Clinton Health Access Initiative, Boston, Massachussetts, United States of America.
Department of Medical Statistics, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, England.
PLoS One. 2019 Jan 25;14(1):e0210692. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0210692. eCollection 2019.
Integrating seasonal malaria chemoprevention (SMC), recommended by the WHO since 2012 to prevent malaria infection, with nutrition interventions may improve health outcomes and operational efficiencies. This study assessed the effects of co-packaging interventions on distribution coverage, nutrition, and clinical malaria outcomes in northern Nigeria. From August to November 2014, community volunteers delivered sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine and amodiaquine (SP-AQ) door-to-door each month to approximately 7,000 children aged 6-24 months in seven wards of Madobi, Kano State, Nigeria. In three of the wards children additionally received a lipid-based nutrient supplement (LNS-medium quantity), Plumpy Doz. Coverage, adherence, and anthropometric outcomes were assessed through baseline, midline, and endline household surveys. A facility-based case-control study was also conducted to estimate impact on clinical malaria outcomes. Coverage of SP-AQ was similar between arms at 89% (n = 2,409 child-months [88-90%]) in the SP-AQ only arm and 90% (n = 1,947 child-months [88-92%]) in the SP-AQ plus LNS arm (p = 0.52). Coverage of LNS was 83% (n = 2,409 child-months [81-84%]). Whilst there were marked changes in anthropometric status between baseline, midline and endline, these were largely accounted for by socioeconomic status and must be interpreted with care due to possible measurement issues, especially length-based indices. Overall nutritional status of our most robust measure, weight-for-age, does appear to have improved by endline, but was similar in the two study arms, suggesting no additional benefit of the LNS. While the odds of clinical malaria among those who received the intended intervention were lower in each study arm compared to children who did not receive interventions (SP-AQ only OR = 0.23 [0.09-0.6]; SP-AQ plus LNS OR = 0.22 [0.09-0.55]), LNS was not shown to have an additional impact. Coverage of SMC was high regardless of integrating LNS delivery into the SMC campaign. Supplementation with LNS did not appear to impact nutritional outcomes, but appeared to enhance the impact of SP-AQ on clinical odds of malaria. These results indicate that combining nutritional interventions with seasonal malaria chemoprevention in high-risk areas can be done successfully, warranting further exploration with other products or dosing. Trial Registration: ISRCTN 11413895.
将季节性疟疾化学预防(SMC)与营养干预措施相结合,这是世卫组织自 2012 年以来推荐的预防疟疾感染的方法,可能会改善健康结果和运营效率。本研究评估了在尼日利亚北部将包装干预措施与分布覆盖范围、营养和临床疟疾结果相结合的效果。2014 年 8 月至 11 月,社区志愿者每月向尼日利亚卡诺州马多比七个区约 7000 名 6-24 个月大的儿童挨家挨户提供磺胺多辛-乙胺嘧啶和阿莫地喹(SP-AQ)。在其中三个区,儿童还额外收到了一种基于脂质的营养素补充剂(中剂量 Plumpy Doz)。通过基线、中期和期末家庭调查评估了覆盖范围、依从性和人体测量学结果。还进行了一项基于设施的病例对照研究,以估计对临床疟疾结果的影响。在仅接受 SP-AQ 组,SP-AQ 的覆盖率为 89%(n = 2409 个儿童月[88-90%]),在接受 SP-AQ 加 LNS 组,覆盖率为 90%(n = 1947 个儿童月[88-92%])(p = 0.52)。LNS 的覆盖率为 83%(n = 2409 个儿童月[81-84%])。虽然在基线、中期和期末之间,人体测量学状况发生了明显变化,但这主要归因于社会经济地位,并且由于可能存在测量问题,特别是基于长度的指数,因此必须谨慎解释。我们最可靠的测量指标体重与年龄的比值表明,总体营养状况在期末有所改善,但在两个研究组中相似,这表明 LNS 没有带来额外的益处。与未接受干预的儿童相比,接受预期干预的儿童中临床疟疾的几率在每个研究组中均较低(仅接受 SP-AQ 的 OR = 0.23 [0.09-0.6];接受 SP-AQ 加 LNS 的 OR = 0.22 [0.09-0.55]),但 LNS 并未显示出额外的影响。无论是否将 LNS 纳入 SMC 运动,SMC 的覆盖率都很高。补充 LNS 似乎不会影响营养结果,但似乎增强了 SP-AQ 对临床疟疾几率的影响。这些结果表明,在高风险地区将营养干预措施与季节性疟疾化学预防相结合可以成功实施,值得进一步探索其他产品或剂量。试验注册:ISRCTN 85152017。