Hess George, Peterson M Nils
Department of Forestry & Environmental Resources, NC State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2015 Aug 28;10(8):e0136973. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0136973. eCollection 2015.
Many global challenges, including obesity, health care costs, and climate change, could be addressed in part by increasing the use of bicycles for transportation. Concern about the safety of bicycling on roadways is frequently cited as a deterrent to increasing bicycle use in the USA. The use of effective signage along roadways might help alleviate these concerns by increasing knowledge about the rights and duties of bicyclists and motorists, ideally reducing crashes. We administered a web-based survey, using Twitter for recruitment, to examine how well three US traffic control devices communicated the message that bicyclists are permitted in the center of the travel lane and do not have to "get out of the way" to allow motorists to pass without changing lanes: "Bicycles May Use Full Lane" and "Share the Road" signage, and Shared Lane Markings on the pavement. Each was compared to an unsigned roadway. We also asked respondents whether it was safe for a bicyclist to occupy the center of the travel lane. "Bicycles May Use Full Lane" signage was the most consistently comprehended device for communicating the message that bicyclists may occupy the travel lane and also increased perceptions of safety. "Share the Road" signage did not increase comprehension or perceptions of safety. Shared Lane Markings fell somewhere between. "Bicycles May Use Full Lane" signage showed notable increases in comprehension among novice bicyclists and private motor vehicle commuters, critical target audiences for efforts to promote bicycling in the USA. Although limited in scope, our survey results are indicative and suggest that Departments of Transportation consider replacing "Share the Road" with "Bicycles May Use Full Lane" signage, possibly combined with Shared Lane Markings, if the intent is to increase awareness of roadway rights and responsibilities. Further evaluation through virtual reality simulations and on-road experiments is merited.
包括肥胖、医疗保健成本和气候变化在内的许多全球性挑战,都可以通过增加自行车用于交通的比例来部分解决。在美国,人们经常提到对在道路上骑自行车安全性的担忧,这是增加自行车使用量的一个阻碍。在道路上使用有效的标识可能有助于缓解这些担忧,通过增加骑自行车者和驾车者的权利与义务方面的知识,理想情况下减少撞车事故。我们进行了一项基于网络的调查,利用推特进行招募,以研究美国三种交通控制设备在传达骑自行车者可以在行车道中心行驶且不必“让道”以便驾车者不换道就能通过这一信息方面的效果如何:“自行车可使用整条车道”和“共用车道”标识,以及路面上的共享车道标记。每种标识都与一条没有标识的道路进行了比较。我们还询问了受访者,骑自行车者在行车道中心行驶是否安全。“自行车可使用整条车道”标识是传达骑自行车者可以占用行车道这一信息最容易被理解的设备,并且还增强了对安全性的认知。“共用车道”标识并没有提高理解程度或对安全性的认知。共享车道标记的效果介于两者之间。“自行车可使用整条车道”标识在新手骑自行车者和私家机动车通勤者(美国推广自行车使用的关键目标受众)中的理解程度有显著提高。尽管我们的调查范围有限,但结果具有指示性,表明如果交通部门有意提高对道路权利和责任的认识,可考虑用“自行车可使用整条车道”标识取代“共用车道”标识,可能还需结合共享车道标记。值得通过虚拟现实模拟和道路实验进行进一步评估。