• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

特定模态训练的适应性改变——是否会导致运动后急性炎症反应减弱?

Modality-specific training adaptations - do they lead to a dampened acute inflammatory response to exercise?

机构信息

The Peter Harrison Centre for Disability Sport, School of Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences, Loughborough University, Loughborough LE11 3TU, UK.

School of Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences, Loughborough University, Loughborough LE11 3TU, UK.

出版信息

Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2019 Sep;44(9):965-972. doi: 10.1139/apnm-2018-0693. Epub 2019 Jan 21.

DOI:10.1139/apnm-2018-0693
PMID:30664359
Abstract

While adaptations to a short-term training program can dampen the acute inflammatory response to exercise, less is known about the influence of chronic modality-specific adaptations to training. This study compares the acute inflammatory response to upper- and lower-body interval exercise in individuals chronically trained in these respective modalities. Ninety minutes of interval exercise matched for relative power output on an arm-crank (ARM) and cycle ergometer (LEG) was performed by 8 trained paddlers and 8 trained cyclists. Blood samples were taken before and after exercise. Interleukin-6 (IL-6) concentrations were analysed in plasma, while the expression of intracellular heat shock protein 72 (iHsp72) was assessed in monocytes. IL-6 was increased following both modalities (fold change - ARM: 7.23 ± 3.56, < 0.001; LEG: 9.03 ± 4.82, < 0.001), in both groups (cyclists, < 0.001; paddlers, < 0.001), but the increase was smaller in ARM compared with LEG (time × modality, < 0.001). ARM induced a smaller iHsp72 response compared with LEG (fold change - ARM: 1.07 ± 0.14, = 0.102; LEG: 1.18 ± 0.14, < 0.001; time × modality, = 0.039). Following ARM, iHsp72 expression was increased in the cyclists only (fold change cyclists: 1.12 ± 0.11, = 0.018; paddlers: 1.03 ± 0.17, = 0.647), while iHsp72 expression following LEG was increased in both groups (fold change cyclists: 1.14 ± 0.15, = 0.027; paddlers: 1.22 ± 0.13, < 0.001). Taken together, the acute inflammatory response to lower-body interval exercise was larger compared with work-matched upper-body interval exercise. Moreover, adaptations to upper-body exercise training dampened the iHsp72 response to this modality. Therefore, exercise may be less effective in reducing chronic low-grade inflammation in individuals relying on their upper body, such as wheelchair users.

摘要

虽然短期训练计划的适应可以抑制运动引起的急性炎症反应,但对于慢性特定模式适应训练的影响知之甚少。本研究比较了长期接受上肢和下肢间歇训练的个体对急性炎症反应。8 名有经验的划桨手和 8 名有经验的自行车手进行了 90 分钟的间歇运动,在手臂曲柄(ARM)和自行车测力计(LEG)上的相对功率输出相匹配。运动前后采集血样。分析血浆中白细胞介素 6(IL-6)浓度,同时评估单核细胞内热休克蛋白 72(iHsp72)的表达。两种模式(ARM:7.23 ± 3.56, < 0.001;LEG:9.03 ± 4.82, < 0.001),两组(自行车运动员, < 0.001;划桨运动员, < 0.001)IL-6 均增加,但与 LEG 相比,ARM 增加较小(时间×模式, < 0.001)。与 LEG 相比,ARM 诱导的 iHsp72 反应较小(ARM:1.07 ± 0.14, = 0.102;LEG:1.18 ± 0.14, < 0.001;时间×模式, = 0.039)。ARM 后,仅自行车运动员的 iHsp72 表达增加(自行车运动员:1.12 ± 0.11, = 0.018;划桨运动员:1.03 ± 0.17, = 0.647),而 LEG 后两组的 iHsp72 表达均增加(自行车运动员:1.14 ± 0.15, = 0.027;划桨运动员:1.22 ± 0.13, < 0.001)。综上所述,与匹配工作的上肢间歇运动相比,下肢间歇运动的急性炎症反应更大。此外,对上肢运动训练的适应会抑制对该模式的 iHsp72 反应。因此,对于依赖上肢的人(如轮椅使用者),运动可能对降低慢性低度炎症的效果较差。

相似文献

1
Modality-specific training adaptations - do they lead to a dampened acute inflammatory response to exercise?特定模态训练的适应性改变——是否会导致运动后急性炎症反应减弱?
Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2019 Sep;44(9):965-972. doi: 10.1139/apnm-2018-0693. Epub 2019 Jan 21.
2
Arm and Intensity-Matched Leg Exercise Induce Similar Inflammatory Responses.手臂和强度匹配的腿部运动引发相似的炎症反应。
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2016 Jun;48(6):1161-8. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000000874.
3
Effects of training on maximal working capacity and haemodynamic response during arm and leg-exercise in a group of paddlers.训练对一组划桨运动员手臂和腿部运动期间最大工作能力及血流动力学反应的影响。
Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1975 Apr 4;34(2):113-9. doi: 10.1007/BF00999923.
4
Acute and chronic effects of hot water immersion on inflammation and metabolism in sedentary, overweight adults.热水浸泡对久坐、超重成年人的炎症和代谢的急性和慢性影响。
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2018 Dec 1;125(6):2008-2018. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00407.2018. Epub 2018 Oct 18.
5
Adaptations to endurance training in the healthy elderly: arm cranking versus leg cycling.健康老年人耐力训练的适应性:手摇曲柄训练与腿部骑行训练对比
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2006 Aug;97(6):723-31. doi: 10.1007/s00421-006-0229-2. Epub 2006 Jun 24.
6
Different responses of apoptotic, inflammatory and heat shock protein gene expression to a single bout of high-intensity interval exercise between physically active and inactive men.不同身体活跃程度的男性单次高强度间歇运动后对细胞凋亡、炎症和热休克蛋白基因表达的不同反应。
Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2021 Jul;46(7):743-752. doi: 10.1139/apnm-2020-0783. Epub 2021 Jan 13.
7
Plasma cytokine and exertional responses in relation to exercise intensity and volume of exercising muscle mass during arm-crank ergometry.在手臂曲柄测力计测试期间,血浆细胞因子与运动强度以及运动肌肉量的运动量之间的关系及运动反应。
Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2015 Aug;40(8):782-7. doi: 10.1139/apnm-2014-0537. Epub 2015 Mar 23.
8
Entrainment of breathing in cyclists and non-cyclists during arm and leg exercise.骑自行车者和非骑自行车者在手臂和腿部运动时的呼吸调节
Respir Physiol Neurobiol. 2007 Jan 15;155(1):64-70. doi: 10.1016/j.resp.2006.02.013. Epub 2006 Apr 3.
9
Comparison of cardiovascular adaptations to long-term arm and leg exercise in wheelchair athletes versus long-distance runners.轮椅运动员与长跑运动员心血管系统对长期上肢和下肢运动适应性的比较。
Am J Cardiol. 2000 Apr 15;85(8):996-1001. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(99)00917-0.
10
Acute sympathetic vasoconstriction at rest and during dynamic exercise in cyclists and sedentary humans.骑行者和久坐不动的人在休息时以及动态运动期间的急性交感神经血管收缩。
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2007 Feb;102(2):704-12. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00984.2006. Epub 2006 Nov 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Recovery-Stress Response of Blood-Based Biomarkers.基于血液的生物标志物的恢复应激反应。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 May 27;18(11):5776. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18115776.