• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Valuing Mobile Health: An Open-Ended Contingent Valuation Survey of a National Digital Health Program.重视移动医疗:一项全国数字健康计划的开放式意愿评估调查。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 Jan 17;7(1):e3. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.9990.
2
Mobile Health Divide Between Clinicians and Patients in Cancer Care: Results From a Cross-Sectional International Survey.癌症护理中临床医生与患者之间的移动医疗鸿沟:一项跨国际横断面调查的结果。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 Sep 6;7(9):e13584. doi: 10.2196/13584.
3
Consumers' Willingness to Pay for eHealth and Its Influencing Factors: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.消费者对电子健康的支付意愿及其影响因素:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Sep 14;24(9):e25959. doi: 10.2196/25959.
4
Barriers and Facilitators to the Adoption of Mobile Health Among Health Care Professionals From the United Kingdom: Discrete Choice Experiment.英国医疗保健专业人员采用移动医疗的障碍和促进因素:离散选择实验。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Jul 6;8(7):e17704. doi: 10.2196/17704.
5
Willingness-to-Accept and Willingness-to-Pay Ratios of Prevention of Mother-to-Child Transmission Services in a Nigerian Hospital: A Cross-Sectional Contingent Valuation Study.尼日利亚一家医院预防母婴传播服务的接受意愿和支付意愿比率:一项横断面条件价值评估研究
Value Health Reg Issues. 2019 Sep;19:112-121. doi: 10.1016/j.vhri.2019.05.001. Epub 2019 Aug 9.
6
Comparison of Mobile Health Technology Use for Self-Tracking Between Older Adults and the General Adult Population in Canada: Cross-Sectional Survey.加拿大老年人与普通成年人群体使用移动健康技术进行自我追踪的比较:横断面调查。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Nov 27;8(11):e24718. doi: 10.2196/24718.
7
Mobile Health (mHealth) Technology: Assessment of Availability, Acceptability, and Use in CKD.移动医疗(mHealth)技术:在慢性肾脏病中的可用性、可接受性和使用评估。
Am J Kidney Dis. 2021 Jun;77(6):941-950.e1. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2020.10.013. Epub 2020 Dec 9.
8
Attitudes, Beliefs, and Willingness Toward the Use of mHealth Tools for Medication Adherence in the Florida mHealth Adherence Project for People Living With HIV (FL-mAPP): Pilot Questionnaire Study.对使用移动医疗工具来提高艾滋病毒感染者药物依从性的态度、信念和意愿:佛罗里达州移动医疗依从性项目(FL-mAPP)的试点问卷研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 Jul 3;7(7):e12900. doi: 10.2196/12900.
9
Eliciting willingness-to-pay to prevent hospital medication administration errors in the UK: a contingent valuation survey.在英国,通过意愿调查评估法来预防医院用药管理错误的意愿:一项条件价值评估调查。
BMJ Open. 2022 Feb 1;12(2):e053115. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053115.
10
Delivering digital health and well-being at scale: lessons learned during the implementation of the dallas program in the United Kingdom.大规模提供数字健康与福祉:英国达拉斯项目实施过程中的经验教训
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2016 Jan;23(1):48-59. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocv097. Epub 2015 Aug 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Cost-Benefit Analysis of the Enhancing Men's Awareness of Testicular diseases (E-MAT) Feasibility Trial: A Virtual Reality Experience to Increase Testicular Knowledge and Self-Examination among Male Athletes.提高男性睾丸疾病认知度(E-MAT)可行性试验的成本效益分析:一项通过虚拟现实体验提高男性运动员睾丸知识及自我检查意识的研究。
Pharmacoecon Open. 2025 Mar 19. doi: 10.1007/s41669-025-00571-5.
2
Adoption of Digital Therapeutics in Europe.数字疗法在欧洲的应用。
Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2024 Dec 27;20:939-954. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S489873. eCollection 2024.
3
Determining patients' willingness to pay for telemedicine services and associated factors amidst fear of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in Ghana.在加纳,于对2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)的恐惧背景下,确定患者对远程医疗服务的支付意愿及相关因素。
Heliyon. 2023 Aug 18;9(8):e19191. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19191. eCollection 2023 Aug.
4
Willingness to Use and Pay for Digital Health Care Services According to 4 Scenarios: Results from a National Survey.根据 4 种情景愿意使用和付费数字医疗保健服务的意愿:全国调查结果。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2023 Mar 29;11:e40834. doi: 10.2196/40834.
5
Consumers' Willingness to Pay for eHealth and Its Influencing Factors: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.消费者对电子健康的支付意愿及其影响因素:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Sep 14;24(9):e25959. doi: 10.2196/25959.
6
Adopting wearables to customize health insurance contributions: a ranking-type Delphi.采用可穿戴设备定制健康保险费用:一种排序式德尔菲法。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2022 Apr 27;22(1):112. doi: 10.1186/s12911-022-01851-4.
7
Recommendations for developing a lifecycle, multidimensional assessment framework for mobile medical apps.移动医疗应用程序生命周期、多维评估框架的制定建议。
Health Econ. 2022 Sep;31 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):73-97. doi: 10.1002/hec.4505. Epub 2022 Apr 6.
8
Are caregivers ready for digital? Caregiver preferences for health technology tools to monitor medication adherence among patients with serious mental illness.照护者是否做好了迎接数字化的准备?严重精神疾病患者的照护者对用于监测药物依从性的健康技术工具的偏好。
Digit Health. 2022 Mar 10;8:20552076221084472. doi: 10.1177/20552076221084472. eCollection 2022 Jan-Dec.
9
Willingness to pay for an mHealth anti-retroviral therapy adherence and information tool: Transitioning to sustainability, Call for life randomised study experience in Uganda.对一种 mHealth 抗逆转录病毒治疗依从性和信息工具的支付意愿:向可持续性过渡,呼吁在乌干达开展生活随机研究经验。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2022 Feb 26;22(1):52. doi: 10.1186/s12911-022-01782-0.
10
A multi-method analytical approach to predicting young adults' intention to invest in mHealth during the COVID-19 pandemic.一种预测新冠疫情期间年轻人投资移动健康意愿的多方法分析方法。
Telemat Inform. 2022 Mar;68:101765. doi: 10.1016/j.tele.2021.101765. Epub 2021 Dec 22.

本文引用的文献

1
Is Connected Health Contributing to a Healthier Population?连接健康是否有助于民众更加健康?
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Nov 10;19(11):e386. doi: 10.2196/jmir.8309.
2
A Cost-Benefit Analysis of Two Alternative Models of Maternity Care in Ireland.爱尔兰两种替代模式的母婴保健的成本效益分析。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2017 Dec;15(6):785-794. doi: 10.1007/s40258-017-0344-8.
3
An Overview of Home-Based Primary Care: Learning from the Field.居家初级保健概述:从实践中学习。
Issue Brief (Commonw Fund). 2017 Jun;15:1-20.
4
Readiness for Delivering Digital Health at Scale: Lessons From a Longitudinal Qualitative Evaluation of a National Digital Health Innovation Program in the United Kingdom.大规模提供数字健康服务的准备情况:来自英国一项全国性数字健康创新计划纵向定性评估的经验教训。
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Feb 16;19(2):e42. doi: 10.2196/jmir.6900.
5
Designing and Undertaking a Health Economics Study of Digital Health Interventions.设计与开展数字健康干预措施的卫生经济学研究。
Am J Prev Med. 2016 Nov;51(5):852-860. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2016.05.007.
6
Economic evaluation of integrated new technologies for health and social care: Suggestions for policy makers, users and evaluators.卫生与社会保健综合新技术的经济评估:给政策制定者、使用者和评估者的建议
Soc Sci Med. 2016 Nov;169:141-148. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.09.033. Epub 2016 Sep 24.
7
Understanding factors affecting patient and public engagement and recruitment to digital health interventions: a systematic review of qualitative studies.了解影响患者和公众参与及招募到数字健康干预措施的因素:一项定性研究的系统评价
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2016 Sep 15;16(1):120. doi: 10.1186/s12911-016-0359-3.
8
The role of Internet resources in clinical oncology: promises and challenges.互联网资源在临床肿瘤学中的作用:前景与挑战。
Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2016 Dec;13(12):767-776. doi: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2016.78. Epub 2016 Jun 7.
9
Delivering digital health and well-being at scale: lessons learned during the implementation of the dallas program in the United Kingdom.大规模提供数字健康与福祉:英国达拉斯项目实施过程中的经验教训
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2016 Jan;23(1):48-59. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocv097. Epub 2015 Aug 8.
10
Mobile phone use and willingness to pay for SMS for diabetes in Bangladesh.孟加拉国的手机使用情况以及为糖尿病相关短信支付费用的意愿。
J Public Health (Oxf). 2016 Mar;38(1):163-9. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdv009. Epub 2015 Feb 16.

重视移动医疗:一项全国数字健康计划的开放式意愿评估调查。

Valuing Mobile Health: An Open-Ended Contingent Valuation Survey of a National Digital Health Program.

机构信息

Health Economics and Health Technology Assessment, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.

Digital Health and Wellness Group, Department of Computer and Information Sciences, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, United Kingdom.

出版信息

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 Jan 17;7(1):e3. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.9990.

DOI:10.2196/mhealth.9990
PMID:30664488
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6354197/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Changing population demographics and technology developments have resulted in growing interest in the potential of consumer-facing digital health. In the United Kingdom, a £37 million (US $49 million) national digital health program delivering assisted living lifestyles at scale (dallas) aimed to deploy such technologies at scale. However, little is known about how consumers value such digital health opportunities.

OBJECTIVE

This study explored consumers' perspectives on the potential value of digital health technologies, particularly mobile health (mHealth), to promote well-being by examining their willingness-to-pay (WTP) for such health solutions.

METHODS

A contingent valuation study involving a UK-wide survey that asked participants to report open-ended absolute and marginal WTP or willingness-to-accept for the gain or loss of a hypothetical mHealth app, Healthy Connections.

RESULTS

A UK-representative cohort (n=1697) and a dallas-like (representative of dallas intervention communities) cohort (n=305) were surveyed. Positive absolute and marginal WTP valuations of the app were identified across both cohorts (absolute WTP: UK-representative cohort £196 or US $258 and dallas-like cohort £162 or US $214; marginal WTP: UK-representative cohort £160 or US $211 and dallas-like cohort £151 or US $199). Among both cohorts, there was a high prevalence of zeros for both the absolute WTP (UK-representative cohort: 467/1697, 27.52% and dallas-like cohort: 95/305, 31.15%) and marginal WTP (UK-representative cohort: 487/1697, 28.70% and dallas-like cohort: 99/305, 32.5%). In both cohorts, better general health, previous amount spent on health apps (UK-representative cohort 0.64, 95% CI 0.27 to 1.01; dallas-like cohort: 1.27, 95% CI 0.32 to 2.23), and age had a significant (P>.00) association with WTP (UK-representative cohort: -0.1, 95% CI -0.02 to -0.01; dallas-like cohort: -0.02, 95% CI -0.03 to -0.01), with younger participants willing to pay more for the app. In the UK-representative cohort, as expected, higher WTP was positively associated with income up to £30,000 or US $39,642 (0.21, 95% CI 0.14 to 0.4) and increased spending on existing phone and internet services (0.52, 95% CI 0.30 to 0.74). The amount spent on existing health apps was shown to be a positive indicator of WTP across cohorts, although the effect was marginal (UK-representative cohort 0.01, 95% CI 0.01 to 0.01; dallas-like cohort 0.01, 95% CI 0.01 to 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates that consumers value mHealth solutions that promote well-being, social connectivity, and health care control, but it is not universally embraced. For mHealth to achieve its potential, apps need to be tailored to user accessibility and health needs, and more understanding of what hinders frequent users of digital technologies and those with long-term conditions is required. This novel application of WTP in a digital health context demonstrates an economic argument for investing in upskilling the population to promote access and expedite uptake and utilization of such digital health and well-being apps.

摘要

背景

人口结构的变化和技术的发展使得消费者关注的数字健康的潜力越来越大。在英国,一项耗资 3700 万英镑(4900 万美元)的国家数字健康计划旨在大规模推广辅助生活方式(达拉斯计划),旨在大规模部署此类技术。然而,对于消费者如何看待这些数字健康机会的价值,人们知之甚少。

目的

本研究通过考察消费者对移动健康(mHealth)等数字健康技术促进健康的潜在价值的看法,特别是通过检查他们对这些健康解决方案的支付意愿(WTP),来探讨消费者的观点。

方法

一项涉及英国范围的调查的条件价值研究,要求参与者报告对假设的 mHealth 应用程序 Healthy Connections 的潜在和边际 WTP 或接受意愿的开放式绝对和边际 WTP。

结果

调查了一个具有英国代表性的队列(n=1697)和一个类似于达拉斯(代表达拉斯干预社区)的队列(n=305)。在两个队列中都发现了对该应用程序的积极的绝对和边际 WTP 估值(绝对 WTP:英国代表性队列 £196 或 US $258 和类似于达拉斯的队列 £162 或 US $214;边际 WTP:英国代表性队列 £160 或 US $211 和类似于达拉斯的队列 £151 或 US $199)。在两个队列中,绝对 WTP(英国代表性队列:467/1697,27.52%和类似于达拉斯的队列:95/305,31.15%)和边际 WTP(英国代表性队列:487/1697,28.70%和类似于达拉斯的队列:99/305,32.5%)的零值都很高。在两个队列中,更好的一般健康状况、以前在健康应用程序上的花费(英国代表性队列 0.64,95%CI 0.27 至 1.01;类似于达拉斯的队列:1.27,95%CI 0.32 至 2.23)和年龄与 WTP 有显著(P>.00)关联(英国代表性队列:-0.1,95%CI -0.02 至 -0.01;类似于达拉斯的队列:-0.02,95%CI -0.03 至 -0.01),年轻参与者愿意为该应用程序支付更多费用。在英国代表性队列中,如预期的那样,更高的 WTP 与收入高达 30000 英镑或 39642 美元(0.21,95%CI 0.14 至 0.4)和增加现有的电话和互联网服务支出(0.52,95%CI 0.30 至 0.74)呈正相关。研究表明,在两个队列中,现有的健康应用程序的支出是 WTP 的一个积极指标,尽管效果是边际的(英国代表性队列 0.01,95%CI 0.01 至 0.01;类似于达拉斯的队列 0.01,95%CI 0.01 至 0.02)。

结论

本研究表明,消费者重视促进健康、社交联系和医疗保健控制的 mHealth 解决方案,但并非普遍接受。为了使 mHealth 发挥其潜力,应用程序需要根据用户的可及性和健康需求进行定制,并且需要更多地了解哪些因素阻碍了数字技术的频繁使用者和长期疾病患者。在数字健康背景下,对 WTP 的这种新颖应用证明了为提高人口技能水平进行投资的经济论据,以促进此类数字健康和福祉应用的获取和加速采用和利用。