Psychology Department, University of North Texas.
Department of Behavioral Sciences, University of Michigan-Dearborn.
J Pers Assess. 2020 Jul-Aug;102(4):551-562. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2018.1557668. Epub 2019 Feb 4.
Assessors using storytelling assessment techniques have debated the relative importance of picture imagery (card pull) versus story content for interpreting clients' stories. This study used generalizability theory to compare sources of variance in scores for Feffer's Interpersonal Decentering as a function of persons, cards, raters, or interactions. Representing situational activation of mature role-taking (mentalizing of interpersonal processes), decentering activity should differ across interpersonal situations according to the social role norms involved, resulting in more variance due to card pull than for previously studied scoring systems. Decentering scores from stories told to heterosexual romantic-pull pictures were compared with those for other pictures and with scores from romantic versus nonromantic stories to identify score variance explained by card pull and story content. Considering cards as analogs for life situations, person-card interaction explained more decentering variance (53.7%) than did other effects. Heterosexual romantic-pull pictures stimulated more mature decentering than others; story content did not explain significant variance. Women told more mature decentering stories to heterosexual romantic-pull pictures than to other pictures, and more so than men did. Finding strong person-card interaction illuminates typically low internal consistency for content-based scoring systems. Recommendations for clinicians include implications for card selection and story content interpretation.
评估者使用叙事评估技术对图片意象(抽卡)与故事内容在解释客户故事时的相对重要性进行了辩论。本研究使用概化理论比较了费弗人际去中心量表评分的不同来源的方差,这些来源包括个体、卡片、评分者或交互作用。人际去中心活动代表了成熟角色承担(人际过程的心理化)的情境激活,根据所涉及的社会角色规范,去中心活动应该在不同的人际情境中有所不同,这导致由于抽卡而产生的方差大于之前研究的评分系统。将异性恋浪漫抽卡图片的故事讲述与其他图片的故事讲述的去中心评分进行比较,并将浪漫故事与非浪漫故事的评分进行比较,以确定卡片抽取和故事内容解释的评分方差。考虑到卡片作为生活情境的模拟,人与卡片的交互作用解释了更多的去中心方差(53.7%),而其他效应则不然。异性恋浪漫抽卡图片比其他图片更能激发更成熟的去中心,而故事内容则没有解释显著的方差。女性向异性恋浪漫抽卡图片讲述的更成熟的去中心故事比其他图片多,而男性则不然。发现强烈的人与卡片的交互作用阐明了基于内容的评分系统通常较低的内部一致性。对临床医生的建议包括对卡片选择和故事内容解释的影响。