Suppr超能文献

皮肤微生物组研究:拭子与活检。

Investigation of the skin microbiome: swabs vs. biopsies.

机构信息

Department of Microbiology, Tumor and Cell Biology, Stockholm, Sweden.

Centre for Translational Microbiome Research (CTMR), Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.

出版信息

Br J Dermatol. 2019 Sep;181(3):572-579. doi: 10.1111/bjd.17691. Epub 2019 May 6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Human skin is populated by diverse bacteria and there is increasing evidence that resident bacteria play a key role initiating immune responses in cutaneous diseases such as atopic dermatitis, psoriasis and hidradenitis suppurativa. Bacteria are present at all layers of the skin but many studies have relied on swabs to profile the skin microbiota.

OBJECTIVES

As the pathogenesis of many skin conditions is dermal, we wanted to compare the microbiota obtained in swabs (surface) and biopsies (dermis).

METHODS

Using 16S rRNA gene sequencing we established the microbial profiles of skin swabs and skin biopsies in 16 patients.

RESULTS

We found differences in both diversity and taxonomic composition of the microbiome obtained from swabs and biopsies of the same individual. Several taxa were found to be more abundant in the swabs, which displayed significantly higher community richness, but Clostridiales and Bacteroidetes were significantly enriched in the biopsies. Most published research on cutaneous microbiota has been based on skin swabs, which represent the surface of the skin.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study demonstrated a clear difference between the microbiome observed from skin swabs and skin biopsies. These findings may be highly relevant in disorders such as psoriasis where pathogenesis arises in the dermis. What's already known about this topic? 16S RNA gene sequencing has facilitated study of the skin microbiome. Several studies have sequenced the microbiome sampled by skin swabs. What does this study add? The microbiome data obtained using swabs and biopsies were different. Diseases that are predominantly dermal should be studied using both swabs and biopsies.

摘要

背景

人类皮肤中存在着多样化的细菌,越来越多的证据表明,常驻细菌在特应性皮炎、银屑病和化脓性汗腺炎等皮肤疾病中启动免疫反应方面发挥着关键作用。细菌存在于皮肤的所有层中,但许多研究依赖于拭子来分析皮肤微生物组。

目的

由于许多皮肤状况的发病机制是真皮的,我们想比较从拭子(表面)和活检(真皮)中获得的微生物组。

方法

使用 16S rRNA 基因测序,我们在 16 名患者中建立了皮肤拭子和皮肤活检的微生物特征。

结果

我们发现从同一患者的拭子和活检中获得的微生物组在多样性和分类组成上存在差异。一些分类群在拭子中更为丰富,其显示出明显更高的群落丰富度,但梭状芽胞杆菌和拟杆菌门在活检中明显富集。大多数关于皮肤微生物组的已发表研究都是基于皮肤拭子,它代表皮肤的表面。

结论

我们的研究表明,从皮肤拭子和皮肤活检中观察到的微生物组之间存在明显差异。这些发现可能与银屑病等疾病高度相关,因为这些疾病的发病机制源于真皮。

关于这个主题已经知道了什么?16S RNA 基因测序促进了皮肤微生物组的研究。已经有几项研究对通过皮肤拭子取样的微生物组进行了测序。本研究有何新发现?使用拭子和活检获得的微生物组数据不同。主要是真皮的疾病应该同时使用拭子和活检进行研究。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验