Suppr超能文献

焦点小组及提高社区干预效果的其他方法——综述

Focus groups and other methods for increased effectiveness of community intervention--a review.

作者信息

Eriksson C G

机构信息

Nordic School of Public Health, Gothenburg, Sweden.

出版信息

Scand J Prim Health Care Suppl. 1988;1:73-80.

PMID:3067291
Abstract

In the evaluation of community intervention program both quantitative and qualitative methods are essential for analysis of effectiveness and impact. Evaluation of such programs is affected by unique theoretical, conceptual, methodological, analytical and political impediments. In this article different methods are briefly reviewed. Among these are survey methods, focus groups and related interview methods, ethnographic and other qualitative methods. In Orebro, a combination of qualitative and quantitative methods has been used in the planning of community intervention with two suburban areas. The quantitative approach was used to prioritize between different problems and intervention areas. The planning and implementation of the intervention were based on qualitative studies. Professionals, local citizens and the researchers cooperated in these action oriented research projects.

摘要

在社区干预项目的评估中,定量和定性方法对于分析效果和影响都至关重要。此类项目的评估受到独特的理论、概念、方法、分析及政治障碍的影响。本文简要回顾了不同的方法。其中包括调查方法、焦点小组及相关访谈方法、人种学和其他定性方法。在厄勒布鲁,定性和定量方法相结合被用于两个郊区社区干预的规划中。定量方法用于在不同问题和干预领域之间确定优先次序。干预的规划和实施基于定性研究。专业人员、当地居民和研究人员在这些以行动为导向的研究项目中进行了合作。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验