Suppr超能文献

利用分类法和指标:何时以及为何研究——评“医疗保健组织和系统决策中患者参与的指标和评估工具:系统评价”。

Using the Taxonomy and the Metrics: What to Study When and Why Comment on "Metrics and Evaluation Tools for Patient Engagement in Healthcare Organization- and System-Level Decision-Making: A Systematic Review".

机构信息

American Institutes for Research, Washington, DC, USA.

Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy, City University of New York, New York City, NY, USA.

出版信息

Int J Health Policy Manag. 2019 Jan 1;8(1):51-54. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2018.99.

Abstract

Dukhanin and colleagues' taxonomy of metrics for patient engagement at the organizational and system levels has great potential for supporting more careful and useful evaluations of this ever-growing phenomenon. This commentary highlights the central importance to the taxonomy of metrics assessing the extent of meaningful participation in decision-making by patients, consumers and community members; discusses how the purpose of an evaluation and the organizational relationships among key evaluation stakeholders is likely to influence the choice of metrics in important ways; and suggests a recasting of the metrics in the form of a logic model that supports the selection of metrics that are appropriate for a program given its stage of development and the purposes of the study.

摘要

杜哈宁及其同事提出的组织和系统层面患者参与度评估指标分类法具有很大的潜力,可以更好地支持对这一不断发展的现象进行更仔细、更有用的评估。本评论重点强调了对评估指标的重要性,这些指标衡量患者、消费者和社区成员在决策中进行有意义的参与的程度;讨论了评估的目的以及关键评估利益相关者之间的组织关系如何可能以重要的方式影响指标的选择;并建议以逻辑模型的形式重新制定这些指标,以支持根据计划的发展阶段和研究目的选择适合该计划的指标。

相似文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验