Suppr超能文献

哥斯达黎加塔马林卡香蕉和大蕉生产中的农药使用情况及当地行为者的风险认知

Pesticide use in banana and plantain production and risk perception among local actors in Talamanca, Costa Rica.

机构信息

Central American Institute for Studies on Toxic Substances, Universidad Nacional, Heredia, Costa Rica.

出版信息

Environ Res. 2011 Jul;111(5):708-17. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2011.02.009. Epub 2011 Mar 10.

Abstract

The Talamanca County in Costa Rica has large-scale banana and small-scale plantain production, probably causing pesticide exposure in indigenous children. We explored to what extent different community actors are aware of children's pesticide hazards and how their awareness related to socio-economical and cultural conditions. Methods comprised eight focus groups with fathers and mothers separately, 27 semi-structured interviews to key actors, and field observations. As a whole, the indigenous plantain farmers and banana plantation workers had some general knowledge of pesticides concerning crop protection, but little on acute health effects, and hardly any on exposure routes and pathways, and chronic effects. People expressed vague ideas about pesticide risks. Inter-community differences were related to pesticide technologies used in banana and plantain production, employment status on a multinational plantation versus smallholder status, and gender. Compared to formalized practices on transnational company plantations, where workers reported to feel protected, pesticide handling by plantain smallholders was not perceived as hazardous and therefore no safety precautions were applied. Large-scale monoculture was perceived as one of the most important problems leading to pesticide risks in Talamanca on banana plantations, and also on neighboring small plantain farms extending into large areas. Plantain farmers have adopted use of highly toxic pesticides following banana production, but in conditions of extreme poverty. Aerial spraying in banana plantations was considered by most social actors a major determinant of exposure for the population living nearby these plantations, including vulnerable children. We observed violations of legally established aerial spraying distances. Economic considerations were most mentioned as the underlying reason for the pesticide use: economic needs to obtain the production quantity and quality, and pressure to use pesticides by other economic agents such as middlemen. Risk perceptions were modulated by factors such as people's tasks and positions in the production process, gender, and people's possibilities to define their own social conditions (more fatalistic perceptions among banana workers). The challenge for the future is to combine these insights into improved health risk assessment and management that is culturally adequate for each particular community and agricultural context.

摘要

哥斯达黎加的塔马拉坎卡县大规模种植香蕉和小规模种植大蕉,可能导致土著儿童接触农药。我们探讨了不同社区行为者在何种程度上意识到儿童面临的农药危害,以及他们的意识与社会经济和文化条件的关系。方法包括分别与父亲和母亲进行 8 次焦点小组讨论、27 次对主要行为者的半结构访谈和实地观察。总的来说,土著大蕉种植者和香蕉种植园工人对作物保护方面的农药有一些基本知识,但对急性健康影响知之甚少,对接触途径和途径以及慢性影响几乎一无所知。人们对农药风险有模糊的认识。社区间的差异与香蕉和大蕉生产中使用的农药技术、在跨国公司种植园工作的就业状况与小农户身份以及性别有关。与跨国公司种植园的规范化做法相比,工人报告感到受到保护,大蕉小农户处理农药的方式没有被认为是危险的,因此没有采取任何安全预防措施。大规模单一栽培被认为是导致塔马拉坎卡香蕉种植园以及邻近大蕉农场大面积农药风险的最重要问题之一。香蕉种植园的大蕉种植者采用了高度有毒的农药,但条件是极端贫困。大多数社会行为者认为,香蕉种植园的空中喷洒是附近居民接触农药的一个主要决定因素,包括弱势儿童。我们观察到违反了法律规定的空中喷洒距离。经济考虑是大多数人提到的使用农药的根本原因:需要获得产量和质量的经济需要,以及中间商等其他经济代理人使用农药的压力。风险认知受到人们在生产过程中的任务和地位、性别以及人们定义自己社会条件的可能性等因素的调节(香蕉工人的看法更为宿命)。未来的挑战是将这些见解结合起来,以改进对每个特定社区和农业背景都具有文化适当性的健康风险评估和管理。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验