• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

电场能否解释运动皮质经颅直流电刺激的个体间变异性?

Can electric fields explain inter-individual variability in transcranial direct current stimulation of the motor cortex?

机构信息

Department of Electrical Engineering and Automation, Aalto University, Espoo, 02150, Finland.

Faculty of Rehabilitation, School of Health Sciences, Fujita Health University, Toyoake, 470-1192, Japan.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2019 Jan 24;9(1):626. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-37226-x.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-018-37226-x
PMID:30679770
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6345748/
Abstract

The effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on motor cortical excitability are highly variable between individuals. Inter-individual differences in the electric fields generated in the brain by tDCS might play a role in the variability. Here, we explored whether these fields are related to excitability changes following anodal tDCS of the primary motor cortex (M1). Motor evoked potentials (MEPs) were measured in 28 healthy subjects before and after 20 min sham or 1 mA anodal tDCS of right M1 in a double-blind crossover design. The electric fields were individually modelled based on magnetic resonance images. Statistical analysis indicated that the variability in the MEPs could be partly explained by the electric fields, subjects with the weakest and strongest fields tending to produce opposite changes in excitability. To explain the findings, we hypothesized that the likely locus of action was in the hand area of M1, and the effective electric field component was that in the direction normal to the cortical surface. Our results demonstrate that a large part of inter-individual variability in tDCS may be due to differences in the electric fields. If this is the case, electric field dosimetry could be useful for controlling the neuroplastic effects of tDCS.

摘要

经颅直流电刺激 (tDCS) 对运动皮质兴奋性的影响在个体之间差异很大。tDCS 在大脑中产生的电场的个体差异可能在这种变异性中起作用。在这里,我们探讨了这些电场是否与初级运动皮质 (M1) 阳极 tDCS 后的兴奋性变化有关。在双盲交叉设计中,28 名健康受试者在右 M1 接受 20 分钟假刺激或 1 mA 阳极 tDCS 之前和之后测量运动诱发电位 (MEP)。根据磁共振图像对电场进行个体建模。统计分析表明,MEP 的可变性可以部分解释为电场,电场最弱和最强的受试者倾向于产生相反的兴奋性变化。为了解释这些发现,我们假设作用的可能部位在手区的 M1,有效的电场分量是垂直于皮质表面的方向。我们的结果表明,tDCS 中很大一部分个体间变异性可能是由于电场的差异造成的。如果是这样,电场剂量测定可能有助于控制 tDCS 的神经可塑性效应。

相似文献

1
Can electric fields explain inter-individual variability in transcranial direct current stimulation of the motor cortex?电场能否解释运动皮质经颅直流电刺激的个体间变异性?
Sci Rep. 2019 Jan 24;9(1):626. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-37226-x.
2
Intra-Subject Consistency and Reliability of Response Following 2 mA Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation.2mA 经颅直流电刺激后的个体内反应一致性和可靠性。
Brain Stimul. 2016 Nov-Dec;9(6):819-825. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2016.06.052. Epub 2016 Jun 21.
3
Systematic assessment of duration and intensity of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation on primary motor cortex excitability.对阳极经颅直流电刺激对初级运动皮层兴奋性的持续时间和强度进行系统评估。
Eur J Neurosci. 2016 Sep;44(5):2184-90. doi: 10.1111/ejn.13321. Epub 2016 Jul 12.
4
Systematic evaluation of the impact of stimulation intensity on neuroplastic after-effects induced by transcranial direct current stimulation.经颅直流电刺激诱导的神经可塑性后效应中刺激强度影响的系统评价
J Physiol. 2017 Feb 15;595(4):1273-1288. doi: 10.1113/JP272738. Epub 2016 Nov 8.
5
Variability in response to transcranial direct current stimulation of the motor cortex.运动皮层经颅直流电刺激反应的变异性。
Brain Stimul. 2014 May-Jun;7(3):468-75. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2014.02.003. Epub 2014 Feb 15.
6
Inter- and Intra-individual Variability in Response to Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) at Varying Current Intensities.不同电流强度下经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)反应的个体间和个体内变异性。
Brain Stimul. 2015 Nov-Dec;8(6):1130-7. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2015.07.031. Epub 2015 Jul 23.
7
Slow-oscillatory transcranial direct current stimulation can induce bidirectional shifts in motor cortical excitability in awake humans.慢振荡经颅直流电刺激可在清醒人类中诱导运动皮质兴奋性的双向变化。
Neuroscience. 2010 Apr 14;166(4):1219-25. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2010.01.019. Epub 2010 Jan 18.
8
Current intensity- and polarity-specific online and aftereffects of transcranial direct current stimulation: An fMRI study.经颅直流电刺激的电流强度和极性特异性在线和后效:一项 fMRI 研究。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2020 Apr 15;41(6):1644-1666. doi: 10.1002/hbm.24901. Epub 2019 Dec 20.
9
Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation over the human motor cortex on corticospinal and transcallosal excitability.经颅直流电刺激人类运动皮层对皮质脊髓和胼胝体间兴奋性的影响。
Exp Brain Res. 2004 Jun;156(4):439-43. doi: 10.1007/s00221-003-1800-2. Epub 2004 Jan 24.
10
1H MR spectroscopy of the motor cortex immediately following transcranial direct current stimulation at 7 Tesla.7 特斯拉经颅直流电刺激后即刻运动皮质的 1H 磁共振波谱分析
PLoS One. 2018 Aug 29;13(8):e0198053. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0198053. eCollection 2018.

引用本文的文献

1
Generalized learning induced by training and tDCS is predicted by prefrontal cortical morphology.前额叶皮层形态可预测由训练和经颅直流电刺激诱导的广义学习。
Cereb Cortex. 2025 Aug 1;35(8). doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhaf229.
2
The effect of brain tissue anisotropy on the electric field caused by transcranial electric stimulation: Sensitivity analysis and magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography.脑组织各向异性对经颅电刺激所产生电场的影响:敏感性分析与磁共振电阻抗断层成像
Imaging Neurosci (Camb). 2025 Feb 26;3. doi: 10.1162/imag_a_00481. eCollection 2025.
3
Dose-response of tDCS effects on motor learning and cortical excitability: A preregistered study.

本文引用的文献

1
TMS Motor Thresholds Correlate With TDCS Electric Field Strengths in Hand Motor Area.经颅磁刺激运动阈值与手部运动区的经颅直流电刺激电场强度相关。
Front Neurosci. 2018 Jun 25;12:426. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2018.00426. eCollection 2018.
2
tDCS changes in motor excitability are specific to orientation of current flow.经颅直流电刺激引起的运动兴奋性变化与电流方向有关。
Brain Stimul. 2018 Mar-Apr;11(2):289-298. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2017.11.001. Epub 2017 Nov 7.
3
Multifocal tDCS targeting the resting state motor network increases cortical excitability beyond traditional tDCS targeting unilateral motor cortex.
经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)对运动学习和皮层兴奋性的剂量反应:一项预注册研究。
Imaging Neurosci (Camb). 2025 Jan 15;3. doi: 10.1162/imag_a_00431. eCollection 2025.
4
Electric-field-based dosing for TMS.基于电场的经颅磁刺激剂量控制
Imaging Neurosci (Camb). 2024 Mar 11;2. doi: 10.1162/imag_a_00106. eCollection 2024.
5
Timing-specific effects of single-session M1 anodal tDCS on motor sequence retention in healthy older adults.单次M1区阳极性经颅直流电刺激对健康老年人运动序列保持的时间特异性影响。
Neuroimage Rep. 2021 Apr 12;1(1):100009. doi: 10.1016/j.ynirp.2021.100009. eCollection 2021 Mar.
6
Anatomical Characteristics Predict Response to Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS): Development of a Computational Pipeline for Optimizing tDCS Protocols.解剖学特征预测经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)的反应:用于优化tDCS方案的计算流程的开发
Bioengineering (Basel). 2025 Jun 15;12(6):656. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering12060656.
7
The "Cocombola Study": A Physical Phantom Model for tDCS-Induced Electric Field Distribution.“可可博拉研究”:一种用于经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)诱导电场分布的物理体模模型。
Bioengineering (Basel). 2025 Mar 27;12(4):346. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering12040346.
8
Four dimensions of individualization in brain stimulation for psychiatric disorders: context, target, dose, and timing.用于精神疾病的脑刺激个体化的四个维度:背景、靶点、剂量和时机。
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2025 May;50(6):857-870. doi: 10.1038/s41386-025-02094-3. Epub 2025 Mar 27.
9
Individuals with psychosis receive less electric field strength during transcranial direct current stimulation compared to healthy controls.与健康对照组相比,患有精神病的个体在经颅直流电刺激期间接受的电场强度更低。
Schizophrenia (Heidelb). 2024 Nov 20;10(1):111. doi: 10.1038/s41537-024-00529-2.
10
Home-based transcranial direct current stimulation treatment for major depressive disorder: a fully remote phase 2 randomized sham-controlled trial.基于家庭的经颅直流电刺激治疗重度抑郁症:一项完全远程的2期随机假对照试验。
Nat Med. 2025 Jan;31(1):87-95. doi: 10.1038/s41591-024-03305-y. Epub 2024 Oct 21.
多焦点 tDCS 针对静息状态运动网络可增加皮质兴奋性,超过传统针对单侧运动皮质的 tDCS。
Neuroimage. 2017 Aug 15;157:34-44. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.05.060. Epub 2017 May 29.
4
Response variability of different anodal transcranial direct current stimulation intensities across multiple sessions.多次疗程中不同阳极经颅直流电刺激强度的反应变异性。
Brain Stimul. 2017 Jul-Aug;10(4):757-763. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2017.04.003. Epub 2017 Apr 10.
5
Systematic evaluation of the impact of stimulation intensity on neuroplastic after-effects induced by transcranial direct current stimulation.经颅直流电刺激诱导的神经可塑性后效应中刺激强度影响的系统评价
J Physiol. 2017 Feb 15;595(4):1273-1288. doi: 10.1113/JP272738. Epub 2016 Nov 8.
6
Bidirectional variability in motor cortex excitability modulation following 1 mA transcranial direct current stimulation in healthy participants.健康受试者接受1毫安经颅直流电刺激后运动皮层兴奋性调制的双向变异性。
Physiol Rep. 2016 Aug;4(15). doi: 10.14814/phy2.12884.
7
Electric fields of motor and frontal tDCS in a standard brain space: A computer simulation study.标准脑空间中运动和前额叶经颅直流电刺激的电场:一项计算机模拟研究。
Neuroimage. 2016 Aug 15;137:140-151. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.05.032. Epub 2016 May 14.
8
A technical guide to tDCS, and related non-invasive brain stimulation tools.经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)及相关非侵入性脑刺激工具技术指南。
Clin Neurophysiol. 2016 Feb;127(2):1031-1048. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2015.11.012. Epub 2015 Nov 22.
9
Inter- and Intra-individual Variability in Response to Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) at Varying Current Intensities.不同电流强度下经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)反应的个体间和个体内变异性。
Brain Stimul. 2015 Nov-Dec;8(6):1130-7. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2015.07.031. Epub 2015 Jul 23.
10
Inter-subject Variability in Electric Fields of Motor Cortical tDCS.运动皮质 tDCS 电场的个体间变异性。
Brain Stimul. 2015 Sep-Oct;8(5):906-13. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2015.05.002. Epub 2015 May 8.