• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

制定并验证用于记录处方药品配发情况的工具。

Development and content validation of an instrument to document the dispensing of prescribed medicines.

机构信息

Laboratory of Teaching and Research in Social Pharmacy (LEPFS), Department of Pharmacy, Federal University of Sergipe, São Cristóvão, Brazil.

出版信息

J Clin Pharm Ther. 2019 Jun;44(3):430-439. doi: 10.1111/jcpt.12803. Epub 2019 Jan 30.

DOI:10.1111/jcpt.12803
PMID:30701567
Abstract

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE

Qualified dispensing is fundamental for the promotion of the rational use of medicines. Documentation is an indicator of quality and one of the essential steps in the care process. However, in Brazil, there are no models of clinical documentation applicable to dispensing practices. Thus, the objective of this study was to develop and validate an instrument to document the dispensing process of prescribed medicines.

METHODS

A methodological development study was carried out from February 2017 to October 2017 in two stages, which were (i) the development of the instrument and (ii) content validation of the proposed instrument. The development phase comprised three stages, which were (i) the elaboration of the prototype based on a previously performed systematic review, (ii) academic brainstorming and (iii) a pre-Delphi consensus. The content validation process was performed using the Delphi technique. The instrument was sent to 40 experts with experience in dispensing, and the consensus among them was calculated using the content validity index (CVI). The study was approved by the Ethics Committee, and all participants signed an informed consent document detailing the terms of the study.

RESULTS

In the development stage, three versions of the instrument were generated, which were the prototype, version 1 (changed after academic brainstorming) and version 2 (changed after the pre-Delphi). In the content validation process of version 2 of the instrument, 23 experts returned their evaluation in the first round of the Delphi process and 17 in the second. All the items obtained a CVI >0.83, which resulted in the validation of the instrument. The final instrument comprised the following sections: general information, the identification of technical and legal problems of prescriptions, the conduct for the resolution of the technical and legal problems of prescriptions, medication dispensed, suspected drug-related problems, verbal guidance, written guidance, referral and the referral result.

WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION

The developed and validated instrument presents the main variables that should be documented during the dispensing process.

摘要

已知和目的

合格的配药对于促进合理用药至关重要。文件记录是质量的一个指标,也是护理过程的基本步骤之一。然而,在巴西,没有适用于配药实践的临床文件记录模式。因此,本研究的目的是开发和验证一种记录处方药品配药过程的工具。

方法

一项方法学开发研究于 2017 年 2 月至 10 月进行,分两个阶段进行,即(i)工具的开发和(ii)拟议工具的内容验证。开发阶段包括三个阶段,即(i)基于先前进行的系统评价制定原型,(ii)学术头脑风暴和(iii)预 Delphi 共识。内容验证过程使用 Delphi 技术进行。该工具被发送给 40 名具有配药经验的专家,他们之间的共识使用内容有效性指数(CVI)进行计算。该研究获得了伦理委员会的批准,所有参与者都签署了一份知情同意书,详细说明了研究的条款。

结果

在开发阶段,生成了三个版本的工具,即原型、版本 1(学术头脑风暴后更改)和版本 2(预 Delphi 后更改)。在工具版本 2 的内容验证过程中,23 名专家在 Delphi 过程的第一轮中返回了他们的评估,17 名专家在第二轮中返回了他们的评估。所有项目的 CVI>0.83,从而验证了工具的有效性。最终的工具包括以下部分:一般信息、处方技术和法律问题的识别、解决处方技术和法律问题的行为、配发的药物、疑似与药物相关的问题、口头指导、书面指导、转诊和转诊结果。

新内容和结论

开发和验证的工具具有在配药过程中应记录的主要变量。

相似文献

1
Development and content validation of an instrument to document the dispensing of prescribed medicines.制定并验证用于记录处方药品配发情况的工具。
J Clin Pharm Ther. 2019 Jun;44(3):430-439. doi: 10.1111/jcpt.12803. Epub 2019 Jan 30.
2
Development and content validation of an instrument to support pharmaceutical counselling for dispensing of prescribed medicines.支持药剂师为患者配发处方药的药学咨询工具的编制与内容验证。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2020 Feb;26(1):134-141. doi: 10.1111/jep.13102. Epub 2019 Jan 31.
3
Validation of instrument to assess software of patients' risk classification.用于评估患者风险分类软件的工具的验证
Rev Bras Enferm. 2018 May;71(3):975-982. doi: 10.1590/0034-7167-2017-0053.
4
Design and content validation of an instrument measuring user perception of the persuasive design principles in a breastfeeding mHealth app: A modified Delphi study.测量母乳喂养移动健康应用程序中用户对劝导设计原则感知的工具的设计和内容验证:一项改良德尔菲研究。
Int J Med Inform. 2022 Aug;164:104789. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2022.104789. Epub 2022 May 10.
5
Consensus for vaginal stenosis prevention in patients submitted to pelvic radiotherapy.盆腔放疗患者阴道狭窄预防的共识。
PLoS One. 2019 Aug 9;14(8):e0221054. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0221054. eCollection 2019.
6
Validation of criteria for nosocomial use of amikacin in Brazil with the Delphi technique.运用德尔菲技术验证巴西医院使用阿米卡星的标准
Braz J Infect Dis. 2006 Jun;10(3):173-8. doi: 10.1590/s1413-86702006000300004.
7
Validation of an instrument for patient classification to support obstetric nursing care.用于患者分类以支持产科护理的一种工具的验证
Rev Bras Enferm. 2024 Jul 19;77(2):e20230401. doi: 10.1590/0034-7167-2023-0401. eCollection 2024.
8
Development of a Brazilian Food Truck Risk Assessment Instrument.开发巴西快餐车风险评估工具。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Nov 23;15(12):2624. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15122624.
9
Nursing care protocol for patients with a ventricular assist device.心室辅助装置患者的护理协议
Rev Bras Enferm. 2017 Apr;70(2):335-341. doi: 10.1590/0034-7167-2016-0363.
10
Development and validation of an instrument for procedure-related death notification.制定并验证一种与手术相关的死亡通知的文书。
S Afr Med J. 2020 Jan 29;110(2):140-144. doi: 10.7196/SAMJ.2020.v110i2.14083.

引用本文的文献

1
Effectiveness of educational interventions in improving antimicrobial dispensing by community pharmacists: a systematic review.教育干预措施对提高社区药剂师抗菌药物配药水平的有效性:一项系统综述
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Aug 2;25(1):1140. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-07309-1.
2
"Opportunities and responsibilities": how do pharmacists assess their professionalism?“机遇与责任”:药师如何评价自身的专业性?
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Aug 1;24(1):831. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05767-7.
3
Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric evaluation of the "Modification of Hall's professionalism scale for use with pharmacists".
“Hall 职业精神量表的修正版用于药师的跨文化调适与心理计量评估”。
BMC Med Educ. 2023 Nov 16;23(1):871. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04815-y.
4
Antimicrobial dispensing process in community pharmacies: a scoping review.社区药店的抗菌药物调配流程:范围综述。
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2022 Sep 17;11(1):116. doi: 10.1186/s13756-022-01157-0.
5
Perception of community pharmacists about the work process of drug dispensing: a cross-sectional survey study.社区药剂师对发药工作流程的认知:一项横断面调查研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Feb 8;22(1):161. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-07528-y.
6
A new comprehensive oral health literacy scale: development and psychometric evaluation.一种新的全面口腔健康素养量表:编制与心理测量学评估。
BMC Oral Health. 2021 Sep 5;21(1):429. doi: 10.1186/s12903-021-01795-7.
7
Does drug dispensing improve the health outcomes of patients attending community pharmacies? A systematic review.药物配发是否能改善在社区药房就诊的患者的健康结果?系统评价。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Aug 2;21(1):764. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06770-0.