• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估西方国家医护人员伤害率及其决定因素的范围审查方案。

Protocol of a scoping review assessing injury rates and their determinants among healthcare workers in western countries.

机构信息

Department of Health Sciences (DISSAL), Postgraduate School of Occupational Medicine, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.

Occupational Medicine Unit, Policlinico San Martino Hospital IRCCS, Genoa, Italy.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2019 Jan 30;9(1):e023372. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023372.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023372
PMID:30705239
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6359735/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Healthcare workers (HCWs) are exposed to various risk factors and risky behaviours that may seriously affect their health and ability to work. The aim of this protocol is to detail the steps to follow in order to carry out a scoping review to assess the prevalence/incidence of injuries among HCWs.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

The study will be carried out in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses-Protocols guidelines. Studies will be selected according to the following criteria: P (HCWs), E (exposure to injuries), C (different types of exposure and different categories of HCWs) and O (prevalence/incidence and determinants of injuries). A time filter has been set (literature between 2000 and 2018) to enable updated, direct comparison between the findings and the epidemiological data available at national and local 'Istituto Nazionale per l'Assicurazione contro gli Infortuni sul Lavoro' (National Institute for Insurance Against Accidents at Work) centres in Italy. No language restriction will be applied.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Formal ethical approval is not required; primary data will not be collected, as they have already been published. The results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publication(s), conference presentation(s) and the press.

摘要

简介

医护人员(HCWs)面临着各种可能严重影响其健康和工作能力的风险因素和危险行为。本方案旨在详细说明开展评估医护人员受伤发生率/患病率的范围综述的步骤。

方法和分析

本研究将根据系统评价和荟萃分析首选报告项目-方案指南进行。将根据以下标准选择研究:P(HCWs)、E(受伤暴露)、C(不同类型的暴露和不同类别的 HCWs)和 O(受伤的发生率/患病率和决定因素)。设置了时间筛选器(2000 年至 2018 年的文献),以实现对意大利国家意外保险研究所(Istituto Nazionale per l'Assicurazione contro gli Infortuni sul Lavoro)中心现有全国和地方流行病学数据的最新、直接比较,研究结果和发现。不应用语言限制。

伦理和传播

不需要正式的伦理批准;不会收集原始数据,因为它们已经发表过了。研究结果将通过同行评审出版物、会议演讲和新闻进行传播。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3828/6359735/a6fc16ad3534/bmjopen-2018-023372f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3828/6359735/a6fc16ad3534/bmjopen-2018-023372f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3828/6359735/a6fc16ad3534/bmjopen-2018-023372f01.jpg

相似文献

1
Protocol of a scoping review assessing injury rates and their determinants among healthcare workers in western countries.评估西方国家医护人员伤害率及其决定因素的范围审查方案。
BMJ Open. 2019 Jan 30;9(1):e023372. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023372.
2
Orthopantomography and INAIL assessment of dental injury. Istituto Nazionale per l'Assicurazione contro gli Infortuni sul Lavoro.牙科损伤的曲面体层摄影术和意大利国家工伤保险协会(INAIL)评估。意大利国家工伤保险协会
Panminerva Med. 1993 Dec;35(4):240-3.
3
[HISTORICAL NOTES ON THE EVOLUTION OF THE HEALTH ORGANIZATION OF THE ISTITUTO NAZIONALE PER L'ASSICURAZIONE CONTRO GLI INFORTUNI SUL LAVORO].[关于国家工伤事故保险协会健康组织发展的历史记录]
Riv Infort Mal Prof. 1964 Mar-Apr;51:281-300.
4
[Accidents at work among women: an example from the INAIL data. Istituto Nazionale per l'Assicurazione contro gli Infortuni sul Lavoro].[职业女性的工伤事故:以意大利国家工伤事故保险协会(INAIL)的数据为例]
Epidemiol Prev. 1996 Apr-Sep;20(2-3):208-10.
5
Prevalence of occupational accidents/Injuries among health care workers in a federal medical centre in southern Nigeria.尼日利亚南部一家联邦医疗中心医护人员的职业事故/伤害发生率
West Afr J Med. 2012 Jan-Mar;31(1):47-51.
6
Occupational injuries among health care workers at a public hospital in Ghana.加纳一家公立医院医护人员的职业伤害。
Pan Afr Med J. 2021 Jun 3;39:103. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2021.39.103.23542. eCollection 2021.
7
Risk factors for COVID-19 among healthcare workers. A protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.医护人员中新型冠状病毒肺炎的危险因素。一项系统评价与荟萃分析方案。
PLoS One. 2021 May 4;16(5):e0250958. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250958. eCollection 2021.
8
Use of machine learning in occupational risk communication for healthcare workers: protocol for scoping review.机器学习在医护人员职业风险沟通中的应用:范围综述方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Jan 8;15(1):e088729. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-088729.
9
Sharps injuries and splash exposures among healthcare workers in Arab countries: protocol of a systematic review and meta-analysis.阿拉伯国家医护人员的锐器伤和喷溅暴露:系统评价和荟萃分析方案。
BMJ Open. 2021 Oct 7;11(10):e052993. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052993.
10
Workplace violence against paramedic personnel: a protocol for a scoping review.工作场所暴力侵害急救人员:范围综述研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Jan 13;13(1):e067246. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-067246.

引用本文的文献

1
Occupational Injuries and Their Determinants Among Healthcare Workers in Western Countries: A Scoping Review.西方国家医护人员的职业伤害及其决定因素:一项范围综述
Med Lav. 2025 Feb 21;116(1):16664. doi: 10.23749/mdl.v116i1.16664.
2
Key factors for effective implementation of healthcare worker support interventions after patient safety incidents in health organisations: a protocol for a scoping review.卫生组织发生患者安全事件后有效实施医护人员支持干预措施的关键因素:系统评价方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Aug 4;12(8):e061543. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061543.
3
Vocational rehabilitation for mental health service users with chronic mental illness in low-income to upper-middle-income countries: a scoping review protocol.

本文引用的文献

1
Global prevalence of percutaneous injuries among healthcare workers: a systematic review and meta-analysis.全球医护人员 percutaneous 损伤的患病率:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Epidemiol. 2018 Dec 1;47(6):1972-1980. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyy208.
2
PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation.PRISMA 扩展用于范围审查 (PRISMA-ScR): 清单和解释。
Ann Intern Med. 2018 Oct 2;169(7):467-473. doi: 10.7326/M18-0850. Epub 2018 Sep 4.
3
Individual vulnerability to insomnia, excessive sleepiness and shift work disorder amongst healthcare shift workers. A systematic review.
中低收入国家慢性精神疾病精神卫生服务使用者的职业康复:范围综述方案。
BMJ Open. 2021 Jul 14;11(7):e047781. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047781.
4
Health care workers' experiences of workplace incidents that posed a risk of patient and worker injury: a critical incident technique analysis.医护人员遭遇的有患者和医护人员受伤风险的工作场所事件的经历:关键事件技术分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 May 27;21(1):511. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06517-x.
5
Methods for the health technology assessment of complex interventions: a protocol for a scoping review.复杂干预措施的卫生技术评估方法:一项范围综述方案
BMJ Open. 2020 Nov 30;10(11):e039263. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039263.
6
Atti del 52° Congresso Nazionale: Società Italiana di Igiene, Medicina Preventiva e Sanità Pubblica (SItI).第52届全国大会会议记录:意大利卫生、预防医学与公共卫生学会(SItI)
J Prev Med Hyg. 2019 Oct 15;60(3 Suppl 1):E1-E384. doi: 10.15167/2421-4248/jpmh2019.60.3s1. eCollection 2019 Oct.
医护轮班工人中失眠、过度嗜睡和轮班工作障碍的个体脆弱性。系统评价。
Sleep Med Rev. 2018 Oct;41:220-233. doi: 10.1016/j.smrv.2018.03.005. Epub 2018 Mar 27.
4
A qualitative meta-synthesis of emergency department staff experiences of violence and aggression.急诊科工作人员暴力与攻击经历的质性元综合研究
Int Emerg Nurs. 2018 Jul;39:13-19. doi: 10.1016/j.ienj.2017.12.004. Epub 2018 Jan 8.
5
Workplace Violence Toward Mental Healthcare Workers Employed in Psychiatric Wards.针对精神科病房医护人员的工作场所暴力行为。
Saf Health Work. 2017 Dec;8(4):337-342. doi: 10.1016/j.shaw.2017.01.004. Epub 2017 Feb 6.
6
Violence in mental health settings: A systematic review.精神卫生机构中的暴力:系统评价。
Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2018 Feb;27(1):33-45. doi: 10.1111/inm.12425. Epub 2017 Dec 21.
7
[Analysis of incidents of violence in a large Italian hospital].[意大利一家大型医院暴力事件分析]
Med Lav. 2017 Oct 27;108(5):6005. doi: 10.23749/mdl.v108i5.6005.
8
Invasive Meningococcal Disease on the Workplaces: a systematic review.工作场所的侵袭性脑膜炎球菌病:一项系统综述。
Acta Biomed. 2017 Oct 23;88(3):337-351. doi: 10.23750/abm.v88i3.6726.
9
Systematic review found that there was moderate evidence that vaccinating healthcare workers prevented pertussis in infants.系统评价发现,有中等证据表明为医护人员接种疫苗可预防婴儿百日咳。
Acta Paediatr. 2018 Feb;107(2):210-218. doi: 10.1111/apa.14124. Epub 2017 Nov 22.
10
Clinical, economic, and humanistic burden of needlestick injuries in healthcare workers.医护人员针刺伤的临床、经济和人文负担。
Med Devices (Auckl). 2017 Sep 29;10:225-235. doi: 10.2147/MDER.S140846. eCollection 2017.