Eriksson C G
Nordic School of Public Health, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Scand J Prim Health Care Suppl. 1988;1:73-80.
In the evaluation of community intervention program both quantitative and qualitative methods are essential for analysis of effectiveness and impact. Evaluation of such programs is affected by unique theoretical, conceptual, methodological, analytical and political impediments. In this article different methods are briefly reviewed. Among these are survey methods, focus groups and related interview methods, ethnographic and other qualitative methods. In Orebro, a combination of qualitative and quantitative methods has been used in the planning of community intervention with two suburban areas. The quantitative approach was used to prioritize between different problems and intervention areas. The planning and implementation of the intervention were based on qualitative studies. Professionals, local citizens and the researchers cooperated in these action oriented research projects.
在社区干预项目的评估中，定量和定性方法对于分析效果和影响都至关重要。此类项目的评估受到独特的理论、概念、方法、分析及政治障碍的影响。本文简要回顾了不同的方法。其中包括调查方法、焦点小组及相关访谈方法、人种学和其他定性方法。在厄勒布鲁，定性和定量方法相结合被用于两个郊区社区干预的规划中。定量方法用于在不同问题和干预领域之间确定优先次序。干预的规划和实施基于定性研究。专业人员、当地居民和研究人员在这些以行动为导向的研究项目中进行了合作。
