Department of Surgery, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2018 Dec 1;7(12):1151-1154. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2018.87.
In 2015, the Lancet Commission on Global Surgery (LCoGS) working groups developed a National Surgical, Obstetric, and Anesthesia Plan (NSOAP) framework to guide national surgical system development globally predicated on six data points (indicators) which can assess surgical systems. Zambia as well as other subSaharan Africa (SSA) countries have forged ahead in designing and implementing interventions based on LCoGS indicators collected to inform NSOAP. Concurrently, the Zambian team and others have recognized the need for rigorous scientific inquiry to assess and iteratively improve upon the NSOAP process and outputs. Based on the Zambian experience, as well as that of ours in Colombia, we have identified "core principles" through convergent works which inform a scientific framework through which NSOAP can be evaluated. We propose that when contextualized, participatory action research (PAR) and dissemination and implementation science are methodologies upon which a robust framework can be developed to achieving objective and iterative NSOAP evaluation, and ultimately universal health coverage as envisioned by the World Health Organization (WHO).
2015 年,柳叶刀全球外科学委员会(LCoGS)工作组制定了国家外科学、产科和麻醉计划(NSOAP)框架,旨在根据可评估外科系统的六个数据点(指标)指导全球外科系统的发展。赞比亚和其他撒哈拉以南非洲(SSA)国家在根据 LCoGS 指标设计和实施干预措施方面取得了进展,这些指标用于为 NSOAP 提供信息。同时,赞比亚团队和其他团队认识到需要进行严格的科学研究,以评估和迭代改进 NSOAP 流程和产出。基于赞比亚的经验,以及我们在哥伦比亚的经验,我们通过趋同工作确定了“核心原则”,为通过 NSOAP 进行评估的科学框架提供了信息。我们提出,当参与式行动研究(PAR)和传播与实施科学在上下文中得到应用时,就可以制定一个强大的框架,以实现客观和迭代的 NSOAP 评估,并最终实现世界卫生组织(WHO)所设想的全民健康覆盖。