Suppr超能文献

子女报告的父母吸烟状况一致性:RHINESSA 代际研究。

Agreement of offspring-reported parental smoking status: the RHINESSA generation study.

机构信息

Section for Environment, Occupation and Health, Department of Public Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.

National Research Center for the Working Environment, Lersø Parkallé 105, DK-2100, Copenhagen O, Denmark.

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2019 Jan 21;19(1):94. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-6414-0.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

With increasing interest in exposure effects across generations, it is crucial to assess the validity of information given on behalf of others.

AIMS

To compare adult's report of their parent's smoking status against parent's own report and examine predictors for discrepant answers.

METHODS

We studied 7185 offspring (18-51 years) and one of their parents, n = 5307 (27-67 years) participating in the Respiratory Health in Northern Europe, Spain and Australia (RHINESSA) generation study. Information about parent's smoking status during offspring's childhood and mother's smoking status during pregnancy was obtained by questionnaires from parents and their offspring. We calculated sensitivity, specificity and Cohen's Kappa [κ] for agreement using parent's own report as the gold standard. We performed logistic regression to examine if offspring's sex, age, educational level, asthma status, own smoking status or parental status, as well as the parent's sex and amount of smoking during childhood predicted disagreement.

RESULTS

The sensitivity for offspring's correct report of parent's smoking status during childhood (0-10 years) was 0.82 (95% CI 0.81-0.84), specificity was 0.95 (95% CI 0.95-0.96) and a good agreement was observed, κ = 0.79 (95% CI 0.78-0.80). Offspring's report of mothers' smoking status during pregnancy showed a lower sensitivity, 0.66 (95% CI 0.60-0.71), a slightly lower specificity, 0.92 (95% CI 0.90-0.95) and a good agreement, κ = 0.61 (95% CI 0.55-0.67). In multivariate logistic regression analysis, offspring not having children was a predictor for discrepant answers (odds ratio [OR] 2.11 [95% CI 1.21-3.69]). Low amount of parents' tobacco consumption, < 10 cigarettes/day (OR 2.72 [95% CI 1.71-4.31]) also predicted disagreement compared to ≥10 cigarettes per day, and so did offspring's reports of fathers' smoking status (OR 1.73 [95% CI 1.09-2.74]) compared to mothers' smoking status. Offspring's sex, asthma status, educational level, smoking status or age was not related to discrepant answers.

CONCLUSIONS

Adults report their parent's smoking status during their childhood, as well as their mother' smoking status when pregnant with them, quite accurately. In the absence of parents' direct report, offspring's reports could be valuable.

摘要

背景

随着跨代暴露效应的兴趣日益增加,评估代表他人提供的信息的有效性至关重要。

目的

比较成年人对其父母吸烟状况的报告与父母自己的报告,并探讨不一致答案的预测因素。

方法

我们研究了 7185 名后代(18-51 岁)及其父母中的一名(5307 名,27-67 岁),他们参加了北欧、西班牙和澳大利亚呼吸健康(RHINESSA)世代研究。通过父母和子女的问卷,获取了子女童年时期父母吸烟状况以及母亲怀孕期间吸烟状况的信息。我们使用父母自己的报告作为金标准,计算了敏感性、特异性和 Cohen Kappa [κ]的一致性。我们进行了逻辑回归分析,以检验子女的性别、年龄、教育水平、哮喘状况、自身吸烟状况或父母状况,以及父母的性别和儿童时期吸烟量是否预测不一致。

结果

子女正确报告父母在童年(0-10 岁)吸烟状况的敏感性为 0.82(95%CI 0.81-0.84),特异性为 0.95(95%CI 0.95-0.96),观察到良好的一致性,κ=0.79(95%CI 0.78-0.80)。子女对母亲怀孕期间吸烟状况的报告敏感性较低,为 0.66(95%CI 0.60-0.71),特异性略低,为 0.92(95%CI 0.90-0.95),一致性良好,κ=0.61(95%CI 0.55-0.67)。在多变量逻辑回归分析中,没有子女的子女是不一致答案的预测因素(比值比 [OR] 2.11 [95%CI 1.21-3.69])。与每天吸烟≥10 支相比,父母吸烟量较低,<10 支/天(OR 2.72 [95%CI 1.71-4.31])也预测不一致,与母亲吸烟状况相比,子女报告的父亲吸烟状况(OR 1.73 [95%CI 1.09-2.74])也是如此。子女的性别、哮喘状况、教育水平、吸烟状况或年龄与不一致答案无关。

结论

成年人相当准确地报告他们在童年时期父母的吸烟状况,以及他们母亲在怀孕期间的吸烟状况。在没有父母直接报告的情况下,子女的报告可能很有价值。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e837/6341700/963755de8917/12889_2019_6414_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验