Department of Psychology, Florida International University.
J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2020 Mar-Apr;49(2):215-228. doi: 10.1080/15374416.2018.1547968. Epub 2019 Jan 28.
Adults with childhood attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) experience impairment in core functional domains (e.g., educational attainment, occupational status, social relationships, substance abuse, and criminal behavior), but it is currently unclear which impairments co-occur and whether subgroups experience differentiable patterns, none, or all aforementioned functional domains. Latent profile analysis (LPA) was used to characterize patterns of impairment. Data from the Pittsburgh ADHD Longitudinal Study were used. The 317 participants were 25 years old and had childhood ADHD. LPA characterized the variability across substance use (alcohol consumption, cigarette smoking, marijuana use), criminal behavior, peer impairment, educational attainment, maternal relationship, financial dependence, and sexual activity among young adults with childhood ADHD. Childhood predictors of profiles were examined, and ADHD profiles were compared to a matched comparison group without ADHD also followed longitudinally ( = 217). Five profiles were found: prototypic impairment group (54%), high binge-drinking group (17%), high marijuana use group (10%), high criminal activity group (3%), and high cross-domain impairment group (17%). All profiles were impaired compared to non-ADHD young adults. Childhood variables rarely significantly predicted profiles. Young adults with childhood ADHD have differentiable impairment patterns that vary based on substance use, criminal behavior, and number of clinically impaired domains. Nearly all young adult ADHD profiles were impaired in peer, educational, and financial domains, and there was not a nonimpaired ADHD profile. Use of specific substances was elevated among subgroups of, but not all, young adults with ADHD histories. Finally, the high cross-domain impairment profile was impaired in all domains.
成人注意缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)患者在核心功能领域(例如,教育程度、职业状况、社会关系、药物滥用和犯罪行为)存在障碍,但目前尚不清楚哪些障碍同时存在,以及是否存在亚组表现出不同的、无或所有上述功能障碍。潜在剖面分析(LPA)用于描述损伤模式。使用匹兹堡 ADHD 纵向研究的数据。317 名参与者年龄为 25 岁,且患有儿童 ADHD。LPA 描述了患有儿童 ADHD 的年轻人在物质使用(饮酒、吸烟、大麻使用)、犯罪行为、同伴障碍、教育程度、母子关系、经济依赖和性行为方面的变异性。检查了儿童期预测因子与模式的相关性,并将 ADHD 模式与同时进行纵向随访的无 ADHD 匹配对照组(n=217)进行了比较。发现了五个模式:典型损伤组(54%)、高度狂饮组(17%)、高度大麻使用组(10%)、高度犯罪活动组(3%)和高跨域损伤组(17%)。与非 ADHD 年轻成年人相比,所有模式均存在损伤。儿童期变量很少能显著预测模式。患有儿童 ADHD 的年轻成年人存在不同的损伤模式,这些模式基于物质使用、犯罪行为和临床受损领域的数量而有所不同。几乎所有 ADHD 年轻成年人的损伤模式都在同伴、教育和财务领域存在损伤,而且没有非损伤性的 ADHD 模式。特定物质的使用在 ADHD 病史的年轻成年人亚组中升高,但并非所有亚组都升高。最后,高跨域损伤模式在所有领域都存在损伤。