• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

支持药剂师为患者配发处方药的药学咨询工具的编制与内容验证。

Development and content validation of an instrument to support pharmaceutical counselling for dispensing of prescribed medicines.

机构信息

Laboratory of Teaching and Research in Social Pharmacy (LEPFS), Department of Pharmacy, Federal University of Sergipe, São Cristóvão, Brazil.

Department of Pharmacy, Federal University of Juiz de Fora, Governador Valadares, Brazil.

出版信息

J Eval Clin Pract. 2020 Feb;26(1):134-141. doi: 10.1111/jep.13102. Epub 2019 Jan 31.

DOI:10.1111/jep.13102
PMID:30701631
Abstract

RATIONALE, AIMS, AND OBJECTIVES: Counselling is essential in drug dispensing, since it enables patients to receive and understand the information to correctly use their medicines. Although counselling is a quality indicator on drug dispensing, models that guide pharmacists in this practice are scarce. Thus, this study aimed to develop and validate the content of an instrument to support pharmaceutical counselling for dispensing of prescribed medicines.

METHOD

A two-stage validation study was conducted out from February to October 2017. The first stage involved the development of the instrument, and the second involved content validation. Instrument development included the following three steps: (1) drafting of the prototype; (2) an academic brainstorming meeting, and (3) a pre-Delphi process. Content validation was then conducted using the Delphi technique. At this stage, 40 pharmacists who were experts in drug dispensing, were invited to assess the instrument. Consensus among experts was calculated according to the content validity index (CVI).

RESULTS

The development stage generated three versions of the instrument: the prototype, Version 1 (modified after brainstorming meeting), and Version 2 (modified after the pre-Delphi process). Version 2 underwent the content validation process, in which 29 pharmacists participated during the first round (rate of return: 72.5%) and 23 of these during the second round (rate of return: 79.31%). All items obtained CVI > 0.82 and were thus considered to be validated. The final instrument comprised three components: suggestions for questions, dispensing process reasoning, and suggestions for counselling, and other conduct in 11 stages, each representing a step in the clinical reasoning process.

CONCLUSIONS

An instrument was developed to support pharmaceutical counselling for dispensing of prescribed medicines, suggesting main questions, counselling, and conduct to be taken by pharmacists, and its content validity was verified.

摘要

背景、目的和目标:在药品配发中,咨询是必不可少的,因为它使患者能够接收和理解信息,从而正确使用他们的药物。尽管咨询是药品配发的质量指标,但指导药剂师进行这种实践的模式却很少。因此,本研究旨在制定和验证一种支持配药时进行药物咨询的工具的内容。

方法

本研究采用了分两个阶段的验证研究,从 2017 年 2 月至 10 月进行。第一阶段涉及工具的开发,第二阶段涉及内容验证。工具的开发包括以下三个步骤:(1)起草原型;(2)学术头脑风暴会议,和(3)预 Delphi 过程。然后使用 Delphi 技术进行内容验证。在这个阶段,邀请了 40 名在药品配发方面具有专业知识的药剂师来评估该工具。根据内容有效性指数(CVI)计算专家之间的共识。

结果

在开发阶段生成了该工具的三个版本:原型、第 1 版(头脑风暴会议后修改)和第 2 版(预 Delphi 过程后修改)。第 2 版进行了内容验证过程,第一轮有 29 名药剂师参加(回收率:72.5%),第二轮有 23 名参加(回收率:79.31%)。所有项目的 CVI 均大于 0.82,因此被认为是有效的。最终的工具包括三个部分:问题建议、配药过程推理和咨询建议,以及其他在 11 个阶段的行为,每个阶段都代表临床推理过程的一个步骤。

结论

开发了一种支持配药时进行药物咨询的工具,为药剂师提供了主要问题、咨询和行为建议,验证了其内容的有效性。

相似文献

1
Development and content validation of an instrument to support pharmaceutical counselling for dispensing of prescribed medicines.支持药剂师为患者配发处方药的药学咨询工具的编制与内容验证。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2020 Feb;26(1):134-141. doi: 10.1111/jep.13102. Epub 2019 Jan 31.
2
Development and content validation of an instrument to document the dispensing of prescribed medicines.制定并验证用于记录处方药品配发情况的工具。
J Clin Pharm Ther. 2019 Jun;44(3):430-439. doi: 10.1111/jcpt.12803. Epub 2019 Jan 30.
3
Perception of community pharmacists about the work process of drug dispensing: a cross-sectional survey study.社区药剂师对发药工作流程的认知:一项横断面调查研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Feb 8;22(1):161. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-07528-y.
4
Pharmacists combating antimicrobial resistance: A Delphi study on antibiotic dispensing.药剂师对抗抗菌药物耐药性:抗生素配药的德尔菲研究。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2024 Aug;20(8):723-732. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2024.04.006. Epub 2024 Apr 16.
5
Dispensing of Prescribed Medicines in Swiss Community Pharmacies-Observed Counselling Activities.瑞士社区药房的处方药配药——观察到的咨询活动
Pharmacy (Basel). 2018 Dec 21;7(1):1. doi: 10.3390/pharmacy7010001.
6
Medication dispensing errors in Palestinian community pharmacy practice: a formal consensus using the Delphi technique.巴勒斯坦社区药房实践中的药物调配错误:运用德尔菲技术达成的正式共识
Int J Clin Pharm. 2016 Oct;38(5):1112-23. doi: 10.1007/s11096-016-0338-x. Epub 2016 Jun 30.
7
Medication counselling and dispensing practices at community pharmacies: a comparative cross sectional study from Pakistan.社区药店的药物咨询和配药实践:来自巴基斯坦的一项比较横断面研究。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2011 Oct;33(5):859-67. doi: 10.1007/s11096-011-9554-6. Epub 2011 Aug 19.
8
Pharmaceutical interventions on prescribed medicines in community pharmacies: focus on patient-reported problems.社区药房对处方药的药学干预:关注患者报告的问题。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2018 Apr;40(2):335-340. doi: 10.1007/s11096-018-0595-y. Epub 2018 Feb 5.
9
Consumers' perceptions on the contribution of community pharmacists in the dispensing process at Dawadmi.消费者对达瓦迪社区药剂师在配药过程中所做贡献的看法。
Saudi Pharm J. 2015 Jul;23(3):230-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jsps.2014.11.002. Epub 2014 Nov 20.
10
Design and content validation of an instrument measuring user perception of the persuasive design principles in a breastfeeding mHealth app: A modified Delphi study.测量母乳喂养移动健康应用程序中用户对劝导设计原则感知的工具的设计和内容验证:一项改良德尔菲研究。
Int J Med Inform. 2022 Aug;164:104789. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2022.104789. Epub 2022 May 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Drug dispensing in public community pharmacies: evidence from the MedMinas project.社区药店配药情况:来自 MedMinas 项目的证据。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Nov 6;24(1):1354. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11816-0.
2
Performance, interpersonal relationships and professional satisfaction: determinants to support pharmaceutical reengineering.绩效、人际关系与职业满意度:支持医药再造工程的决定因素
Explor Res Clin Soc Pharm. 2024 Aug 22;15:100497. doi: 10.1016/j.rcsop.2024.100497. eCollection 2024 Sep.
3
"Opportunities and responsibilities": how do pharmacists assess their professionalism?
“机遇与责任”:药师如何评价自身的专业性?
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Aug 1;24(1):831. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05767-7.
4
The academic formation challenges: what does retail expect from higher education institutions in pharmacy?学术培养的挑战:零售行业对药学院校有哪些期望?
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Apr 25;24(1):456. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05435-w.
5
Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric evaluation of the "Modification of Hall's professionalism scale for use with pharmacists".“Hall 职业精神量表的修正版用于药师的跨文化调适与心理计量评估”。
BMC Med Educ. 2023 Nov 16;23(1):871. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04815-y.
6
Evaluation of pharmacist's practices regarding the antimicrobials dispensing: a simulated patient study.评价药师在抗菌药物调配方面的实践:一项模拟患者研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Dec 23;22(1):1576. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08853-y.
7
Antimicrobial dispensing process in community pharmacies: a scoping review.社区药店的抗菌药物调配流程:范围综述。
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2022 Sep 17;11(1):116. doi: 10.1186/s13756-022-01157-0.
8
Perception of community pharmacists about the work process of drug dispensing: a cross-sectional survey study.社区药剂师对发药工作流程的认知:一项横断面调查研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Feb 8;22(1):161. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-07528-y.
9
Does drug dispensing improve the health outcomes of patients attending community pharmacies? A systematic review.药物配发是否能改善在社区药房就诊的患者的健康结果?系统评价。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Aug 2;21(1):764. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06770-0.
10
Quality Indicators of Pharmaceutical Care for Integrative Healthcare: A Scoping Review of Indicators Developed Using the Delphi Technique.整合医疗药学服务的质量指标:基于德尔菲法制定指标的范围综述
Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2020 Mar 19;2020:9131850. doi: 10.1155/2020/9131850. eCollection 2020.