• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在真实世界的多发性硬化症临床实践队列中比较纵向脑萎缩测量技术:迈向临床整合?

Comparing longitudinal brain atrophy measurement techniques in a real-world multiple sclerosis clinical practice cohort: towards clinical integration?

作者信息

Beadnall H N, Wang C, Van Hecke W, Ribbens A, Billiet T, Barnett M H

机构信息

Brain and Mind Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia.

Brain and Mind Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia Sydney Neuroimaging Analysis Centre, Sydney, Australia.

出版信息

Ther Adv Neurol Disord. 2019 Jan 25;12:1756286418823462. doi: 10.1177/1756286418823462. eCollection 2019.

DOI:10.1177/1756286418823462
PMID:30719080
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6348578/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Whole brain atrophy (WBA) estimates in multiple sclerosis (MS) correlate more robustly with clinical disability than traditional, lesion-based metrics. We compare Structural Image Evaluation using Normalisation of Atrophy (SIENA) with the icobrain longitudinal pipeline (icobrain long), for assessment of longitudinal WBA in MS patients.

METHODS

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan pairs [1.05 (±0.15) year separation] from 102 MS patients were acquired on the same 3T scanner. Three-dimensional (3D) T1-weighted and two-dimensional (2D)/3D fluid-attenuated inversion-recovery sequences were analysed. Percentage brain volume change (PBVC) measurements were calculated using SIENA and icobrain long. Statistical correlation, agreement and consistency between methods was evaluated; MRI brain volumetric and clinical data were compared. The proportion of the cohort with annualized brain volume loss (aBVL) rates ⩾ 0.4%, ⩾0.8% and ⩾0.94% were calculated. No evidence of disease activity (NEDA) 3 and NEDA 4 were also determined.

RESULTS

Mean annualized PBVC was -0.59 (±0.65)% and -0.64 (±0.73)% as measured by icobrain long and SIENA. icobrain long and SIENA-measured annualized PBVC correlated strongly, = 0.805 ( < 0.001), and the agreement [intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) 0.800] and consistency (ICC 0.801) were excellent. Weak correlations were found between MRI metrics and Expanded Disability Status Scale scores. Over half the cohort had aBVL ⩾ 0.4%, approximately a third ⩾0.8%, and aBVL was ⩾0.94% in 28.43% and 23.53% using SIENA and icobrain long, respectively. NEDA 3 was achieved in 35.29%, and NEDA 4 in 15.69% and 16.67% of the cohort, using SIENA and icobrain long to derive PBVC, respectively.

DISCUSSION

icobrain long quantified longitudinal WBA with a strong level of statistical agreement and consistency compared to SIENA in this real-world MS population. Utility of WBA measures in individuals remains challenging, but show promise as biomarkers of neurodegeneration in MS clinical practice. Optimization of MRI analysis algorithms/techniques are needed to allow reliable use in individuals. Increased levels of automation will enable more rapid clinical translation.

摘要

背景

与传统的基于病灶的指标相比,多发性硬化症(MS)中的全脑萎缩(WBA)估计与临床残疾的相关性更强。我们比较了使用萎缩归一化的结构图像评估(SIENA)和icobrain纵向分析流程(icobrain long),以评估MS患者的纵向WBA。

方法

在同一台3T扫描仪上获取了102例MS患者的磁共振成像(MRI)扫描对[间隔1.05(±0.15)年]。分析了三维(3D)T1加权和二维(2D)/3D液体衰减反转恢复序列。使用SIENA和icobrain long计算脑体积变化百分比(PBVC)测量值。评估了两种方法之间的统计相关性、一致性和一致性;比较了MRI脑容量和临床数据。计算了年化脑容量损失(aBVL)率≥0.4%、≥0.8%和≥0.94%的队列比例。还确定了无疾病活动证据(NEDA)3和NEDA 4。

结果

icobrain long和SIENA测量的平均年化PBVC分别为-0.59(±0.65)%和-0.64(±0.73)%。icobrain long和SIENA测量的年化PBVC相关性很强,r = 0.805(P < 0.001),一致性[组内相关系数(ICC)0.800]和一致性(ICC 0.801)非常好。在MRI指标和扩展残疾状态量表评分之间发现了弱相关性。超过一半的队列aBVL≥0.4%,约三分之一≥0.8%,使用SIENA和icobrain long时,aBVL≥0.94%的比例分别为28.43%和23.53%。使用SIENA和icobrain long得出PBVC时,队列中分别有35.29%、15.69%和16.67%达到了NEDA 3和NEDA 4。

讨论

在这个真实世界的MS人群中,与SIENA相比,icobrain long在统计一致性和一致性水平上对纵向WBA进行了量化。WBA测量在个体中的实用性仍然具有挑战性,但在MS临床实践中作为神经退行性变的生物标志物显示出前景。需要优化MRI分析算法/技术,以便在个体中可靠使用。更高水平的自动化将实现更快速的临床转化。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4011/6348578/d531595e6275/10.1177_1756286418823462-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4011/6348578/96cdf2d57503/10.1177_1756286418823462-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4011/6348578/7b052022b64a/10.1177_1756286418823462-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4011/6348578/d531595e6275/10.1177_1756286418823462-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4011/6348578/96cdf2d57503/10.1177_1756286418823462-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4011/6348578/7b052022b64a/10.1177_1756286418823462-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4011/6348578/d531595e6275/10.1177_1756286418823462-fig3.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparing longitudinal brain atrophy measurement techniques in a real-world multiple sclerosis clinical practice cohort: towards clinical integration?在真实世界的多发性硬化症临床实践队列中比较纵向脑萎缩测量技术:迈向临床整合?
Ther Adv Neurol Disord. 2019 Jan 25;12:1756286418823462. doi: 10.1177/1756286418823462. eCollection 2019.
2
Learning from pseudo-labels: deep networks improve consistency in longitudinal brain volume estimation.从伪标签中学习:深度网络提高纵向脑容量估计的一致性。
Front Neurosci. 2023 Jul 6;17:1196087. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1196087. eCollection 2023.
3
Agreement of MSmetrix with established methods for measuring cross-sectional and longitudinal brain atrophy.MSmetrix 与用于测量脑横断面积和纵向萎缩的既定方法的一致性。
Neuroimage Clin. 2017 Jun 30;15:843-853. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2017.06.034. eCollection 2017.
4
Inclusion of the Symbol Digit Modalities Test in a revised assessment of 'no evidence of disease activity-4 (NEDA-4)' in Latin-American patients with multiple sclerosis.将符号数字模态测验纳入拉丁美洲多发性硬化症患者修订后的“无疾病活动-4 (NEDA-4)”评估中。
Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2020 Jul;42:102076. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2020.102076. Epub 2020 Apr 26.
5
Agreement between different input image types in brain atrophy measurement in multiple sclerosis using SIENAX and SIENA.使用SIENAX和SIENA对多发性硬化症脑萎缩测量中不同输入图像类型之间的一致性
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2008 Sep;28(3):559-65. doi: 10.1002/jmri.21501.
6
Intercenter agreement of brain atrophy measurement in multiple sclerosis patients using manually-edited SIENA and SIENAX.使用手动编辑的SIENA和SIENAX对多发性硬化症患者脑萎缩测量的中心间一致性
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2007 Oct;26(4):881-5. doi: 10.1002/jmri.21101.
7
Establishing pathological cut-offs for lateral ventricular volume expansion rates.确立侧脑室容积扩张率的病理截断值。
Neuroimage Clin. 2018 Feb 7;18:494-501. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2018.02.009. eCollection 2018.
8
Feasibility of Brain Atrophy Measurement in Clinical Routine without Prior Standardization of the MRI Protocol: Results from MS-MRIUS, a Longitudinal Observational, Multicenter Real-World Outcome Study in Patients with Relapsing-Remitting MS.临床常规中不进行 MRI 方案标准化而进行脑萎缩测量的可行性:来自 MS-MRIUS 的结果,这是一项在复发缓解型多发性硬化症患者中进行的纵向观察性、多中心真实世界结局研究。
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2018 Feb;39(2):289-295. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A5442. Epub 2017 Nov 23.
9
Central Slab versus Whole Brain to Measure Brain Atrophy in Multiple Sclerosis.在多发性硬化症中,采用中央板层与全脑测量脑萎缩的比较
Eur Neurol. 2018;80(3-4):207-214. doi: 10.1159/000495798. Epub 2019 Jan 3.
10
Clinical feasibility of longitudinal lateral ventricular volume measurements on T2-FLAIR across MRI scanner changes.不同磁共振扫描仪 T2-FLAIR 序列测量纵向侧脑室容积的临床可行性。
Neuroimage Clin. 2021;29:102554. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2020.102554. Epub 2021 Jan 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Relation of Visual Function, Retinal Thickness by Optical Coherence Tomography, and MRI Brain Volume in Pediatric-Onset Multiple Sclerosis.儿童期多发性硬化症的视觉功能、光学相干断层扫描测量的视网膜厚度与脑部MRI体积的关系
Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm. 2025 Nov;12(6):e200480. doi: 10.1212/NXI.0000000000200480. Epub 2025 Sep 9.
2
A systematic literature review of the association between global brain atrophy and the Expanded Disability Status Scale score in people with multiple sclerosis.一项关于全球脑萎缩与多发性硬化症患者扩展残疾状态量表评分之间关联的系统文献综述。
Ther Adv Neurol Disord. 2025 Jul 18;18:17562864241303681. doi: 10.1177/17562864241303681. eCollection 2025.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Urgent challenges in quantification and interpretation of brain grey matter atrophy in individual MS patients using MRI.利用 MRI 对个体 MS 患者脑灰质萎缩进行定量和解释方面的紧迫挑战。
Neuroimage Clin. 2018 Apr 26;19:466-475. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2018.04.023. eCollection 2018.
2
Brain volume loss is present in Japanese multiple sclerosis patients with no evidence of disease activity.日本多发性硬化症患者在没有疾病活动证据的情况下存在脑容量损失。
Neurol Sci. 2018 Oct;39(10):1713-1716. doi: 10.1007/s10072-018-3487-y. Epub 2018 Jul 4.
3
Assessing Biological and Methodological Aspects of Brain Volume Loss in Multiple Sclerosis.
A metformin add-on clinical study in multiple sclerosis to evaluate brain remyelination and neurodegeneration (MACSiMiSE-BRAIN): study protocol for a multi-center randomized placebo controlled clinical trial.
二甲双胍治疗多发性硬化症的附加临床试验,以评估脑髓鞘再生和神经退行性变(MACSiMiSE-BRAIN):一项多中心随机安慰剂对照临床试验的研究方案。
Front Immunol. 2024 Feb 21;15:1362629. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1362629. eCollection 2024.
4
Brain volume loss in Japanese patients with multiple sclerosis is present in the early to middle stage of the disease.日本多发性硬化症患者的脑容量损失出现在疾病的早期至中期。
Heliyon. 2024 Mar 18;10(6):e28136. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e28136. eCollection 2024 Mar 30.
5
A real-world clinical validation for AI-based MRI monitoring in multiple sclerosis.基于人工智能的磁共振成像监测在多发性硬化症中的真实世界临床验证。
NPJ Digit Med. 2023 Oct 19;6(1):196. doi: 10.1038/s41746-023-00940-6.
6
Clinical predictors of NEDA-3 one year after diagnosis of pediatric multiple sclerosis: an exploratory single-center study.儿童多发性硬化症诊断后一年达到无疾病活动状态3(NEDA-3)的临床预测因素:一项探索性单中心研究
Front Neurosci. 2023 Sep 14;17:1259306. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1259306. eCollection 2023.
7
Brain Atrophy as an Outcome of Disease-Modifying Therapy for Remitting-Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis.脑萎缩作为复发缓解型多发性硬化症疾病修正治疗的一种结果
Mult Scler Int. 2023 Aug 31;2023:4130557. doi: 10.1155/2023/4130557. eCollection 2023.
8
Artificial Intelligence for Neuroimaging and Musculoskeletal Radiology: Overview of Current Commercial Algorithms.人工智能在神经影像学和肌肉骨骼放射学中的应用:当前商业算法概述。
Semin Roentgenol. 2023 Apr;58(2):178-183. doi: 10.1053/j.ro.2023.03.002. Epub 2023 Mar 31.
9
Commercial volumetric MRI reporting tools in multiple sclerosis: a systematic review of the evidence.商业容积磁共振成像报告工具在多发性硬化症中的应用:系统评价证据。
Neuroradiology. 2023 Jan;65(1):5-24. doi: 10.1007/s00234-022-03074-w. Epub 2022 Nov 4.
10
Neural diffusion tensor imaging metrics correlate with clinical measures in people with relapsing-remitting MS.神经弥散张量成像指标与复发缓解型多发性硬化患者的临床指标相关。
Neuroradiol J. 2022 Oct;35(5):592-599. doi: 10.1177/19714009211067400. Epub 2022 Feb 4.
评估多发性硬化症中脑容量损失的生物学和方法学方面。
JAMA Neurol. 2018 Oct 1;75(10):1246-1255. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2018.1596.
4
Measurement of Whole-Brain and Gray Matter Atrophy in Multiple Sclerosis: Assessment with MR Imaging.磁共振成像评估多发性硬化症全脑和灰质萎缩的测量。
Radiology. 2018 Aug;288(2):554-564. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2018172468. Epub 2018 May 1.
5
The evolution of "No Evidence of Disease Activity" in multiple sclerosis.多发性硬化症中“无疾病活动证据”的演变。
Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2018 Feb;20:231-238. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2017.12.016. Epub 2017 Dec 25.
6
Within-patient fluctuation of brain volume estimates from short-term repeated MRI measurements using SIENA/FSL.利用 SIENA/FSL 进行短期重复 MRI 测量时脑容量估计的个体内波动。
J Neurol. 2018 May;265(5):1158-1165. doi: 10.1007/s00415-018-8825-8. Epub 2018 Mar 16.
7
The Role of High-Frequency MRI Monitoring in the Detection of Brain Atrophy in Multiple Sclerosis.高频磁共振监测在多发性硬化症脑萎缩检测中的作用。
J Neuroimaging. 2018 May;28(3):328-337. doi: 10.1111/jon.12505. Epub 2018 Feb 27.
8
Effective Utilization of MRI in the Diagnosis and Management of Multiple Sclerosis.磁共振成像在多发性硬化症诊断与管理中的有效应用
Neurol Clin. 2018 Feb;36(1):27-34. doi: 10.1016/j.ncl.2017.08.013.
9
Pathological cut-offs of global and regional brain volume loss in multiple sclerosis.多发性硬化症中全脑和区域性脑容量损失的病理性截止值。
Mult Scler. 2019 Apr;25(4):541-553. doi: 10.1177/1352458517742739. Epub 2017 Nov 16.
10
Agreement of MSmetrix with established methods for measuring cross-sectional and longitudinal brain atrophy.MSmetrix 与用于测量脑横断面积和纵向萎缩的既定方法的一致性。
Neuroimage Clin. 2017 Jun 30;15:843-853. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2017.06.034. eCollection 2017.