Suppr超能文献

确保医疗界面上的患者护理连续性:住院后电话随访。

Ensuring continuity of patient care across the healthcare interface: Telephone follow-up post-hospitalization.

机构信息

Clinical and Practice Research Group, School of Pharmacy, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, BT9 7BL, UK.

Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Hashemite University, Jordan.

出版信息

Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2019 Mar;85(3):616-625. doi: 10.1111/bcp.13839. Epub 2019 Jan 24.

Abstract

AIMS

To implement pharmacist-led, postdischarge telephone follow-up (TFU) intervention and to evaluate its impact on rehospitalization parameters in polypharmacy patients, via comparison with a well-matched control group.

METHOD

Pragmatic, prospective, quasi-experimental study. Intervention patients were matched by propensity score techniques with a control group. Guided by results from a pilot study, clinical pharmacists implemented TFU intervention, added to routine integrated medicines management service.

RESULTS

Using an intention to treat approach, reductions in 30- and 90-day readmission rates for intervention patients compared with controls were 9.9% [odds ratio = 0.57; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.36-0.90; P < 0.001] and 15.2% (odds ratio = 0.53; 95% CI: 0.36-0.79; P = 0.021) respectively. Marginal mean time to readmission was 70.9 days (95% CI: 66.9-74.9) for intervention group compared with 60.1 days (95% CI: 55.4-64.7) for controls. Mean length of hospital stay compared with control was (8.3 days vs. 6.7 days; P < 0.001). Benefit: cost ratio for 30-day readmissions was 29.62, and 23.58 for 90-day interval. Per protocol analyses gave more marked improvements. In intervention patients, mean concern scale score, using Beliefs about Medicine Questionnaire, was reduced 3.2 (95% CI: -4.22 to -2.27; P < 0.001). Mean difference in Medication Adherence Report Scale was 1.4 (22.7 vs. 24.1; P < 0.001). Most patients (83.8%) reported having better control of their medicines after the intervention.

CONCLUSIONS

Pharmacist-led postdischarge structured TFU intervention can reduce 30- and 90-day readmission rates. Positive impacts were noted on time to readmission, length of hospital stay upon readmission, healthcare costs, patient beliefs about medicines, patient self-reported adherence and satisfaction.

摘要

目的

通过与匹配良好的对照组进行比较,实施药剂师主导的出院后电话随访(TFU)干预,并评估其对多种药物治疗患者再入院参数的影响。

方法

实用、前瞻性、准实验研究。通过倾向评分技术,将干预组患者与对照组患者进行匹配。在试点研究结果的指导下,临床药师实施 TFU 干预,作为常规综合药物管理服务的补充。

结果

采用意向治疗方法,与对照组相比,干预组患者的 30 天和 90 天再入院率分别降低了 9.9%(优势比=0.57;95%置信区间[CI]:0.36-0.90;P<0.001)和 15.2%(优势比=0.53;95%CI:0.36-0.79;P=0.021)。干预组再入院的边缘平均时间为 70.9 天(95%CI:66.9-74.9),而对照组为 60.1 天(95%CI:55.4-64.7)。与对照组相比,住院时间的平均长度为(8.3 天与 6.7 天;P<0.001)。30 天再入院的效益-成本比为 29.62,90 天间隔为 23.58。方案分析给出了更显著的改善。在干预组中,使用信念量表(Beliefs about Medicine Questionnaire),平均关注量表评分降低了 3.2(95%CI:-4.22 至-2.27;P<0.001)。用药依从性报告量表的平均差值为 1.4(22.7 与 24.1;P<0.001)。大多数患者(83.8%)表示在干预后对他们的药物有更好的控制。

结论

药剂师主导的出院后结构化 TFU 干预可以降低 30 天和 90 天的再入院率。在再入院时间、再入院时的住院时间、医疗保健成本、患者对药物的信念、患者自我报告的依从性和满意度方面都有积极影响。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

9
[Not Available].[无可用内容]
Can J Hosp Pharm. 2024 Jun 12;77(2):e3647. doi: 10.4212/cjhp.3647. eCollection 2024.
10
Danger Ahead-You Are Being Discharged.前方危险——你即将出院。
Can J Hosp Pharm. 2024 Jun 12;77(2):e3622. doi: 10.4212/cjhp.3622. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

5
7
Introduction to propensity scores.倾向评分简介。
Respirology. 2014 Jul;19(5):625-35. doi: 10.1111/resp.12312. Epub 2014 May 29.
10
Integrated literature review of postdischarge telephone calls.出院后电话随访的综合文献综述
West J Nurs Res. 2014 Jan;36(1):84-104. doi: 10.1177/0193945913491016. Epub 2013 Jul 4.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验