• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

让家属参与已故器官捐献研究——一个团队的经验反思。

Engaging family partners in deceased organ donation research-a reflection on one team's experience.

机构信息

Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada.

Canadian National Transplant Research Program, Edmonton, Canada.

出版信息

Can J Anaesth. 2019 Apr;66(4):406-413. doi: 10.1007/s12630-018-01287-3. Epub 2019 Jan 28.

DOI:10.1007/s12630-018-01287-3
PMID:30690672
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9630241/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Clinical researchers are now encouraged to include patient partners in all research projects. Nevertheless, published accounts of patient engagement in complex research projects, such as those involving critically ill and dying patients, are lacking. Whether this absence is due to the relatively new emergence of patient engagement research methods or fundamental challenges regarding family engagement in challenging research contexts is unclear. We describe our experiences with forming a researcher-family partnership in a deceased organ donation research project involving the prospective observation of potential and actual deceased organ donors dying in the intensive care unit.

METHODS

We used the Guidance for Reporting Involvement of Patients and the Public evidence-based, consensus-informed reporting guidelines to organize our narrative.

RESULTS

We were able to initiate and sustain a research consultant relationship with the mother of a deceased organ donor for over two years. Challenges faced included: constraints on money and time, communication preferences, and the emotional stress of participating in difficult conversations. Positive outcomes included: improvement of data collection tools, new opportunities for access to research populations, and motivation to include family partnership in future grant proposals.

CONCLUSIONS

Family engagement in deceased organ donation research is feasible and contributes positively to study progress and outcomes. Patient and family engagement in challenging research contexts may require special attention to the emotional challenges of participation. We hope that our experience will encourage clinical researchers working in deceased organ donation and similarly complex domains to consider including patient partners in their projects.

摘要

目的

现在鼓励临床研究人员将患者伙伴纳入所有研究项目中。然而,缺乏关于患者参与复杂研究项目(如涉及病危和垂死患者的研究项目)的发表报道。这种缺失是由于患者参与研究方法的相对新出现,还是由于在具有挑战性的研究环境中涉及家庭参与的基本挑战尚不清楚。我们描述了在一项涉及对重症监护病房中潜在和实际已故器官捐献者进行前瞻性观察的已故器官捐献研究项目中,我们在形成研究人员-家庭伙伴关系方面的经验。

方法

我们使用了《涉及患者和公众参与的报告指南》中的循证共识指导原则,对我们的叙述进行了组织。

结果

我们能够与一位已故器官捐献者的母亲建立并维持超过两年的研究顾问关系。面临的挑战包括:资金和时间的限制、沟通偏好以及参与艰难对话的情绪压力。积极的结果包括:改进了数据收集工具、为研究人群提供了新的机会,以及激励在未来的资助提案中纳入家庭伙伴关系。

结论

在已故器官捐献研究中,家庭参与是可行的,并对研究进展和结果产生积极影响。在具有挑战性的研究环境中,患者和家庭的参与可能需要特别关注参与的情绪挑战。我们希望我们的经验将鼓励在已故器官捐献和类似复杂领域工作的临床研究人员考虑将患者伙伴纳入他们的项目中。

相似文献

1
Engaging family partners in deceased organ donation research-a reflection on one team's experience.让家属参与已故器官捐献研究——一个团队的经验反思。
Can J Anaesth. 2019 Apr;66(4):406-413. doi: 10.1007/s12630-018-01287-3. Epub 2019 Jan 28.
2
Canada-DONATE study protocol: a prospective national observational study of the medical management of deceased organ donors.加拿大捐赠研究方案:一项关于已故器官捐献者医疗管理的全国前瞻性观察研究。
BMJ Open. 2017 Sep 28;7(9):e018858. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018858.
3
Increasing the participation of intensive care unit nurses to promote deceased donor organ donation.提高重症监护病房护士的参与度以促进已故捐赠者器官捐献。
Transplant Proc. 2010 Apr;42(3):716-8. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2010.03.022.
4
COMmunication with Families regarding ORgan and Tissue donation after death in intensive care (COMFORT): protocol for an intervention study.重症监护室死亡后与家属就器官和组织捐赠进行沟通(COMFORT):一项干预性研究的方案
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Jan 17;17(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1964-7.
5
Balancing hope and despair at the end of life: The contribution of organ and tissue donation.在生命尽头平衡希望与绝望:器官和组织捐赠的作用。
J Crit Care. 2016 Apr;32:73-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2015.11.026. Epub 2015 Dec 9.
6
Designing a co-productive study to overcome known methodological challenges in organ donation research with bereaved family members.设计一项合作性研究,以克服器官捐赠研究中与丧亲家庭成员相关的已知方法学挑战。
Health Expect. 2019 Aug;22(4):824-835. doi: 10.1111/hex.12894. Epub 2019 May 6.
7
A narrative review of family members' experience of organ donation request after brain death in the critical care setting.对重症监护环境中脑死亡后器官捐献请求家属体验的叙述性回顾。
Intensive Care Med. 2019 Mar;45(3):331-342. doi: 10.1007/s00134-019-05575-4. Epub 2019 Mar 6.
8
Honoring deceased donors with a unique family-designed statement followed by a moment of silence: effect on donation outcomes.用独特的、由家属设计的声明向已故捐赠者致敬,随后默哀片刻:对捐赠结果的影响。
Prog Transplant. 2013 Jun;23(2):188-93. doi: 10.7182/pit2013471.
9
Family bereavement: A case study of controlled organ donation after circulatory death.家庭丧亲:心脏死亡后控制器官捐献的案例研究。
Nurs Crit Care. 2019 Jul;24(4):229-234. doi: 10.1111/nicc.12436. Epub 2019 May 29.
10
Experiences of Families Following Organ Donation Consent: A Qualitative Systematic Review.器官捐赠同意后家庭的经历:一项定性系统综述
Transplant Proc. 2021 Mar;53(2):501-512. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2020.09.016. Epub 2021 Jan 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Sexual and gender minoritized persons in organ and tissue donation: a qualitative analysis.器官和组织捐赠中的性少数群体和性别少数群体:一项定性分析。
Can J Anaesth. 2025 Jul 15. doi: 10.1007/s12630-025-03011-4.
2
Establishing patient partners' roles on research teams: a scoping review.确定患者合作伙伴在研究团队中的角色:一项范围综述
Res Involv Engagem. 2024 Dec 18;10(1):129. doi: 10.1186/s40900-024-00664-1.
3
Research and Innovation in Organ Donation: Recommendations From an International Consensus Forum.器官捐献的研究与创新:国际共识论坛的建议
Transplant Direct. 2023 Apr 28;9(5):e1446. doi: 10.1097/TXD.0000000000001446. eCollection 2023 May.
4
Knowledge gaps in the definition and determination of death.死亡定义与判定方面的知识空白。
Can J Anaesth. 2023 Apr;70(4):610-616. doi: 10.1007/s12630-023-02422-5. Epub 2023 May 2.

本文引用的文献

1
What constitutes meaningful engagement for patients and families as partners on research teams?患者及其家属作为研究团队的合作伙伴,什么样的参与才算有意义?
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2018 Jul;23(3):158-167. doi: 10.1177/1355819618762960. Epub 2018 Mar 4.
2
Questioning patient engagement: research scientists' perceptions of the challenges of patient engagement in a cardiovascular research network.对患者参与度的质疑:研究科学家对心血管研究网络中患者参与挑战的看法。
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2017 Sep 13;11:1573-1583. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S135457. eCollection 2017.
3
Perspectives of Patients, Caregivers and Researchers on Research Priorities in Donation and Transplantation in Canada: A Pilot Workshop.加拿大患者、护理人员及研究人员对捐赠与移植研究重点的看法:一次试点研讨会
Transplant Direct. 2017 Jan 17;3(2):e127. doi: 10.1097/TXD.0000000000000639. eCollection 2017 Feb.
4
Early assessment of the 10-step patient engagement framework for patient-centred outcomes research studies: the first three steps.以患者为中心的结局研究的10步患者参与框架的早期评估:前三个步骤
Fam Pract. 2017 Jun 1;34(3):272-277. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmx013.
5
Tokenism in patient engagement.患者参与中的表面应付行为
Fam Pract. 2017 Jun 1;34(3):290-295. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmw097.
6
From tokenism to empowerment: progressing patient and public involvement in healthcare improvement.从象征主义到赋权:推动患者及公众参与医疗保健改善
BMJ Qual Saf. 2016 Aug;25(8):626-32. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004839. Epub 2016 Mar 18.
7
Transdisciplinary tour-de-force: The Canadian National Transplant Research Program.跨学科的杰作:加拿大国家移植研究项目
Transplantation. 2016 Mar;100(3):466-70. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000001138.
8
Need to define patient engagement in research.需要定义患者在研究中的参与度。
CMAJ. 2015 Sep 8;187(12):E385-6. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.109-5109. Epub 2015 Jul 27.
9
Patient and Stakeholder Engagement in the PCORI Pilot Projects: Description and Lessons Learned.患者及利益相关者参与患者为中心的结果研究所试点项目:描述与经验教训
J Gen Intern Med. 2016 Jan;31(1):13-21. doi: 10.1007/s11606-015-3450-z. Epub 2015 Jul 10.
10
Patient engagement in research: a systematic review.患者参与研究:一项系统评价。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Feb 26;14:89. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-89.