a Department of Psychology , Michigan State University , East Lansing , Michigan , USA.
J Trauma Dissociation. 2019 May-Jun;20(3):304-323. doi: 10.1080/15299732.2019.1571889. Epub 2019 Feb 2.
Recent policy reforms related to campus sexual assault may pose confidentiality concerns for victims. The current study aimed to understand current issues in providing confidential advocacy services for college victims of sexual assault, as well as the differential roles that campus-based and community-based advocacy play for college victims. For this qualitative study, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 22 national experts on campus sexual assault from a variety of disciplinary backgrounds. The results indicate that campus-based advocates face challenges in maintaining confidentiality of victims' information, whereas community-based advocates are more likely to have legal confidentiality protections. Consequently, participants noted that an ideal advocacy model for college victims might be one in which campus- and community-based services are closely coordinated to ensure access to services that are both confidential and meet the unique needs of college students. Implications for advocacy services are discussed, as well as future directions for research and evaluation on the effects of evolving policy aimed at improving institutional responses to sexual assault.
最近与校园性侵犯有关的政策改革可能会给受害者带来保密问题。本研究旨在了解为大学性侵犯受害者提供保密宣传服务方面存在的当前问题,以及基于校园和基于社区的宣传在为大学受害者提供服务方面的不同作用。在这项定性研究中,对来自各种学科背景的 22 名全国校园性侵犯问题专家进行了半结构化访谈。结果表明,校园宣传者在维护受害者信息保密方面面临挑战,而社区宣传者更有可能受到法律保密保护。因此,参与者指出,对于大学受害者来说,理想的宣传模式可能是校园和社区服务紧密协调,以确保获得既保密又能满足大学生独特需求的服务。讨论了宣传服务的意义,以及针对旨在改善机构对性侵犯反应的不断发展的政策的效果进行研究和评估的未来方向。