• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中国雾霾容忍度的影响因素。

The Influencing Factors of Haze Tolerance in China.

机构信息

School of Public Policy and Management, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Jan 21;16(2):287. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16020287.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph16020287
PMID:30669599
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6352209/
Abstract

Haze pollution has become the most serious environmental risk in China and generated a large amount of public concerns. Influencing almost all the citizens in the polluted area, it is necessary and important to take public perception as an essential element in haze abatement. From the perspective of social psychology, this paper explores haze tolerance in Beijing, Shanghai, and Guangzhou, also the key influential factors on haze tolerance from four dimensions: political trust, perceived risk, cost perception, and haze knowledge. Based on the sample of 517 respondents, the results show that compared with Shanghai and Guangzhou, Beijing residents had the lowest tolerance level of haze pollution but have the highest levels of trust in the government's capacity to control haze and self-evaluation of their own haze knowledge. People in Shanghai had the lowest cost perception and the strongest willingness to acquire haze knowledge. Meanwhile, the empirical analysis revealed that political trust and cost perception could enhance the public's haze tolerance while perceived risk and haze knowledge had negative impacts on tolerance. Also, our research could provide some suggestions to government officials when making policies for abating haze pollution from the perspective of social risk control. Policy makers are supposed to launch various policy instruments to control haze effectively and engage the citizens in the decision-making process to improve their political trust, and publicize the knowledge of haze pollution to help the public to acquire objective and scientific knowledge and diminish unnecessary worries.

摘要

雾霾污染已成为中国最严重的环境风险,引起了公众的广泛关注。由于雾霾几乎影响到了所有污染地区的公民,因此将公众认知作为减轻雾霾的一个基本要素是必要且重要的。本文从社会心理学的角度出发,探讨了北京、上海和广州的雾霾容忍度,以及从政治信任、感知风险、成本感知和雾霾知识四个维度影响雾霾容忍度的关键因素。基于 517 名受访者的样本,结果表明,与上海和广州相比,北京居民对雾霾污染的容忍度最低,但对政府治理雾霾能力的信任度和自我评估的雾霾知识水平最高。上海居民的成本感知最低,获取雾霾知识的意愿最强。同时,实证分析表明,政治信任和成本感知可以提高公众对雾霾的容忍度,而感知风险和雾霾知识则对容忍度有负面影响。此外,我们的研究还可以从社会风险控制的角度为政府官员在制定雾霾治理政策时提供一些建议。政策制定者应该采取各种政策手段来有效控制雾霾,并让公众参与决策过程,以提高他们的政治信任,宣传雾霾污染知识,帮助公众获得客观和科学的知识,减少不必要的担忧。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e8b/6352209/1146d2e71086/ijerph-16-00287-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e8b/6352209/1146d2e71086/ijerph-16-00287-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e8b/6352209/1146d2e71086/ijerph-16-00287-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
The Influencing Factors of Haze Tolerance in China.中国雾霾容忍度的影响因素。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Jan 21;16(2):287. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16020287.
2
A comparison of individual exposure, perception, and acceptable levels of PM with air pollution policy objectives in China.中国个人暴露、感知与可接受的细颗粒物水平与空气污染政策目标的比较。
Environ Res. 2017 Aug;157:78-86. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2017.05.012. Epub 2017 May 17.
3
Public Perception of Haze Weather Based on Weibo Comments.基于微博评论的公众对雾霾天气的感知
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Nov 28;16(23):4767. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16234767.
4
Characteristics of public concern on haze in China and its relationship with air quality in urban areas.中国公众对雾霾的关注特征及其与城市空气质量的关系。
Sci Total Environ. 2018 Oct 1;637-638:1597-1606. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.04.382. Epub 2018 May 22.
5
Haze Attitudes and the Willingness to Pay for Haze Improvement: Evidence from Four Cities in Shandong Province, China.雾霾态度与改善雾霾的意愿支付:来自中国山东省四个城市的证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Oct 19;15(10):2297. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15102297.
6
Spatial characteristics and influencing factors of risk perception of haze in China: The case study of publishing online comments about haze news on Sina.中国霾风险感知的空间特征及其影响因素:以新浪网霾新闻在线评论为例。
Sci Total Environ. 2021 Sep 1;785:147236. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147236. Epub 2021 Apr 22.
7
Development and Validation of the Haze Risk Perception Scale and Influencing Factor Scale-A Study Based on College Students in Beijing.基于北京市大学生的霾风险感知量表和影响因素量表的编制与验证研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Apr 8;19(8):4510. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19084510.
8
[Characteristics of haze and its impact factors in four megacities in China during 2006-2009].[2006 - 2009年中国四大城市雾霾特征及其影响因素]
Huan Jing Ke Xue. 2013 Aug;34(8):2925-32.
9
Analysis of influential factors on air quality from global and local perspectives in China.从全球和本地视角分析中国空气质量的影响因素。
Environ Pollut. 2019 May;248:965-979. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2019.02.096. Epub 2019 Mar 3.
10
Escape or stay? Effects of haze pollution on domestic travel: Comparative analysis of different regions in China.逃离还是留下?雾霾污染对国内旅游的影响:中国不同地区的比较分析。
Sci Total Environ. 2019 Nov 10;690:151-157. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.06.415. Epub 2019 Jun 26.

引用本文的文献

1
The perception of air pollution and its health risk: a scoping review of measures and methods.空气污染及其健康风险感知:测量和方法的范围综述。
Glob Health Action. 2024 Dec 31;17(1):2370100. doi: 10.1080/16549716.2024.2370100. Epub 2024 Jun 28.
2
Public Concern about Haze and Ozone in the Era of Their Coordinated Control in China.公众对中国雾霾和臭氧协同控制时代的关注。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 4;20(2):911. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20020911.
3
Development and Validation of the Haze Risk Perception Scale and Influencing Factor Scale-A Study Based on College Students in Beijing.

本文引用的文献

1
Effect of the Fukushima nuclear accident on the risk perception of residents near a nuclear power plant in China.福岛核事故对中国某核电站附近居民风险感知的影响。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Dec 3;110(49):19742-7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1313825110. Epub 2013 Nov 18.
2
Evidence on the impact of sustained exposure to air pollution on life expectancy from China's Huai River policy.关于中国淮河流域政策对预期寿命受持续暴露于空气污染影响的证据。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Aug 6;110(32):12936-41. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1300018110. Epub 2013 Jul 8.
3
A comparative risk assessment of burden of disease and injury attributable to 67 risk factors and risk factor clusters in 21 regions, 1990-2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010.
基于北京市大学生的霾风险感知量表和影响因素量表的编制与验证研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Apr 8;19(8):4510. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19084510.
4
Exploring the relationship between life quality and the perceptions of living-environment crises.探索生活质量与对生活环境危机的认知之间的关系。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Apr 22;21(1):774. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-10861-2.
21 个地区 1990-2010 年 67 种致病因素和致病因素群导致的疾病和伤害负担的比较风险评估:全球疾病负担研究 2010 系统分析。
Lancet. 2012 Dec 15;380(9859):2224-60. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61766-8.
4
A cross-cultural study of perceived benefit versus risk as mediators in the trust-acceptance relationship.跨文化研究感知收益与风险在信任接受关系中的中介作用。
Risk Anal. 2011 Dec;31(12):1919-34. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01637.x. Epub 2011 May 23.
5
Living with nuclear power: A Q-method study of local community perceptions.与核能共存:一项关于当地社区认知的Q方法研究
Risk Anal. 2009 Aug;29(8):1089-104. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2009.01259.x. Epub 2009 Jul 8.
6
Reframing nuclear power in the UK energy debate: nuclear power, climate change mitigation and radioactive waste.在英国能源辩论中重新审视核能:核能、缓解气候变化与放射性废物
Public Underst Sci. 2008 Apr;17(2):145-69. doi: 10.1177/0963662506066719.
7
Attitudes as an expression of knowledge and "political anchoring": the case of nuclear power in the United Kingdom.作为知识表达和“政治定位”的态度:以英国的核电为例。
Risk Anal. 2008 Oct;28(5):1273-88. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01094.x. Epub 2008 Jul 8.
8
Local acceptance of a high-level nuclear waste repository.当地对高水平核废料储存库的接受程度。
Risk Anal. 2004 Jun;24(3):737-49. doi: 10.1111/j.0272-4332.2004.00472.x.
9
RADIATION AND OTHER RISKS.辐射及其他风险。
Health Phys. 1965 Sep;11:879-87. doi: 10.1097/00004032-196509000-00008.
10
Public response to the Tokai nuclear accident.公众对东海核事故的反应。
Risk Anal. 2001 Dec;21(6):1039-46. doi: 10.1111/0272-4332.216172.