Prof. Dr. Ivan Bautmans, Gerontology department, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Laarbeeklaan 103, B-1090 Brussels, Belgium, Tel: +3224774207; E-mail:
J Nutr Health Aging. 2019;23(2):221-224. doi: 10.1007/s12603-019-1155-4.
Previously, we developed and validated an easy test to measure muscle fatigability during sustained maximal handgrip contraction in older persons using a Martin Vigorimeter device. This study aimed at validating the equation to estimate grip work (GW) during sustained maximal handgrip contraction, by monitoring continuously the grip strength (GS) decay using a Jamar Dynamometer-like (JD) device.
Cross sectional, explorative study.
Data collection took place at The National Research Centre for the Working Environment in Copenhagen, Denmark.
962 subjects, belonging to a subgroup of the Copenhagen Aging and Midlife Biobank, were enrolled.
GS was recorded continuously during sustained maximal contraction until it dropped to 50% of its maximum and fatigue resistance (FR, time to fatigue) was noted. GW, area under the force-time curve, was compared to its estimate which was calculated as GWestimated=GSmax0.75FR.
Excellent correlation was found between GWestimated and GWmeasured (R²=0.98 p<0.001). The equation slightly overestimated GW by 6.04 kg*s (95% CI[-0.08, 12.15]) with a coefficient of variation method error of 6%.
GW estimation is a valid parameter reflecting muscle work output during a sustained maximal grip effort in healthy middle-aged community-dwelling persons when using a JD. GW estimation is a promising outcome parameter in comprehensive geriatric assessment and its validation for commonly used instruments in geriatric practice will increase its clinical implementation.
此前,我们开发并验证了一种简单的测试,使用 Martin Vigorimeter 设备测量老年人持续最大握力收缩期间的肌肉疲劳性。本研究旨在通过使用类似于 Jamar 测力计(JD)的设备连续监测握力(GS)衰减来验证估计持续最大握力收缩期间握力功(GW)的方程。
横截面、探索性研究。
数据收集在丹麦哥本哈根的国家工作环境研究中心进行。
962 名受试者,属于哥本哈根衰老和中年生物库的一个亚组,被纳入研究。
在持续最大收缩期间连续记录 GS,直到其降至最大握力的 50%,并记录疲劳抵抗(FR,疲劳时间)。比较 GW(力-时间曲线下的面积)与其估计值,估计值计算为 GWestimated=GSmax0.75FR。
发现 GWestimated 与 GWmeasured 之间存在极好的相关性(R²=0.98,p<0.001)。该方程略微高估了 GW,高估了 6.04 公斤*秒(95%CI[-0.08, 12.15]),变异系数方法误差为 6%。
当使用 JD 时,GW 估计是一种反映健康中年社区居住者持续最大握力努力期间肌肉工作输出的有效参数。GW 估计是综合老年评估中的一个有前途的结果参数,其在老年实践中常用仪器的验证将增加其临床实施。