Department of Neuroscience, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
Center for Neural Science, New York University, New York, NY, USA.
Nat Neurosci. 2019 Feb;22(2):275-283. doi: 10.1038/s41593-018-0314-y. Epub 2019 Jan 24.
Sequential and persistent activity models are two prominent models of short-term memory in neural circuits. In persistent activity models, memories are represented in persistent or nearly persistent activity patterns across a population of neurons, whereas in sequential models, memories are represented dynamically by a sequential activity pattern across the population. Experimental evidence for both models has been reported previously. However, it has been unclear under what conditions these two qualitatively different types of solutions emerge in neural circuits. Here, we address this question by training recurrent neural networks on several short-term memory tasks under a wide range of circuit and task manipulations. We show that both sequential and nearly persistent solutions are part of a spectrum that emerges naturally in trained networks under different conditions. Our results help to clarify some seemingly contradictory experimental results on the existence of sequential versus persistent activity-based short-term memory mechanisms in the brain.
序列和持续活动模型是神经回路中两种主要的短期记忆模型。在持续活动模型中,记忆是通过神经元群体中持续或几乎持续的活动模式来表示的,而在序列模型中,记忆是通过群体中的序列活动模式动态表示的。以前已经报道了这两种模型的实验证据。然而,在神经回路中,这两种性质不同的解决方案在什么条件下出现还不清楚。在这里,我们通过在广泛的电路和任务操作下对几种短期记忆任务进行递归神经网络训练来解决这个问题。我们表明,在不同条件下,训练网络中会自然出现序列和几乎持续的解决方案,它们共同构成了一个连续体。我们的结果有助于澄清一些关于大脑中基于序列活动和持续活动的短期记忆机制存在的看似矛盾的实验结果。