发了 P3,尽管幅度比 SST 中的 P3 小。独立成分分析表明,停止信号 P3 和罕见事件 P3 ERP 不是独立的,它们共享一个共同的神经发生器。进一步的分析表明,这个共同的神经过程可能反映了两个任务中的运动抑制:变化检测任务中的罕见事件导致非指令性、偶然的运动反应减速,其程度与 P3 幅度强烈相关。这些结果对停止信号和罕见/奇数任务中神经信号的解释具有广泛的影响。