Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 1988 Oct 14;5(4):271-80. doi: 10.1016/s0168-8227(88)80062-7.
In 1984, the Japan Diabetes Society organized a committee to collect data on diabetic twins in Japan. Within 3 years, through correspondence with Society members and hospitals, the Committee had contacted 87 pairs of twins, one or both of which had diabetes mellitus or glucose intolerance. Sixty-three pairs were monozygotic and 24 dizygotic. The probands, who had been diagnosed as diabetic or glucose-intolerant earlier, included 21 patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM), 56 with non-insulin-dependent diabetes (NIDDM), one with an unknown type of diabetes, and nine with glucose intolerance. Concordance between monozygotic twins was 45% for IDDM and 83% for NIDDM; between dizygotic twins, concordance was 0% (0/10) for IDDM and 40% (4/10) for NIDDM. Concordance was significantly greater in NIDDM than in IDDM, and in monozygotic than in dizygotic twins. Concordance was greater among twins in which one twin had developed diabetes after the age of 20 than among twins in which the age of onset had been earlier. There was no evidence that the period of discordance was shorter in the discordant pairs than in the concordant pairs. About 90% of the IDDM twin pairs lived together, against 20% of the NIDDM pairs, probably due to the later age of onset of NIDDM. The frequency of diabetes in family members other than the twins was higher in NIDDM than in IDDM regardless of concordance. In concordant pairs the presence or absence of various complications agreed in 68-97%; a few pairs were discordant for the severity of retinopathy, which may have resulted from differences in duration and hyperglycemic degree. A 75-g glucose tolerance test administered to the 'normal' discordant twins revealed borderline glucose intolerance in two of six IDDM co-twins and six of eight NIDDM co-twins. The early-phase insulin response was low in two of six IDDM co-twins and four of six NIDDM co-twins. These results are generally consistent with previous reports of diabetic twins in Western countries, reinforcing the importance of genetic factors in the pathogenesis of diabetes. Heredity has a particularly strong influence in NIDDM.
1984年,日本糖尿病学会组织了一个委员会,以收集日本糖尿病双胞胎的数据。在3年内,该委员会通过与学会成员和医院通信,联系了87对双胞胎,其中一方或双方患有糖尿病或葡萄糖耐量异常。63对为单卵双胞胎,24对为双卵双胞胎。先证者中,较早被诊断为糖尿病或葡萄糖耐量异常的包括21例胰岛素依赖型糖尿病(IDDM)患者、56例非胰岛素依赖型糖尿病(NIDDM)患者、1例糖尿病类型不明的患者以及9例葡萄糖耐量异常患者。单卵双胞胎中IDDM的一致性为45%,NIDDM为83%;双卵双胞胎中,IDDM的一致性为0%(0/10),NIDDM为40%(4/10)。NIDDM的一致性显著高于IDDM,单卵双胞胎的一致性高于双卵双胞胎。发病年龄在20岁以后的双胞胎之间的一致性高于发病年龄较早的双胞胎。没有证据表明不一致的双胞胎对中不一致的时间比一致的双胞胎对短。约90%的IDDM双胞胎对生活在一起,而NIDDM双胞胎对为20%,这可能是由于NIDDM发病较晚。无论是否一致,NIDDM患者中双胞胎以外家庭成员的糖尿病发病率均高于IDDM。在一致的双胞胎对中,各种并发症的有无一致性为68% - 97%;少数双胞胎对在视网膜病变严重程度上不一致,这可能是由于病程和高血糖程度不同所致。对“正常”的不一致双胞胎进行的75克葡萄糖耐量试验显示,6例IDDM双胞胎中的2例和8例NIDDM双胞胎中的6例存在临界葡萄糖耐量异常。6例IDDM双胞胎中的2例和6例NIDDM双胞胎中的4例早期胰岛素反应较低。这些结果总体上与西方国家之前关于糖尿病双胞胎的报道一致,强化了遗传因素在糖尿病发病机制中的重要性。遗传因素在NIDDM中影响尤为强烈。